Two weeks from tomorrow, Harvey Weinstein will not care much for the calendar at all. It was October 5 last year that allegations of his several abuses were published. Since then, dozens more women have alleged that they were injured, abased or threatened by this alleged man. And since then, hundreds more alleged perpetrators have been named by legacy media. We cannot count all those personal stories of trauma written on the socials. We can say that many of these were shared by ordinary people. We can say that to all of these, the words “Me Too” were joined.
Me Too was soon called a movement. Me Too was called a global movement in a journal of foreign affairs. This was a global movement with the power to move cinema, masculinity, and work. It would move the course of history. Per the account of Gwyneth Paltrow, it had already moved Gwyneth Paltrow. It had moved Gwyneth Paltrow, and perhaps those other women whose stories of abuse were featured in quality press.
Journalists were moved by these stories. They said that Me Too was moving toward something, but they failed to specify what. Some suggested everything as the Me Too endpoint, and others said it would land on something “pivotal”, a point then narrowed to “society”.
Sure, confusion is common at the birth of any movement. But, this is not confusion. It’s reluctance disguised as awe. This is not confusion, but a place to park your questions. Better to say that it’s too powerful to predict than suggest it’s too fundamentally powerless to move.
It isn’t moving. It hasn’t moved for a year. We find it as it was last October: feminism with its political guts ripped out then stuffed with the personal story.
We now have Me Too institutions. They claim their work is political. Their work is to be as apolitical as possible.
US organisation Time’s Up says it seeks to combat abuse and harassment at work. It was founded by Hollywood celebrities and its mission is now led by a team of high-end lawyers. Which would be OK if all these people did not agree that to “change the face of corporate boardrooms” was an ambition worth having, or writing down. Which might be OK if their “political” solution to the problem of abuse at work was not left entirely to lawyers. A nation of abused workers can hope to win this pro bono lottery before testing their trauma at trial. A single worker cannot hope to join the “movement” built for her by bosses.
As for Tracey Spicer’s NOW Australia. It reads like a budget Aussie copy to me. Lawyers, possibly therapists. Correspondence urging billionaires to respect the workers they exploit. Now, you can call me comrade nanna, but I do believe the truest power the worker has is found within her mass. Call me Mrs Lenin, but I like my strike action. I believe that this can correct our conditions where polite open letters may not.
But, back to those stories, whose production remains the core work of Me Too. Is movement produced by our stories? Yes. But not that political sort.
Say we collect all our stories. We bind them in a book. We do not rest until every survivor survives inside those pages. Not until our abusers know of the trauma that they wrote. Not until you know that our stories are true. That they’ve always been true. That this is our pain and it happened.
Say that they believe us. What do we do next? What we usually do when we all acknowledge a horror. Nothing.
Me Too is an anthology of abuse. And even if we see it as it is — true, eternal sorrow — can we still claim it for our good?
I am mindful of the many whose achievement was disclosure. I understand that the story of personal trauma holds the power to heal its author. But, the traumatised author has the power to harm herself. Believe me. Here goes.
I was once a radio announcer, or “DJ” if preferred. I had death threats, I had rape threats. But I did adjust, as people do — or could, at least, before digital space and time (when the hate can be tossed in the bin or will never hit you faster than the transfer rate of fax, you can forget it). Or, you can tell yourself that this threat was sent by the nation’s worst performing thug.
In time, there was an over-achiever. He was ill. It was not his fault that he stalked me for six months. He lived with the nightmare of delusion and truly believed he and I were married — I never asked for details, but he did write that the place we had been wed was not this one, but a planet with a “ritual” way to return. Creepy, I told my boss. He wrote to me for months. I told my boss. He called me for months. I told my boss. He started showing up at the pub where I drank my lunch, so I told the boss. He sent me a jar of urine. Told boss. He walked into the office. Boss, told. This happened a lot. He would tell the folks at the ABC front desk that he was my husband, and he walked right in.
He walked into the studio as I was broadcasting. I told my boss, the human resources department, and the union. The union told the boss to get me security. I also told the boss. I went to see a shrink. I went to see another. I had panic attacks, which produced a physical conviction that my eyes would pop out of my head. I started to take antidepressants. I told my boss. My boss said that maybe I should fuck the guy because, ha, that would scare him off.
