Ged Kearney, Labor candidate for the Batman byelection, has refused to say that a Labor government would stop the Adani Carmichael coal mine — even if a future Labor government had a “trigger” that would make it possible.
Kearney was speaking at a “climate-off” amid the splendid, golden Edwardian décor of the Northcote Town Hall, in the heart of Batman, with speeches and Q and A from Kearney, Greens candidate Alex Bhathal, and three minor-party candidates.
Kearney was repeatedly challenged on Labor’s shifting position on the Adani mine, with Bill Shorten having taken three distinct positions over past weeks. She took a strong line on the “sovereign risk” that could be created if the Carmichael mine were to be blocked unilaterally.
However, the mine’s approval could be revoked through the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (the EPBC) if new evidence of environmental damage is found. A questioner noted that section 145 of the EPBC gives room for revocation if “substantial new information” comes to light.
The questioner quoted the advice obtained by the Queensland Environmental Defenders Office, which said that back-to-back coral bleachings constituted unprecedented events related to underwater ocean heating, and sufficient to trigger section 145.
Kearney waffled a little about lawyers having 20 different opinions. As protesting voices arose from the crowd, she said: “I’m not saying we wouldn’t use it [section 145].”
That’s a pallid statement that fell well short of the mood of the meeting, from Green and Labor supporters alike: looking for someone who would fight the pro-mining factions in the party, who will die in a ditch to keep Adani smoking on. The Greens have made an unequivocal commitment to opposing the Adani Carmichael mine.
After more waffling, and more dissent from the audience, Kearney said: “I’m saying … we would use it …” But it appeared to this observer to be pure course correction, based on the negative audience reaction — and expressions of dismay on the faces of a group of LEAN (Labor Environmental Action Network) members who had turned out in force for the event.
Labor’s multi-function positions fit in with Bill Shorten’s behaviour over past months: giving wildly different versions to anyone who asks. He has previously told crowds in Batman that the case for Adani had not been made, and “doesn’t stack up”.
He told crowds in Dawson on Queensland’s coal coast that it was “just another mine”, echoing the words of pro-Adani CFMEU mining division head Tony Maher; and he allegedly told businessman and environmental campaigner Geoff Cousins that the mine would not go ahead.
But he has also trumpeted his credentials as a union rep for miners, and for three years he employed as his chief-of-staff Cameron Milner, a former Queensland ALP state secretary, and a lobbyist for Adani. Milner is once again a lobbyist for Adani, through his Next Level group.
During his tenure as campaign manager for Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, Next Level remained contracted by Adani. Though not employed by the ALP, Milner remains a close confidante of Shorten’s.
The pair have known each other for 30 years, having been introduced in student politics by Andrew Landeryou, the former bankrupt whom Shorten relies on for political gopher duties. Milner’s access to Shorten’s inner circle means that Adani will always have an advocate at the centre of the current Labor leadership.
Furthermore, Shorten has become increasingly dependent on the new CFMEU/Industrial Left-Centre Unity factional grouping, for his survival as leader of the opposition, against the national “Left” of the party, and an Anthony Albanese challenge.
Kearney’s refusal to state that Labor would take an immediate opportunity to kill the mine, in a byelection, which has become about Adani, is surely an indication that there is no guarantee that Labor would stop the mine, once elected.
Kearney was generally the more confident and forceful speaker on the night, with a big line in past experience, telling the audience of around 200 that she had been “in the room” when key deals on transitioning out of coal and brown energy were created. However, several attendees, including Labor supporters, told Crikey they found her manner a little false. “Tub-thumping” was how one described it.
Bhathal’s speech, which had a very Greeny rave about Batman becoming an “electric transport hub” — part of a “positive”-oriented campaign, being criticised by some within the state Greens, as failing to take the fight to Labor — was described as “spacey” by one Greens supporter. However, many seemed to find her conversational direct style more appealing.
But given Bill Shorten’s entanglements with the mining union, with Adani itself, his own six different opinions on the matter, and Kearney’s refusal to unequivocally commit to fighting Adani in the party, and in cabinet, the question has to be asked: if Adani were a factor in your vote in Batman, why would anyone trust Labor to make a real effort to stop it?
The Batman byelection is on March 17. Subject to the result, Anthony Albanese’s leadership campaign makes its public debut on March 18.
Disclaimer: Your correspondent had a rather forthright confrontation with Ged Kearney at a public dinner in 2017. The Darebin Climate Action Network has a full video of the evening on its Facebook page — of last night’s climate debate, not the confrontation — for readers who want to judge Kearney’s effort for themselves.
