In the meeting room of Senator Lee Rhiannon’s office, a few minutes walk from Sydney’s Central Station, a second hand inches its way around a clock face with an insistent tick, tick, tick.
The room is adorned with prints of national parks and past rallies, while a flow-chart decorates another of the walls; boxes and arrows snake upwards to a final rectangle with green text heralding a doomed outcome: “winning a senate seat”.
Just over a week ago, New South Wales state MP Mehreen Faruqi comfortably defeated Rhiannon in a preselection bout to claim the only winnable spot on the Greens’ Senate ticket for the next federal election. After more than 18 years, Rhiannon’s time in parliaments, state and federal, is about to run out.
The result has left Rhiannon’s long-time antagonists ebullient and emboldened critics of the Left Renewal group in NSW, which made waves when it emerged as a quasi-faction at the end of 2016 with a mind to “end capitalism”.
A long-time antagonist of Rhiannon’s, former federal leader Bob Brown, is buoyed by the preselection result.
“It’s a watershed moment for the Greens,” he told Crikey.
Brown suggests members of Left Renewal should now leave the party and run at the next election under their own name instead. He blames Rhiannon’s “divisive” actions for her defeat and says his own dramatic interventions over the last year to denounce her on 7.30 and then Four Corners were “healing”.
One Left Renewal critic in NSW suggests the group has now been “thoroughly rejected”.
“The big turnout and the huge margin is a clear repudiation of factionalism and the attack on the Australian Greens,” they argued. “Members want unity and an outward focus on outcomes, not internal posturing and narrow ideology.”
But in spite of the result, Rhiannon’s backers don’t believe the outcome is necessarily a sign that their side of the party lacks support among the grassroots. To these people, the federal party room — which temporarily barred Rhiannon over her opposition to the government’s Gonski 2.0 legislation — and the interventions of Brown unfairly pushed the contest against Rhiannon.
In a sign of just how heated the issue of alleged intervention has become, Brown was contacted during the preselection campaign by Returning Officers who asked him to delete a tweet linking to a Saturday Paper article that praised the Greens generally but heavily criticised Rhiannon. Brown declined the request. (The NSW Greens have rules banning current and former MPs from publicly commenting on preselection. The ROs received a complaint that Brown’s tweet violated this policy.)
While it’s customary for Greens senators to retire some time out from an election to allow their replacement a spell of incumbency, some of Rhiannon’s supporters are now hoping she’ll stay on and take the fight to Brown, the party room and Richard Di Natale.
Rhiannon says she’s not one to make long-term plans.
“I have no immediate plans to resign,” she said.
When Rhiannon does leave Canberra, she will continue to push her message within the party. In spite of everything, the outgoing Senator remains positive about the Greens and offers praise for Faruqi. Her hope is that the party follows the example set by Corbyn and Sanders.
“I think potentially we’re in an excellent moment,” she reflected. “Around the world the progressive mainstream, if you want to use that term, is tacking to the left and I think we’ve got to ensure that’s what we do.”
By “tack left” Rhiannon means supporting unions, fighting anti-striking and organising laws, and pushing for the re-nationalisation of “key sectors of society”, including the power grid. After years of commie-bashing focused on herself and her family, she doesn’t use the word socialism, though it’s a fairly socialist sounding agenda.
She rejects the idea that the party is split between a harder economic left and an environmental wing.
“The temper of the times is really changing, and changing fast,” Rhiannon said. “The week before parliament I participated in four events on neoliberalism in five days.”
If Rhiannon has any grenades to lob on her way out, the pins remain in place for now.
Asked about leader Richard Di Natale, she said simply: “I support Richard’s leadership”. Does she support him over others in the party for the position or just generally?
“Generally.” Then a short and slightly awkward laugh. That’s all she’ll say for now.
Whether Rhiannon’s defeat is a personal loss or an ideological statement is hard to read. All sides acknowledge she was hampered by a feeling it was time for renewal — left or otherwise — in NSW.
“Faruqi never pandered to [Bob Brown’s] critiques of Rhiannon, instead being a consistent supporter of NSW democratic structure,” Jim Casey, a Rhiannon supporter and former candidate for Grayndler, said.
“It would be a mistake to assume the vote for her represents an endorsement of the line run by Brown.”
For her part, Farqui describes the Greens as “the major left-wing force in Australian politics” and points to her own record as an “activist, unionist and trouble-making parliamentarian”.
While Brown and his supporters in NSW are talking up a sunny future of unity, increased membership, and growing support, the truth is that the internal contradictions that centred on Rhiannon have not disappeared overnight.
Long after she’s gone, disagreements about the party’s economic policies, relationship with unions, and internal structures in particular will persist.
finally the greens are moving into the real political world, the days of bright eyed one vision politicians is dead, now the greens can become a real force in australia`s middle ground, a future coalition with labor in government is now not a dream but a distinct probability, there`s no room for extreme rights or lefts in politics and the demand for a fair distribution of the nations wealth and prosperity will not be ignored, the incessant demand that workers work harder and longer for less so that the wealthy can steal more and more of the nations wealth are coming to an end, the fracturing of the liberal and national parties are coming sooner than expected but the voters are more educated to the trickery, lies and corruption now.
Essential poll from yesterday…Labor 55%, Coalition 45% 2PP…DREAM ON about your ‘coalition with Labor’. We don’t need your 9-10% vote, thank you!
