LGBTIQ issues seem to occupy some weird mental territory for Scott Morrison, and have done ever since his side was trounced in the marriage equality plebiscite. It’s a hang-up his government could do without.
In retrospect, that Morrison has some obsession with LGBTIQ issues emerged just days after he became prime minister, when, out of the blue, he used social media to share a false, transphobic Daily Telegraph story, adding “we do not need ‘gender whisperers’ in our schools. Let kids be kids”. That was shortly after he agreed with broadcaster Alan Jones that classroom references to bisexuality and lesbianism “made his skin curl” [sic]. Jones himself is a supporter of marriage equality, in contrast to Morrison, who strongly opposed it. Morrison had told a constituent:
The fundamental reason for my position was well summarised by [John Howard], who stated when legislating the current definition ‘marriage, as we understand it in our society, is about children, raising them, providing for the survival of the species, and I think if the same status is given in our society to gay unions as are given to traditional marriage we will weaken that bedrock institution’. For me this is ultimately about a child’s natural right to a mother and father…
This echoes the homophobic argument from groups like the Australian Christian Lobby that same-sex parents harm their children — a claim repeatedly shown by peer-reviewed studies to be false.
Separately, Morrison also dismissed a question about “gay conversion therapy”. “I’ve never been involved in anything like that,” he responded. “I’ve never supported anything like that, it’s just not an issue for me and I’m not planning to get engaged in the issue.”
At the time this response drew some over-the-top criticism. But his understandable lack of interest in what is a third-order issue even for LGBTIQ people was in peculiar contrast to his oft-restated belief that religious freedom is under attack.
Far from being besieged, religious freedom is in rude health. Taxpayers lose billions of dollars a year subsidising it through the tax and educational systems. Churches are allowed to evade the consequences of their long history of child rape. The most offensive smears were peddled about LGBTIQ people in the marriage equality debate without consequences. There is literally no way in which religious freedom is threatened.
But Morrison has been claiming it is ever since the marriage equality debate. He complained he himself was a victim of “hatred and bigotry” in 2016. He tried to delay and amend the marriage equality bill last year to insert religious freedoms protections, arguing support for extending religious freedom protections was as high as that for marriage equality.
Since becoming prime minister, Morrison has discussed religious freedom half a dozen times — often of his own volition — and even accused Labor of “lukewarm positions on religious freedoms” while campaigning in Wentworth. He made the issue central to his first major speech as prime minister.
The inquiry into religious freedom set up by Malcolm Turnbull that is now bedevilling Morrison was established to placate him, so he has no grounds for complaint. Apparently it dismisses the lie that religious freedom is under attack, but suggests clarifying law around the ability of religious schools to discriminate against kids based on their sexuality. Morrison professed contentment with this. “It’s existing law,” he declared on Wednesday, indicating — using that weird redundancy tic he has — no desire to “take away that existing arrangement that exists”.
Just how politically toxic this idea is was shown by the speed with which a copy of the report was rushed to a friendly outlet to try to hose down the issue.
It’s also possible that Morrison’s views have been in part shaped by his religious affiliation. Hillsong used to support “gay conversion therapy”, but no longer does so, though it appears to host conversion therapy campaigners. Hillsong head Brian Houston has repeatedly claimed to share the views of St Paul on homosexuality — that it is unnatural, “shameless” and deserving of divine punishment.
Whatever its origins — from his personal faith, or because his side lost the marriage equality debate — Morrison’s obsession is problematic for the government, as Crikey noted some weeks ago. He seems to seriously think religious freedom could be an election winner against Labor, oblivious to the damage it will inflict on his own side. Morrison needs to get over it, and stop obsessing about LGBTIQ issues, for his government’s sake.
Wrong! His obsession with a stone age middle eastern myth is what is actually affecting his judgement.
Why he has that obsession is a question well above my pay grade.
“that Morrison has some obsession with LGBTIQ issues emerged just days after he became prime minister”
The rest of the article demonstrates it emerged much earlier than that.
“Morrison needs to get over it, and stop obsessing about LGBTIQ issues, for his government’s sake.”
The Liberals changed leaders precisely because they wanted to keep prosecuting these culture war issues more than Turnbull was willing to do, so that will be a hard pass.
