data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/153e8/153e8adc1b794809a1145c7b4a05a72916f586a2" alt=""
Early this morning, Leigh Sales was moved to publicly thank viewers for their reaction to an interview conducted with best-selling US author James Comey. The 7.30 presenter did not describe the majority nature of responses to last night’s broadcast, but, instead, their volume — “huge amounts”. Still, it’s safe for us to suppose that this grateful Sales was not beset, as she so often is, with assessment of her wardrobe. We might suppose she was thankful for huge thanks.
At the time of writing, few appraisals of the Sales performance have been published. But an early sign that the praise of the many may continue by media comes from News Corp, which chose simply to recount the interview, reserve all the poop generally spent on the ABC — “cultural Marxist”, “elite”, “unnatural soldiers in the war against gender” etc. — and even used the verb “grill” to describe the Sales technique. Almost a compliment.
Australians. We do tend to unite for any local success abroad.
I guess the thing was a success. Certainly, Sales did not embarrass herself, i.e. did not pull a Ferguson and wash the feet of our newest prophet-from-the-hegemon with her perfumed hair. But, to find true success with Comey is difficult for any journalist.
This is, in no small part, due to Comey’s FBI training. A dirty organisation defined by Hoover demands its clean-looking leaders. The illegal wiretaps of the 1950s became the warrantless privacy invasions, approved by Comey, of the Obama era. J Edgar’s private files on DC figures, and these include the “Sex Deviates” program of instrumentalised homophobia, became the Steele Dossier Comey described to Trump.
But, gee, Comey came across like a true patriot when describing his file full of piss. As Comey recounted to Sales the conversation he had with Trump about the dossier, he managed to (almost) appear terribly upright and to (almost) conceal his great contempt for the President. He wasn’t pulling a Hoover, you see, and threatening a political figure with exposure. No. He was doing the responsible thing and he even told the President that he didn’t care what was in those files.
Oh, sure. This bloke who wrote his dissertation on the importance of Christian morals in political life didn’t care about wee. Sure, this guy who has previously donated to the campaigns of Romney and McCain is above politics — he repeated this often, and the claim went more or less unchallenged. Really, Leigh. Hoover once appeared to the American people like a straight-shooting public servant with no allegiance but to freedom, impartiality and justice, too.
Perhaps when one is conducting an interview with a blockbuster author, there is no little coercion by publicists to address the contents of that author’s book. But, there was nothing, really, to stop Sales truly “grilling” Comey beyond the limits of what he had set down in print, and what most media outlets like to believe. That is: institutions like the FBI will survive the brutal authoritarianism of Trump. As though such institutions do not have long, documented histories themselves of brutal authoritarianism.
Sales questioned only the integrity of Comey — one of the world’s leading mimics of decency — and not of the FBI. Sales did not ask Comey if the Steele dossier was trustworthy — they just both went on as though it were and as if Comey had not previously been reported to doubt its authenticity. As for the Russia stuff. Again, here — and even despite Comey’s, perhaps inadvertent, statement that no evidence linking Trump to the Kremlin had been found after more than a year of investigation — the involvement of “Russians” in, well, just about everything rotten was taken as red.
There’s a lot more to this Comey fellow than his book. I’ve only skimmed it, but it appears to me a rather prideful document in which the former director compares his own grace and good taste with the vulgarity of Trump, which, of course, is why it will sell. Who doesn’t love a bit of classism disguised as nobility? (Well, people who voted for Trump, I guess.)
And, gee, there’s a lot more to this era in US politics, described by Sales last night as “historic”, than Russia, pee, “hacking”, the careers of powerful technocrats etc. Comey was “grilled” more lightly than the tuna in Clinton’s salade nicoise. Just the latest “explanation” for a political result mediocre journalists refuse to assess in political terms.
When Hillary herself arrives here next month to deliver her “inspirational” pap about caring for children and bombing Libyans, we can expect a replay of this reflex borrowed from US media. Sales is hardly alone in failing to see the forest for all those Why Hillary Lost books made by its individual trees.