‘…an Anthony Albanese challenge’ ??
If memory serves correctly, the resurrected PM Rudd guaranteed his own protection by having ALP rules changed, ensuring there can be no challenge. The Labor leader can opt to resign but cannot be formally challenged.
1. What have the Greens achieved after gaining the state seat of Northcote? zilch.
2. What will they achieve if they win Batman? zilch.
3. What about their declining share of the vote in recent elections on the mainland and Tasmania?
4. What happens when the lid comes off the simmering tensions re. member accusations of bullying?
5. How secure is Di Natale?
I am looking forward to the Greens explosion on March 18. Should be colourful.
Substitute Labor for Greens and the answers won’t be that much different.
Substitute Labor for Greens and the answers won’t be that much different.
What have they achieved? They’ve forced the ALP to move left defensively… they’ve achieved voluntary assisted dying, safe injecting rooms etc, because the ALP has to compete with them.
Ooops, just checked the 2013 changes, there can be a challenge:
The support of 75 per cent of caucus is required to force a ballot against a sitting prime minister, which drops to 60 per cent for a Labor opposition leader.
The idea of an Albanese leadership challenge is laughable for many reasons; all these Shorten-haters in the media (where it is Rundle here or Katharine Murphy in the Guardian) and Liberal Party stooges are literally the only ones talking it up. It’s not news reporting, but it’s revealing of the lengths to which the writer’s bias runs.
The ALP should concede Batman now based on Kearney’s useless performance.
If the ALP want to remain relevant they need to focus on the outer suburban seats and regional and rural Victoria. Leave the inner irrelvant seats to the Greens and other useless parties.
If not the ALP will be wiped out at the next Victorian state poll.
Kearney is all waffle. Enough of these stupid celebrity candidates.
Andrews leads today’s Newspoll by a comfortable margin.
Some of you Greens supporters have an outsize idea of how much most of Victoria is on your side.
The idea of Labor being irrelevant in Victoria because Greens voters in Batman are upset with them on one issue is a joke.
“Your correspondent had a rather forthright confrontation with Ged Kearney at a public dinner in 2017. ”
Not surprised by this. Remember his disgraceful behaviour re. David Feeney (like him or not)?
Don’t expect an even-handed treatment of the by-election by this anti-ALP, pro-Green commentator.
For the Greens opposing Adani is like shooting fish in a barrel because they will never be in government. Its also all so easy to do a bit of bush lawyering on s.145. As a percentage of world CO2 output (the threat to the Reef) what would Adani represent? Not much and by itself it would be unlikely to constitute a “significant impact” as required under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Otherwise we would be shutting down coal mines all over Australia!
Realistically that’s what all these anti-ALP on Adani commenters want, no more coal mines.
There’s no point bending over backwards to accomodate their demands for Labor to condemn Adani because the goalposts will just be shifted to a moratorium on coal mines or even to shutting down all coal mines, and then they’ll still vote Greens because it’s easier to sit on a high horse when that horse never has to walk the walk, only talk the talk.
Maybe you should get all your mates to vote Greens, so then the bastards would have to walk the walk.
Serve them right, wouldn’t it!
These talking horses of whom you speak… interesting delusion, almost akin to the thought of a Labor party committed to benefitting the working class.
Labor is hiding on Adani, as it is with the TPP and a bunch of other topics. It wants to be the policy ‘everyman’ on every topic.
Voters aren’t that stupid. Your word can equally be assessed by what you DON’T say as much as what you do.
To quote Groucho Marx: “Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them… well, I have others.”
This has nothing to do with principles.
Every political party releases its policies on most issues in the lead up to a general election…which is at least 12 months away. The Labor Party is no exception.
This absolute obsession with Adani is mind-blowingly boring…the bloody mine is NOT going to proceed for all the reasons that many, including Bill Shorten, have already detailed. The Labor Party is not willing to satisfy the Greens beat-up, because there are legal, possible compensation and sovereign risk issues involved which will be sorted out once they are in government and have access to all the required detail. If the people of Batman can’t see that, then I feel sorry for them.
How come the Greens aren’t attacking the current government over Adani? They are the ones who signed the contract and agreed that said mine could proceed.
Labor had NO part in that scenario. But NO…it is just putrid politics by the Greens, which frankly, I find distasteful in the extreme!!
Yeah, sure, the party which went to the last election with more big policies than any opposition in years, which staked out a pretty daring position on the negative gearing sacred cow, made big commitments on health and education etc, that’s the policy “everyman on every topic”. What bullshit that is.