There’s a bit more to a story that I once told all the time. Just insert more coppers, more slut-shaming and one heroic escape. I lost the job, stayed in bed for a year as I kept telling the story to myself, to newspapers and medical personnel in different styles.
Ten years later, and I’ve stopped retelling the story, even to myself. I’ve crept back into the ABC, and if I think about this employer as the same employer that sent me running with restraining order and profound faith that I would soon be found dead with my eyes right out of their sockets, I wouldn’t be able to say, “This is Your ABC” and mean it.
Long trauma short, he came back. But, this time, without the imaginary wedding band. Although he had expressed his intention in writing to kill me, the boss didn’t call for security. I asked the boss to make an insurance claim for the shrink I thought I needed. The boss looked into it, told me that I didn’t have an actual job, and therefore no insurance. Which proved especially annoying, as I then lost the job I’d done for three years without knowing I never had it.
There are so many ways I have told this story. The facts don’t change — they are written in ink and live in a box I chose at Target for their storage. But I emphasise one thing, forget another or I change around the villain. It was me, for a minute. For a much longer time, it was the boss. Patriarchy played the scoundrel at some point in my 30s, and I was convinced that none of this would have happened without sexism.
I did not read widely in my ’30s — forgive me, but I was not in good health. I was in such poor health, for a time I blamed the stalker. Of course, I blamed The Media. And then I grew older, sightly better, and certainly less compelled to Tell My Story. I heard other stories. These were far more regular than the one I used to tell about Tragic Glamour DJ and her fight to the death with Misogyny. Bad backs. Broken spirits. One electrocution. Ordinary people with those ordinary struggles that had never been polished to my melodramatic standard.
Now, there’s this ordinary trick I try to teach myself, with backup from the shrink. I tell myself the truth. I tell myself the ordinary truth: I got hurt at work.
Clearly, I’ve made an elaborate exception. This is for two reasons, the first of which is petty. I am crapped off with a journalist who left me a message this week. They wanted me to Tell My Story so they could tell one for a woman who may well not want it told. I would rather tell my own stupid story again than let a stranger at it. I would talk at length to this lady of our apparently similar hurt. But, never to an audience. And only if she asked.
The second reason is just a little better. Your story has very limited power beyond you. It can sure cut you deep if you tell it poorly. It may help you heal, but this was never true for me. It may touch others lightly, or it might move a pesky memory.
It will not move the world. Your story is not a political movement. It doesn’t even qualify as a self-help movement. You know that pain of yours? It needs a lot more care than a story can provide.
The pain is the problem. The story is not its solution. This was my moving Me Too story. I told it. Nothing moved.
Until workers have the true option to say “these conditions are not safe, fix it or I am walking out” sexual harrassment will be a continual problem in the world.
You can’t rely on business to act against it’s own interests because it’s “the right thing to do.”
That is why the solution to sexual assault at work isn’t to target/punish the perpetrators (though I’d love to headbutt pricks like Harvey Weinstein) because ultimately it’s ineffective.
Harvey goes down. Harvey 2.0 comes back up.
The solution has to be targeted at empowering workers across the board through social security programs and ideas like universal housing/healthcare/basic incomes(the implementation is important, otherwise this just becomes a money vacuum for the capital class) and job guarantees.
This way the perpetrators lose the leverage that allows the direct sexual violence against their workers or allows apathy and inaction following a risk of such violence.
I am the choir of the conscious mass. You are leading me in song I know well.
When these incidents are characterized as sexist is to IMHO miss the issue entirely.
If every woman at the ABC took a stand for Helen and told the ABC to stick it and walked out things would have changed but they didn’t because not just men slut shame.
Until workers have the true option to say “these conditions are not safe, fix it or I am walking out”; they do have a choice but so few would join you, it is the choice of the many to stand aside thanking God it wasn’t them.
We have an open society with a conservative government that was elected by the majority of Australians to continue to run the most inhuman prison system for woman and children in our name.
You have conservative woman who support draconian measures against impoverished women but complain about sexism when that attitude is directed at them and WE accept this bleating as genuine not a product of their own actions.
Of course, I agree.
