Yesterday Crikey readers had a few notes to add on Bernard Keane’s article on the need to shutter and make public the broken life insurance industry. Elsewhere, readers were particularly interested in former treasurer Wayne Swan’s reflections on the Global Financial Crisis — while many readers showed their admiration for Swan’s role in the handling of the crisis, just as many took him to task for his rose-tinted nostalgia.
On the end of the life insurance industry
Dr. John Nightingale writes: I doubt that public ownership itself would solve all the problems. Let’s go back to mutuals, where the customers are the owners. Perhaps a publicly owned bank etc could keep some expertise in public hands, but I think the mutuals, like the industry super funds, would show up all the rest.
Desmond Graham writes: The royal commission has confirmed what people already suspected. What people did not know: the wholesale incompetence of the public servants employed to supervise the industries. If we extrapolate this to the rest of the commissions, they are all likely to be of the same competence. By sustaining these commissions the government is outsourcing governance — all care but no responsibility. The electorate must demand accountability to be exercised by their elected representatives.
On Wayne Swan’s reflections of the GFC
Persistently Baffled writes: We all know “you’ve never had it so good” is political suicide. Yet our dodging of the GFC bullet comes close to making that statement true. Had Swannie followed the Tory path, we wouldn’t now be looking at 27 years without recession. I was lucky enough to travel overseas in the GFC aftermath, and the effects on ordinary folks in Europe and the Americas were appalling — austerity, unemployment and gloom. This is something that Australians never really saw and, as the memory of recession gently floats away, it seems that nobody understands just how good the collective “we” have it.
Marcus L’Estrange writes: Yes, the Coalition has camouflaged their smash-and-grab assault on the social safety net but they have largely followed the Labor government in three key areas, so Wayne doesn’t come into this battle with his hands clean, nor can he cast the first stone. Wayne and other comrades, when in government in 2013, enacted a vicious class war against three welfare groups. In the Expenditure Review Committee, Wayne and others voted not to increase Newstart, which was then and is now one of the world’s lowest and hasn’t had a value increase since Paul Keating’s government in 1994. Likewise, Wayne and co. also voted to tighten up on the Disability Support Pension so that it was, and is now, extremely hard to get on. Wayne topped this off by voting to offload sole parents from their pension of $21,000 a year to $14,000 a year when their child turned eight.
Send your comments, corrections, clarifications and cock-ups to boss@crikey.com.au. We reserve the right to edit comments for length and clarity. Please include your full name.
Marcus: As I already pointed out, instead of staring down the “debt and deficit” hysteria from the opposition and their media supporters, Wayne Swan and Co. tried to “counter” it by promising a “return to surplus”, which only proved that the hysteria was justified. As a part of getting that return to surplus, various areas of spending, described by you were slashed. needlessly, as it can be shown.
The disclosures about banking and insurance industries are interesting but not unexpected. If any system had followed up the anecdotal evidence which has been appearing for decades then would we need a royal commission?
There is an obsession with hard evidence and scientific proof. We all run our lives with soft assessment of risks. When things go wrong we make corrections.
Must a complex society use methods which are the antithesis of personal learnt knowledge and experience? Inefficiencies and junk jobs certainly keep GDP growing but surely real jobs and real growth create improved outcomes and benefits
Once again that ole furphy puts you in the same category as Helen. Howard was the one who shifted single parents to Newstart after the youngest child turns 8 back on 1 July 2006. I know, I was one of them in 2007 when I separated from my husband. He grandfathered existing parents who were already on the pension, thus creating 2 tiers of benefits. Labor merely removed that discrimination and plonked all single parents on the lower rare. Mind you, I believe they should have restored the previous rate to all people.