In the flurry of reports and speculation Thursday morning, Sky’s David Speers read a text from a Labor adviser saying “I’d rather face ScoMo than Dutton”. Yep, as far some people in the Labor Party are concerned, the hard-right former cop, barely holding his seat, which he’s possibly ineligible to hold, with an incredibly odd scandal hanging over his head, and fresh from the most poisonous ministry in Australian politics, is apparently the tougher opponent.
And now Julie Bishop is throwing her hat into the ring, along with treasurer Scott Morrison. Veteran political marketing strategist Toby Ralph told Crikey that Bishop would be the opponent that would worry Labor most. “If both Bishop and Morrison run they will split the vote, so they need to sort it out between themselves before any potential spill,” he said. “Bishop would be a very fresh new look for the party, and would repair the damage faster than anyone. She has far higher popularity than either Morrison or Dutton, but the party room is circumspect about her domestic abilities.”
If the moderates end up shooting each other in the foot, what will Labor’s plan be if Dutton ends up winning the leadership ballot?
Ralph said, if faced with a campaign against Dutton, Labor need only put their feet up and wait.
“Labor don’t need to do anything if Dutton wins, assuming he’s still there after his constitutional issues,” he said. “They might as well take a nice long lunch and think about the colour of curtains in their new ministerial offices.”
“Dutton, who acts like Abbott’s sock puppet, argues he will drag the party to the right. This might win back some of the One Nation and Palmer defectors in Queensland, but will decimate voter support in larger urban areas.”
Former Labor strategist Bruce Hawker said, of the possible candidates, Labor would most likely prefer to face Dutton — but only fractionally.
“The LNP hold five Queensland seats with a margin of less than 2% — including Dutton’s — and the feeling is he’s best placed to help them hold that. But for every seat he saves there, he puts another more southern seat in danger.”
However, his most obvious flaw — his disastrous stewardship of the camps on Manus and Nauru is an area Labor have gone out of their way to avoid. They would be much more likely to focus on the tenure that saw Dutton voted the worst health minister of the past 35 years by the Australian Medical Association.
And what if it’s ScoMo?
“In net vote terms Scott Morrison is far more palatable than Dutton outside the party room, but that’s where the decision gets made, and they seem to be worried about themselves rather than those they represent,” Ralph said.
Hawker agreed that saying Morrison was a “less abrasive and divisive” candidate, but stated Labor would still have “plenty to work with”. “His real weak spot is he’s the architect of the big business tax cuts which have just failed. And either way, they’ll just be relentlessly hitting the liberals with ‘instability, chaos, infighting’.”
Ultimately, Ralph thinks the Coalition are too far gone whoever takes over.
“In a country that is actually doing very well, government has failed to establish a coherent narrative, and through this debacle massive damage has been done. It’s pathetic, and a gift to Labor.”
Is there any redemption for the Liberal Party? Email your responses to boss@crikey.com.au.
Well, Remember Bob Hawke, who once said that a Drovers dog could run the country. Bob made Bill Hayden the Governor General.
My memory must be faulty…I was sure Hayden made that comment.
Hayden actually said a drovers dog would win the 1983 election, which was Hawke’s case for knifing him.
actually I think it was Bill Hayden himself who said that
I suggest there are 2 related considerations: (1) keeping the Coalition coalesced, and (2) winning the electorate.
I suspect that Dutton would be very divisive within the Coalition as well as within the electorate and would provoke Coalition destabilisation within a month of being elected leader.
I suspect that Bishop would be destabilised within the Coalition by the same wretches who destabilised Turnbull.
So I think Labor would least prefer Morrison as Coalition leader, tho as the piece notes, he’d still be easy prey.
‘same wretches’ you mean Abbot Abetz Andrews et al?
I don’t think Dutton would be as divisive as people make out – remember he has had divisive portfolios – at least he brings a down to earth coppers approach to problems . He would adapt to the position.
Unlike the ‘sophisticated ‘ failure who occupies the position now and wakes up each day and looks for the latest trend to follow. He has never been a leader.
Dutton walked out on the bipartisan apology to the stolen generation, which had nothing to do with his divisive administration of immigration and domestic security.
The AMA-hardly a bunch of Lefties-labelled him the worst Health Minister in 35 years. His divisive approach to the apology to the Stolen Generation & the issue of African Migrants in Victoria go well beyond his most recent remit as Immigration Minister.
You claim he would be “down to earth”, yet he is a multi-millionaire, just like Malcontent, but with the same lack of a filter that Abbort suffered from…..so we’d be getting the worst of both worlds. Also, his alleged “down to earth” nature didn’t stop him from making dozens of unforced errors as Immigration Minister.
Didn’t realise that health was a divisive portfolio!
John ‘Dr Frankenstein’ Howard’s monster has completely run amok.
The current rot in Australian politics started with him.
Think Tampa, race politics etc.
Ably abetted by the ALP. Gee, thanks Kim B.
actually it was Bill Hayden who said that
I wonder why Cormann’s hat isn’t in the ring?
I think it is too early for Cormann to be considered for leader, tho he might be considered for deputy. He would have to move to the lower house to be considered for leader.
he is a Senator so unless the party does a Gorton for him and finds a seat in the House – which is unlikely the state fo disarray they are in – he cannot stand
Sundry lawyers appear to say there is no agreement between the Commonwealth and Duttons trust. If there is no such agreement what is the basis for the Commonwealth paying $2 million to that Trust? Is it done on the “usual processes of consultation” or is it a totally excellent example of bad governance?
The Solicitor-General, Stephen Donoghue:
‘For that reason, I consider that the High Court is more likely to conclude that the size of the payments made to RHT Investments is not relevant to the s 44(v) analysis, because those payments were made pursuit to statutory entitlements of particular individuals who use child care services operated by RHT Investments.’
Can’t be Bishop: she’s barren! Can’t wait to see if the media pile on to her for being a single, childless female, as they did for Julia Gillard.
It’d be interesting if her behavior as a lawyer came under the same scrutiny as Gillard’s did.
Interesting and career ending.
Gosh does that mean we are allowed to call her asbestos julie on this site? (I can quote chapter and verse not just the nickname attribute from the Medicos)