But it is not just me, right? Every worker is subject to exploitation and every worker is vulnerable to injury.
There have been, literally, hundreds of injuries I’ve seen acquired by colleagues in my working life. And I work in effing media! These are not just emotional but physical and when we agree that unions are “corrupt” and when unions sell out to employers etc we produce a labour market where people just have no damn rights. Including no right to strike. No real one.
And the MeToo movement completely overlooks the history of and future potential for worker organisation. By workers.
The Mundey-era BLF showed us what is possible. We don’t have to just stand up for women or whatever. We agree to stand up for whatever person or group is risking great exploitation or injury at work. Which is why the BLF was a site that joined Hunters Hill housewives to the Black Power Movement to lez-fems to builders.
Of course pre-existing bigotry will unfold at work OR be used to help in labour cost-cutting/profit-enhancing measures by bosses. In fact, companies like Toyota and business schools like Harvard’s have written this into documents for managers. It is barely disguised.
We can’t hope to just end bigotry. We can’t just ask people to have virtue. All we can do is build virtue into systems. And demand a living wage for any worker, the guarantee of medical care for any injury acquired at work and suchlike.
We take action not because such-and-such is a woman and she experienced sexism. We take it because a worker got rooted, again.
Oh. I am going on.
I absolutely agree adding that until the economic measure is not GDP but how live-able our lives are, I was going to put the Happiness index like Bhutan but though you may laugh out loud, then these insane people who only count numbers on spread sheets will be continued to be hailed as hero’s but have offered humanity nothing. Those psychopaths who support our system are the ones that choose to look on you as nothing more than what your job implies.
Ben Bernanke stated part of his success during his period in power was a strategy to keep the workers, I forget the exact term he used, on their toes and impermanence suppresses wages and supported profits and the economy. So a safe workplace is something directly opposed to what the head of the American Fed stated as his strategy for the economy.
There are many things that confront us as a society and many are spoken about by Yuval Noah Harari
http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/hack-special-podcast/10201124
While attempting to make an intellectual point I neglected to say I was horrified by your story and hope that your life has not been impacted too much by it.
I find you to be the most delightfully stimulating commentator in Australia but often wonder whether you interpretations on issues isolates you?
I always get a little sad when someone lists their solutions and a reduction of the work week, what is considered full time work, is never on it. We’re going to be stuck on 40 hour weeks forever at this rate.
Not a job guarantee lady, either.
With universal housing/health care, a basic income (provided its implemented in a context where essentials aren’t for-profit, so it’s not all just absorbed into private profit and it remains sufficient for modest standard of living into the future) who wouldn’t work a shorter week?
We don’t need to redefine full time work, we just need to make full time work non-compulsory for a reasonable standard of living and give people true choice when it comes to their work. Redefining full time work does seem like a reasonable interim step on the way to people being able to choose their work hours, though. So yeah, let’s add it to the list.
Also I like the idea of a job guarantee because it allows a floor to be placed on working conditions that isn’t dependent on there being a regulatory body looking over the shoulders of business – who are notoriously talented fibbers and book cookers. If workers are treated worse in their job than what they are guaranteed elsewhere, they would all leave and that business would fail.
That said, I’m not married to the idea of a job guarantee, largely due to the fact that it might just wind up with people doing busy work or unnecessary/wasteful production. I would hope that it was used for good work like conservation or building homes for people or public transport or healthcare etc. Real meaningful work.
Convince me why not, I suppose. 🙂
Your reasons you aren’t wedded to JG is why I oppose it, we don’t need busywork. Which is part of why I advocate for full time work week reduction.
Let’s say we fight for and win 1 less shift, 32 hour week. Baby steps. For every 4 people employed in useful jobs, a work week of 32 hours would require 1 more person be hired. Those 4 workers, now 5, all get 3 full days off a week. The 5 workers would be in a stronger bargaining position because of a labour shortage, because this would be happening across every workplace of every sector of the economy, private and public.
Meanwhile, many precarious and underpaid positions probably won’t be looking so profitable anymore, eliminating some superflous and unskilled jobs. Who needs McJobs though when the rest of the employers just needed to expand their workforce by 1.25x?
