The Greens were hit with a fresh “leak” in Batman at the end of last week, with accusations in the ABC — denied by the Greens, and lacking documentation — that Batman candidate Alex Bhathal had been investigated for improper conduct five years ago. Greens leader Richard Di Natale has denied this, and openly stated that there is a force within the Darebin Greens who would rather see the Greens miss out than have Alex Bhathal bumped into parliament.
What’s frustrating for many in the Victorian Greens is that everyone knows who the leaker — or the principal leaker — is. They’re a Darebin branch member with long experience in the Greens, they have contacts in the mainstream media, and they know how to drip-feed stories to maximise a news cycle. The Greens should expect another bombshell to be leaked on Wednesday night for the Thursday media cycle, the usual final drop, made so late, that a rebuttal is impossible.
The leaker has loathed Bhathal personally for some years; but they have also played a role as a mentor to a number of young people joining the Darebin branch, especially those lacking any sort of left-right political understanding of earlier eras.
[Greens split ramps up as insiders move against Alex Bhathal]
“These people don’t actually understand what they’re saying,” one Darebin member told me. “They say “branch stacking’ by which they mean signing up new active members made from personal contact.”
There’s also a political split of sorts: “Alex has a manner that is forthright,” this member said. “She tells you what she thinks of your ideas, or your position, if she doesn’t agree with it. But it’s not bullying. It’s just not middle-class politeness”.
Many of the 18 complainants concerning Bhathal are increasingly from a (minority) part of the Greens that sees no dynamic connection with left concerns.
These problems are the price of political success, as new members flood into the Greens — and also of a centrist drift that will occur as an older left-green phalanx steps back from the party.
But leaking to wreck a political campaign is something else. The leakers are convinced they can do it because the seat will then fall to a new Greens candidate when it comes around in 2019. That is a pious hope.
This is a rare vacant contestation, incumbency gives a 3-5% advantage, Kearney is a credible local member, Labor would promote the hell out of her, and the pork would pour. Bhathal has a huge local presence and respect, and an appeal to many left-Labor voters that a nu-Green wouldn’t.
For Labor, Kearney winning in Batman would give them breathing space to recalibrate their whole strategy as regards the inner-city — currently being done on the fly should Shorten lose and go in 2019, Labor could remake itself with Tanya Plibersek or Penny Wong (moving to the Reps) as a Jacinda Arden type leader — effectively acknowledging that the knowledge-class and its values are generalising rapidly. Batman would hold; so would Wills to its East; and Grayndler in NSW. Perhaps for quite a while.
People have got to go — a reasonable number of them — and sometimes on the balance of probabilities, not with presumption of innocence. The party needs reshaping. Otherwise what chance does it have of moving forward? There’s an old Aussie expression…
Disclaimer: this correspondent shared a house with Alex Bhathal for three years in the ’80s, can attest to her forthrightness, and once gave her a positive personal reference. He also had a forthright public argument with Labor candidate Ged Kearney in 2017. If there was a Liberal candidate, there’d probably be some crap there too.
Green surely is a wasted vote in Batman. A choice between
1. A progressive woman that can affect change as part of Government v
2. A progressive woman that casts a protest vote sitting next to Bandt.
Any real action on progressive issues need to be through the Government benches – throwing stones from the sidelines won’t help anyone in Batman except the candidate who gets a pay increase on the 5th attempt
You do know how parliament works, don’t you, Ricky? A minority government is workable. And I’m not sure that vacillating over Adani is so very progressive.
its ok for Greens to say pork would pour. with no real proof. but 18 people comment about her bullying and its called forthrightness … this what they said about Kevin Rudd.. how about an expose on her actual local policies for Batman.
its ok for Greens to say pork would pour. with no real proof. but 18 people comment about her bullying and its called forthrightness … this what they said about Kevin Rudd.. how about an expose on her actual local policies for Batman.
As I predicted. The Greens exploding after Saturday will be colourful indeed.
Oh no! Everything the Guy has been telling us about for years – the triumph of the “knowledge class” and the ascension of The Greens, is now NOT going to happen! Tanya or Penny will rule the country, and Albo will keep Grayndler. Damn! What a tragedy.
And all because a “number of young people” who “lack any sort of left-right political understanding” have joined the party.
Bloody young people. Especially the ignorant ones.
But seriously… This is what passes for political analysis in Crikey?
Read the article again. I said the knowledge class is growing so rapidly labor has to shift left to accommodate them – not just in the inner city, but everywhere. The argument is strengthened, not weakened
Got it. Guy, fair call… Here’s a more considered response. I’d like to know how the “knowledge class” differs from what C Wright Mills called “the power elite” – those who ran the dominant institutions of a dominant society? He was writing some time ago of course – long before we all unconditionally surrendered to them, even giving up (quite willingly) our very identities. I seem to remember some resistance to that back in the 70s – maybe you, some Crikey readers, and the more elderly Greens party members in Darebin do too.
The top 5 corporations in the US are (in order) Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook. What happens in Batman is irrelevant, surely. The “power elite” (ok, call them the knowledge class if you like, that certainly sounds nicer) has already won. And anointed its heirs.
The clue’s in the name: the “Power Elite” had power.
The knowledge class might have degrees and work in IT etc, but that doesn’t give them political power. I don’t think Guy is referring to the likes of Bill Gates or Zuckerman.