Overnight, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh faced an explosive Senate hearing to address allegations of sexual assault and misconduct made against him. If you haven’t been keeping up with the unfolding controversy and why it’s important, here’s everything you need to know:
What’s the background context?
Over the past month, several allegations of sexual assault have been made against Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump’s nominee to the US Supreme Court. Perhaps most notable, Dr Christine Blasey Ford claimed that during a house party in 1982, a 17-year-old Kavanaugh had attempted to rape her. Ford was 15 at the time.
Kavanaugh denied the claims, but since then, a number of other allegations have been made by women against the judge. The allegations emboldened Democrats seeking to block Kavanaugh’s appointment. As a judge with Republican-approved politics, a Kavanaugh appointment would give the US Supreme Court a conservative majority for decades to come.
Read more:
What happened in the hearing?
Christine Blasey Ford went first, and recounted the alleged assault over several gruelling hours, as Crikey‘s Charlie Lewis reports. The hearing was a study in contrasts. While Ford remained relatively calm, Brett Kavanaugh was bombastic, emotional, and indignant.
Kavanaugh had already submitted a statement to the committee, but he chose to ditch it at the last minute. Instead, he began his testimony with a conspiratorial monologue where he accused the Democrats of “whipping up a frenzy on the left” to try and destroy him.
Back at The White House, Trump was riveted by Kavanaugh’s attack, reportedly telling a source “this is why I nominated him”. The President reportedly advised Kavanaugh to be more aggressive in front of the Committee, to borrow some of the President’s unhinged style.
Read more:
-
A Democratic senator tried to get Brett Kavanaugh to commit to an FBI investigation. He would not. – Vox
-
Brett Kavanaugh: ‘This confirmation process has become a national disgrace’ – The Atlantic
Reactions and reflections
Perhaps unsurprisingly, many have seen the Kavanaugh hearing as a reflection of the general partisan trench warfare so characteristic of Washington. Several Republican senators lined up to defend Kavanaugh. Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina, described Kavanaugh as a victim, and railed against Democrats, who he accused of trying to destroy his life.
Senate Republicans are committed to a final vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation on Friday, US time. But with the Senate currently split 51-49, and with the voting intentions of several key GOP senators still unclear, his confirmation is far from guaranteed.
Read more:
-
Why Brett Kavanaugh’s hearings convinced me that he’s guilty – Daily Intelligencer
-
Brett Kavanaugh and the adolescent aggression of conservative masculinity – The New Yorker
-
Brett Kavanaugh plays the victim – HuffPost
-
Brett Kavanaugh and America’s himpathy reckoning – The New York Times
-
Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, and the things men do for other men – The New Yorker
If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au. In an emergency, call 000.
Who Cares?
I care because Kavanaugh is a conservative who dismisses a woman’s right to decide on continuing with a pregnancy (or not). If elected he is very likely to overturn abortion laws and take women back a couple of decades at least. This will give those of similar minds added impetus to do the same in our country. i am so tired of having to fight the same battles over and over.
Exactly.
What is the unrelenting Australian media fetish with all things American??
Well I supposed if we’re going to send our sons and daughters into war zones at their behest, spend our GDP on weapons of war at a rate dictated by them, vote with or at least abstain from voting against their mad international policies at the UN, embrace the worst bits of their culture, get fat in their awful food outlets….then we should know at least a little bit about how their shambolic “democracy” works.
The judge doth shout too loudly me thinks.
I care. These are the people the IPA, the Abbottistas,Hansons, Bernardis, Leyonhjelms, Lathams, Blots, Jones and Hadleys model themselves on.
It’s really concerning that such an overprivileged liar is going to cause the US Supreme Court to be alt-right leaning for the next decade.
It seems that he is the perfect match for the Pussy Grabber-in-Chief.
They have the same sense of self pity, prone to hysterical overreaction to criticism and a similar respect for women in general as well as a finely honed sense of entitlement.
I won’t be in the least surprised when he enters rehab for substance abuse – his short fuse is typical of a semi functioning drunk or junkie..