Also, articles taking this “here’s what the Liberals need to do to beat Labour” tone and basically advocating them putting a false front on their real ideology – and even implying the media, like in 2016 , will give them a free pass again and pretend that ideology isn’t there as long as they put up that false front- are pretty tiresome.
Agreeing with Arky on his/her two final paragraphs. I really don’t want to keep reading what the Liberals should do if they want to hold government. It’s not as though they are going to change their stripes now, so what’s the point? How about an article on why x, y or z is yet another reason why the Coalition should be voted out because they are out of touch?
For some interesting vox populi thoughts, go through the comments on this article in Fairfax today:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/political-turmoil-has-hurt-australia-but-we-must-look-forward-20181009-p508nz.html
An article on why the LNP should be voted out of office would make ‘War and Peace’ look like a thin novel. Which volume would you like written first?
Failing “just because”?
If the recent revolting peasants in UK/US prove nothing else, it is that facts don’t matter, it is what people believe that they think they believe that motivates them in the polling booth.
No-one ever went broke misunderestimating the mug punter’s propensity for self harm if sold persuasively.
PJK’s mentor, the Big Fella Lang was wrong in saying “put you money on self interest coz at least y’know it’s trying” – he should have qualified self interest with “true”.
It is daily demonstrated, by what they eat, drink and do that most people don’t know their own best interest from a hole in the ground.
Again you speak for me, truly tiresome political spin, lies advice on how to win, beat Labor next election. !!
Aye. To such musings :-“Has this mob, in government, really displayed/done enough to warrant encouragement by way of another term?”
Given their “record in the mud” why would anyone want to encourage an extension of such “governance”, with tips? When does “Flogging a dead horse” come to mind.
I’m more inclined to say they need to be “turned out”/spelled – to ponder their many shortcomings.
I’d prefer the glue factory else they might come back like the Unflushable Turd with his “dead, cremated & buried” GST & SerfChoices.
Morrison said “our society is about children, raising them, providing for the survival of the species”.
If he is so concerned about the future of his children (and mine) and the survival of the species, why does he refuse to accept the scientific fact-based projected forecasts about the effects of global warming?
Failure to do so means he is lying about being concerned for his children’s welfare, but I guess when The Rapture comes then they’ll all be saved and spend eternity sitting on clouds playing harps.
Our species has survived wars, pestilence and disasters. The fact that a certain percentage of humans has always been homosexual doesn’t seem to have bothered it one whit.
Not only humans either Bref. I live with a pair of lesbian parrots. Apparently dog forgot to tell them that mating and producing eggs each year is a sin, because they’re still “at it”, twenty years later.
Needless to say, the eggs are not fertile.
🙂
No, the quote above of his leaden utterance was “marriage, in our society, is about children…” which is utterly untrue – it has only ever been about the protection of accumulated capital & property.
Never mind that the said property included wife, chattels & children in no particular order.
The key problem is that the far right can’t accept defeat. They were wrong on the equal marriage plebiscite and they need to accept that, just as all grown-up people accept they can’t always get their own way. Their relentless man-baby tantrums and dummy spits over such issues say a lot about their brainwashed sense of entitlement.
It plays merry hell with their “Born to Rule” mentality.
I heard Morrison being interviewed on RN on this matter this morning. He’s starting to sound a lot like Joh Bjelke Petersen:
“That’s the existing law. That’s the existing law … The existing law enables schools to do exactly what was in that report … Well it’s the existing law, and we’re not proposing to change that law, to take away that existing arrangement that exists …”
I fully expected him to finish off with “Don’t you worry about that”
Lols!
Sadly there will be no harps for Morrison, he will spend eternity with the worms just like everybody else…but he is certainly drumming up a lot of early business for the aforementioned worms.
Except of course in some states it is not and while ever they take the taxpayer’s shilling they have no business with such discrimination. Discriminate all you like, but get your bigoted hands out of my pocket.
“Scott Morrison Vows To Change Laws On Religious Freedom”
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/federal/scott-morrison-vows-to-change-laws-on-religious-freedom-but-won-t-be-a-culture-warrior-pm-20180907-p502da.html
Yeah, so about that “we’re not going to change anything!” bit of panic there, Scott…