Poor Simon Benson really needs to apply a bit more rigour when going through his inbox of anti-Labor drops.
Benson was humiliated earlier this year when he claimed in the Oz that Treasury had modelled Labor’s plan to end the dividend imputation rort and found a “$10 billion black hole”. Problem was, the “modelling” then-treasurer Scott Morrison’s office had dropped to him wasn’t of Labor’s policy, as then-Treasury head John Fraser subsequently admitted. Moreover, the head of the Parliamentary Budget Office, which had done Labor’s sums, hit back at the criticism.
Now Benson has fallen for the same trick, this time over a report from the construction employer group Master Builders Association. Today he claimed — “exclusively”, natch — that Labor’s negative-gearing policy had been modelled and would cause a $12 billion hit to housing. As Labor pointed out immediately, the report commissioned by the Master Builders hadn’t modelled Labor’s policy at all — they’d missed out the fact that Labor’s policy grandfathers all existing housing investment. Indeed, as Chris Bowen pointed out, the MBA report is perfectly up front about that. “The modelling does not account for the grandfathering of existing arrangements,” the MBA summary said.
It’s not as if this is the first time this has happened. If Benson had done some quick googling, he would have seen that the Housing Industry Association tried this back in April when it, too, launched a report with modelling that was covered by News Corp. “Tenants would face increases in rent under capital gains tax hike, says housing industry” — but it, too, skipped the bit about grandfathering existing investment.
Or Benson could simply have recalled some other unfounded modelling about negative gearing that he’s peddled before — like that BIS Shrapnel report in 2016 alleging Labor’s policy would cause rents to rise, a report described as “manifestly ridiculous” and which BIS Shrapnel admitted it prepared long before Labor released its policy, in a humiliating debacle for the company and the journalists who took it seriously.
Then again, if Benson paused for a moment to ascertain whether what has landed in his inbox might pass the sniff test, that might make for fewer opportunities for the Oz to bag Labor. And that would never do.
Benson really has shown himself over the years to be a try-believer in, and devoted follower of, the Sun King
true believer – true believer
I prefer ‘try-believer’.
No matter how much one might try, it is simply not possible to believe a word from the mudorc menials.
Well Frydenburg certainly believes the report…..and he would never lie to us would he?
Caught him briefly in QT today roaring with laughter on the matter….what a fine specimen he is….and Bishop in the Guardian today warning us not to be duped by dishonest politicians ( no comments allowed sadly..it would have lit up), every bit as evil as any in the LNP rabble.
Point of order? How can you be “humiliated” when you have no shame and you work for Rupert as a shill?
No doubt the Limited News Party will be quoting from this, which in turn will be quoted in Limited News – and so the “Circle of Lies” goes, in ever decreasing circles?
“Moderation”? Seriously?
No doubt the Limited News Party will be quoting from this, which in turn will be quoted in Limited News – and so the “Circle of Lies” goes, in ever decreasing circles?
Well what about :- “Point of order? How can you be “humiliated” when you have no shame ….”
“… shill”?
“… and you work for Rupert as a …..”?
“… shill”?
Why should anyone be surprised when The Oz maintains its usual standards ie: half the story or a half-baked version of the story.
Bernard, your abiding faith that Limited News Corp has any shred of journalistic quest for truth is cute. The way LNC mangles the truth and suppresses facts that are inconvenient for its right-wing culture war disqualifies it as credible in any way. But you clearly do not need credibility to be powerful.