I did not watch the interview because I cannot stand Leigh Sales, but can’t say I am surprised by this critique. Don’t think I have ever heard her ask an insightful question, and she gallantly avoids any follow-up digging into her interviewees statements even when it is blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain.
Some time ago I ranted to a friend that Comey opened up the investigation of Hillary 2 weeks before the election because he was betting on her winning anyway and he wanted to look even handed after giving her a free pass earlier at the behest of Lynch and ultimately Obama. Guess what? Thats basically what he said in his book!!
The guy is a narcissist who does not even realize his admissions as a political player. His leaking of his notes of a meeting with Trump to his mate with instructions to leak to the press is not leaking according to Comey. He saw it as an act of higher purpose. Hello??? This guy admits he is not perfect. He lied to people about being a top school basketballer at his 6ft8 height and they believed him. Faaaa…..++++rk
You’re right – Leigh Sales is a barely adequate interviewer who seems to be under-prepared and less than enthusiastic in most of her work.
I’d love to see an examination, maybe in Crikey, on why the ABC persists in trying to give individuals tenure and attempt to create ‘stars’, rather than rotate it’s talent with respect to subject matter for example.
Barbara Waters she ain’t. For which we all,perhaps, should be grateful but perhaps a skerrick of Nancy Drew would not go amiss?
Unwatchable, H, right from the moment it was first trumpeted (HA! cheap, I know).
Ferguson did a lot of us a favour, back when she interviewed Killary – she destroyed the last remaining vestiges of the myth that the ABC still ‘do’ journalism.
That might sound harsh, but more and more like me are tired of majority media practitioners pissin’ about, while the major life threats either get ignored, or are messaged away in a hail of mediocrity and narrative compliant job preserving tripe.
Real journalism? This is real journalism, from a real journalist;
https://www.mintpressnews.com/the-white-helmets-tried-to-recruit-roger-waters-with-saudi-money/240736/
Roger Waters didn’t just provide Max Blumenthal with the details of the attempts to have him join ‘the lobby’, he got up on stage and denounced it, and all who sailed on that ship.
It may have changed since earlier today but, when I had a look, the only Western media outlet to make mention of this attempted corruption of the public mind was the goddamn Daily Mail!
I mean, come on! Ol’ Roj is a music legend!
Oh, BTW, Maxie has a new doco on the way – https://killinggaza.com/trailer/
Watch the 2nd of the 2. It’s a bit longer, and opens with a brilliant representation of how modern media really functions.
Edit; “major Western media outlet”.
I have stopped watching 7:30 so I was not one of the 1.07 million viewers cited below. Sales is too pedestrian and lets people get way with outrageous claims and remarks by not following them up with further questions.
Instead I now watch old re-runs of Spicks and Specks on ABC 22. It’s funny, very good tempered and good natured, and informative – 7:30 is none of these.
Ye Gods, I hope I’ll never have to suffer an amateur interview like this again. Time after time James Comey turned every question into a blatent example of “Who me? Little old me?” It was James Comey- once head of the FBI, who ran Vladimir Putin, ex head of the KGB, a close second in the art of prevarication in what was a joint effort of irredimable tatt.
I watched most of it, and I don’t think much of her performances since Malcolm started kicking the ABC bucket either – but I must admit I did not apply Helen’s critical eye and a healthy application of cynicism.
Comey does come across brilliantly as Mr Nice Guy, but logic should warn you that it takes a certain amount of bastardry to get to the top of any organisation, and especially the FBI….
My thoughts too. Comey is a spot on mimic of decency, not just any old mimic. And, however light the grilling, as perceived by Helen, she did ask the obligatory difficult questions, admittedly without follow up.
Regardless of whether the Steele file notification might have been a Dulles style watch out and cooperate or else warning, Comey did have a compelling reason to tell Trump that it was out there. And Comey came across as smart enough to know that, far from getting Trump to oblige, he had also given Trump a reason to sack him.
So, yes, Sales is no Alberici but this was one of her better moments.
We must remind ourselves that the most successful con artists are Mr Nice Guy. Comey plays it with ease.
Sales’ effort was at least better than if she was ‘grilling’ a Coalition cabinet minister.