Added to that…in the aforementioned poll…the majority want a STABLE one party government. NOT a bunch of minor parties jointly forming government…that just leads to instability and nothing being done. So…good luck with that!!
Err, that 45/55 split is 2PP, right. That means the “9-10%” you don’t want has been allocated to one of the parties. Now which one, CML?
I don’t think a coalition will ever be possible, the distrust and bad feeling between the Greens and Labor is to strong. In the inner west of Sydney where I live, the two parties despise one another, with a level of anger and hatred which I find quite strange. I mix with both groups (and Liberals too), so I do know this…
Funnily enough though, on the streets of Balmain (we have a Greens MP) Liberal voters and Greens voters have more in common with each other than Labor voters. There aren’t many of the latter left in Balmain, or in any of the rich inner city electorates the Greens are in contention to win. Maybe that coalition will be something you least expect, Brian!
The 9%-10% Greens vote has NOT been ‘allocated’ to the Labor Party…let’s just get that straight. The VOTERS have decided who they prefer if the Greens don’t make it…its called preference voting, and long may it exist so long as we have troublesome minor twits who will NEVER form government, and just like to hear their own voice and cause upset.
However, you make a good point…the Greens voters live in the more affluent inner city areas and tend to co-habit with Liberal voters, rather than Labor. It doesn’t take much imagination to realise that the Greens will inevitably agree more with the Libs, as time goes by…and hopefully, they will disappear like the Democrats who have already tried this trick!!
I think you’ll find that 2PP figure includes over 80% Green preferences to Labor, its not if there will be a Labor/Green coalition but when
And multi party coalitions are commonplace across the developed world including the very stable and wealthy countries of northern Europe, its only the English speaking democracies that cling to the perverse 2 party system that delivers such mediocre outcomes
Bullsh+t!! ALL of the countries of northern Europe who have gone down this route end up with NO government for months on end…the latest being Germany.
If you think that is a good way to run a country…go for it. Absolute chaos and NOTHING gets done, because no one can agree about anything.
The USA is also in chaos at the moment, but that is because of an individual…normally their two party system works well, and they seem to have managed to stop this stupid vote splitting nonsense. All power to them…after they get rid of the troublesome ‘individual’!!
Hang on CML, the ALP/Greens Gillard Labor government was an excellent and productive ‘coalition’ government – regardless of your perverted views. How much legislation was passed? How well did the PM put down the running dog Abbott? The carbon tax (or whatever you want to call it) was the best thing that ever happened in the assault on climate change but apparently you don’t want to own it. Shame on you and get used to multi-party government.
Down with diverse views, look how well we did when the Rodent controlled both Chambers.
None so blind as them wot will not CML.
CML as long as labor tries to stand alone facing a growing coalition of extreme right wing ideologues the harder it will be to hold power, in a 2pp political system the vested interest groups know standing as many so called independent candidates as possible controls the result, e.g barnaby joyce in new england, the centre left must combine or disappear under the weight of power and money used to manipulate the system, it should be one vote on value and publicly funded elections to get a truly democratic result but it inn`t and wont be so commonsense should prevail for the common good.
Sad to see Lee go. We needed a true socialist , not afraid to stick up for her principles and her Israeli stand admirable
The deracination of the Greens, with principles hammered out over a couple of decades will continue so long as the Black W(r)iggler remains the leader.
He so wet himself with glee on the occasions when duchessed by Talcum (Senate voting reform, Gonski) that he would have sold his first born to be allowed to play.
It is ever thus – all movements are taken over by the trimmers & tackers & toadies, those who turn up and stay and stay at every boring committee until everyone with a life and sense has gone.
@ Hugh McColl…so I have ‘peverted’ views just because I don’t agree with you?
Very democratic of you.
Perhaps you could enlighten us all on what happened to the Greens -led over the top carbon tax? Gone the moment rAbbott arrived…so no one benefitted for long.
Now…if the bloody Greens had been less pure and allowed Rudd’s. ETS to pass way back when, it would have been so entrenched that no one could have removed it.
But…you just keep on keeping on…and NOTHING will change.
Oh you’ve got to be kidding CML,it seems your hypocrisy knows no bounds. You of all people complaining about a lack of democracy from someone because they say your views are perverted ?
You who constantly rants in a cap-locked tirade of abuse and insults if anyone dares to offer the slightest criticism of your beloved ALP ,let alone if they have anything to say in support of any other party for any reason at all. “Stupid,moronic,idiotic, bullshitting, brain dead “ and so on and on and on you go. The blind faith of your one-eyed,rusted-on, evangelistic and wildly aggressive support for the ALP would make a monk jealous and would probably scare off more potential ALP voters than it would ever win over.
You’re not even interested in democracy or two party politics, you crave a one house – one party system and probably with parliament based in S.A. and every one else and every where else be damned.
Considering all the new votes that are guaranteed, according to the interfering interstate connivers, by putting Lee second on the Senate ticket, what’s the possibility that two Greens NSW senators get up at the next election?
The new voters for The Greens plus all those who voted for Lee the last couple of times, just the thing to put the nose of that Terra Nullius Society founder’s nose right out of joint.
(Terra Nullius =Wilderness, get it? Whoosh?)
Oh and let’s not forget that those original founders of “conservation parks” were the Norman conquerors of England.
Here’s hoping that this ascendant new church of the environment remains broad enough to “conserve” grass roots democracy and economic as well as social justice; as principles not fucking “pillars” please, you pathetic Tree Tory pillocks.