Implicit to this is a raising of the hourly wage in addition to moving the goalposts on when a worker is entitled to overtime (discouraging the employer from overusing their labour power, compensating the worker for lost free time if they agree and consent to this overuse). It’d be a 32 hour week not because work above that time is banned, but because that is the amount of work someone has to put in to get access to the means of living in the standard they’re accustomed to.
If left to chance the employers will do it by giving us crap hours and conditions, replace us with more productive machinery. We will be given only the choice of finding more work and fighting for every hour against your fellow worker in order to make ends meet. This is already the case in some sectors of the economy. Perversely, it can be found in even the most useful of positions.
It’s a long time ago now – 20 years – but I had a 28 hour (4 day) a week temporary Govt job. Money was OK, work was tangential to what I’d been aiming at, but up there, and my work was well respected by my supervisors. I could probably still be working there, but when I applied to make it a permanent position after 9 months, guess what? No go Jo! So the prospect of reduced hours was not on even back then, even in Govt positions. Off track of the main thrust of the article, but applies to this stream, I think
Also Helen, I bought Total Propaganda earlier this week and am planning to read it this weekend.
So if you talk about job guarantee I might come back more learned ‘n stuff about the why’s not of it. 🙂
Talk to you soon then, F!
Mistress of the preemptive strike against the counterrevolution! You have my admiration, Helen.
it’s a pity that the most important part of this story is only on the website. I often only read the parts of the stories that are on insider and don’t read the rest on the website – if I’ve have done that with Helen’s story I would have missed a huge part of her story and have not understood where much of her criticism of Me Too and other media campaigns was coming from.
Thanks for feedback, MD.
I am going to write MODERATOR in large letters here so your v helpful pointer is read by fine editors.
FWIW, this was a long piece. Longer than is usually published. (I try no to bang on too much, but needed extra space to “Tell My Story” to make a stronger case that my story, or your story or hers, is not change itself.) Too long for a newsletter—as you likely know, pieces are usually published in their entirety. So, perhaps key excepts from our longer pieces would be preferable to just a portion of them.
Thanks for clicking through.
Helen, I got so caught up in what I was writing I forgot the most important thing, your employer, the ABC, breached the Occupational Heath and Safety Act. They had an absolute responsibility to protect your health and safety from any risks that might arise from your work.
Being a public figure, because you were on the radio, and facing a stalker as a result of that they had a obligation to take all practicably steps to prevent threats to your safety (in particular violence) and your health (the damaging affects of the justified fear you were suffering from). The fact that after warning management that you had a possible stalker, they took no step to prevent him from approaching , indeed they allowed him access to, you at work is another breach of the Act.
I don’t know if you attempted to get worker compensation for the time you were off work and for the pain and suffering you had to endure, but if you didn’t it might be worth talking to a specialist Workers Compensation lawyer to hear what they say. Even if you are not interested in the money, a case like your’s might make companies and employers more aware of their responsibilities, and threatened workers, especially women, aware of their rights.
Sounds awful, Helen. I have been sexually harassed but only a couple of times and my employer reacted. Your case called for a criminal complaint, given the ABC boss did nothing and also the union should have given the boss a threat to strike, if the boss continued to do nothing.
The protection of silence is no longer available to predators, who are simply interested in using women. Your harasser sounds not all there, as indeed proabably were my far less serious cases. But the exposure of predators will help many women, once they realise that consequences will be more likely. But, as Christine Delphy argues, the fundamental problem remains and, as others have argued, victimhood still leaves women vulnerable to male dominated institutions and at risk of being let down as Razer was
The thing is, though, people are treated like poop at work all the time. All the time.
This is work. And we can’t rely on Good People Speaking Up to stop the bad poop. We must build virtue in to our rights as workers. So some boss cannot say to a person who is unwell, for very good reason, “our insurance doesn’t cover the injury you got at work. By the way, you don’t work here any more.”
One of your better efforts Helen. They’re worth waiting for. Sorry to read about your ordeal and sorrier that so little support was given.
I hadn’t heard this story before. For what little it is worth, I am sorry to hear it.
Ah. I am the better for it. It moved me back to belief in mass action. Also, everyone has their time of poop.
Also, I have received an informal education from the many shrinks I have seen, and still see.