The current political struggle in Venezuela has just entered a crucial phase, with the pressure on the embattled Maduro government becoming intense. Key European nations gave Maduro until this weekend to call new elections, or they would recognise challenger Juan Guaidó as the legitimate leader.
US Secretary of State John Bolton said Maduro and other leaders had to choose between retirement “on a beach, far from Venezuela” and Guantanamo Bay. An air force major-general defected from military support for Maduro and posted a video declaring that the rank-and-file military was opposed to the regime — but he was one figure, and not a key commander. Now Guaidó’s forces are lobbying China to switch their support away from Maduro.
Donald Trump has not ruled out the possibility of military intervention. That — by US or surrounding client-state troops — would be a godsend to Maduro, uniting large sections of the populace against the foreigners. Without that, the Bolivarian government’s position is looking increasingly shaky.
So far, the coup has gone absolutely according to script. For nostalgia buffs, it’s a good old fashioned south-of-de-border intervention, ticking off all the items on the list. Vice President Mike Pence calls Guaidó to let him know he has US support, before Maduro’s January 10 inauguration. Check.
Guaidó announces that he is in fact president, as a leader in the sidelined National Assembly, and that Maduro’s role is unconstitutional. Check.
The UK, Australia and other lapdogs come to the party (bravo New Zealand, for not). Check.
Venezuelan banking assets are frozen across the world, and offered to Guaidó. Check.
John Bolton appears with a legal pad in hand, with “5000 troops to Colombia” scrawled across it, obviously staged. Venezuela’s state-owned oil company is blockaded, and US officials openly muse on TV about what a great carve-up Venezuela’s oil reserves would be. Check check check.
Of course it all goes back further than that. As assiduous digging by Dan Cohen and Max Blumenthal has shown — much of it using the Wikileaks Stratfor and other files — Juan Guaidó is part of a generation of activists trained by CANVAS, a roving US-funded body, responsible for “colour” revolutions that tend to align with US interests. The CIA shopfront the National Endowment for Democracy helped create the Popular Will Party that Guaidó represents.
After failing to topple Chavez and then Maduro electorally, Popular Will turned to violence, becoming part of the Guarimba movement, responsible for assassinations of police and military, as well as bombings and other random outrages. Their leader Leopoldo Lopez is in prison charged with involvement in 13 killings; his imprisonment has been constructed by the global right as a “repression of democracy”.
So far the regime change forces aren’t pushing to simply install Guaidó; they want fresh elections, at which tens, perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars would be pumped into opposition parties from abroad. The Maduro government says that the opposition boycotted the last election, knowing it wouldn’t prevail, and excluded parties that had been associated with violent movements. The stories being pumped into the mainstream media about crackdowns etc may well have some truth to them — the Maduro government has become repressive in certain aspects — but they may also be pure propaganda products of the ‘babies being ripped out of oxygen tents stuff’.
Once Popular Will manage to get themselves installed in power, the great shock doctrine sell-off — of Venezuela’s publicly-owned industries, and extraction rights for its oil — will begin, together with violent retribution against Chavistas. The GDP might well recover; the poor, deprived of the numerous subsidies they still receive under the current government, will get no benefit from it.
That said, regime change is not proving quite as straightforward as the US might have hoped. The continued backing of China, the solidarity of the military, and residual support for Maduro among significant sections of the populace — wholly unreported by both public and private media in the global North — has created a stalemate. It is hard to see Maduro and his government; but it may be able to fight to a compromise, which appears to be what many Venezualans want — and exactly what Guaidó’s Popular Will Party does not.
The “pink [ie socialist] wave” in South America, is almost done. It has substantial achievements across the continent, and there are a lot of lessons to learn from it, some of them pretty melancholy. But South America has always been counter-cyclical. As the right regains power, themselves ticking every box — crush the poor, crush unions, reimpose explicit churchy patriarchy, trash the environment — the US, UK and Europe are tending leftward.
The hope would be that regimes such as Bolsonaro’s in Brazil and, if it happens, Guaidó’s in Venezuela, will quickly expose themselves as agents of repression and capital, and things will rebound rapidly. The right have no answers for the problems that face us now as nations, and as a planet. They once represented an alternative; now they sell fantasy. But it’s not over yet. Try to skin a banana republic, in our era, and you might end up on your arse before you know it.
Such a rare and important perspective. Where do you get your news Mr Rundle, presuming you don’t have your own private network of spooks? Al-Jazeera?
As I was reading Rundle, I was about to suggest he take a look at Max Blumenthal’s and Dan Cohen’s work at Grayzone.
And, lo and behold, there it was! Kudos to Rundle. Fabulous journalist, Blumenthal, truly fabulous.
If you go to Grayzone via Rundle’s link, you’ll also find a video of Blumenthal wandering the corridors of power in Washington, asking various congresspersons about Venezuela (incl the latest darling of the Democratic ‘liberal left’, AOC).
To quote from Grayzone’s intro to Blumenthal’s usual disarming of interviewees;
“The responses from members of Congress painted a shocking picture of ignorance, hypocrisy, and bipartisan consent for the Trump administration’s assault on Venezuela.”
Blumenthal really is a star of true journalism. As has become the way of these things, if you want to catch his head on more than just webcasts, you have to subscribe to Foxtel, and know that RT is Channel 658, and are about the only ones around who put the likes of Blumenthal to air, and always without predefined conditions.
Blumenthal features on the Radio WarNerd podcast at exiledonline.com
Mark Ayres & John Dolan (aka Gary Brecher) have the sanest take of past & current events available.
They ask for $5 per month to maintain the site but several downloads are allowed as free tastes.
..oops, Mark AMES at http://exiledonline.com/
Bolton is not the Secretary of State.
OK, national security adviser then. In amongst Secretaries of State and Assistant Secretaries of State he is just another particularly nasty specimen of Yanqui meddler in the affairs of other nations. Pepe Escobar hits the mark by calling him “Psycho killer”:
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/02/01/venezuela-lets-cut-to-chase.html
Another interesting analysis here:
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/02/02/time-running-out-oust-maduro.html
In essence, if a coup is not carried out quickly, Venezuelans will come to recognise that their plight is largely Washington’s fault, not Maduro’s. For now, every time I turn on the news I expect to hear that “unknown gunmen” have opened fire on crowds of demonstrators.
Do my old eyes deceive me? Is this a Putin supporter I see before me, correctly criticizing the potential Yanqui meddling in Venezuela’s affairs while defending Putin’s brazen invasion of Ukraine? Oh sorry, I forgot. Ukraine is not a real country, just a renegade part of Russia, so it’s really a Russian internal affair.
Ad hominem attack. Don’t like the message so shoot the messenger. This is tiresome but if you insist I reply point by point:
Q: “Do my old eyes deceive me?”
A: Yes. Also a befuddled, blinkered, xenophobic and uninformed mind.
Q: “Is this a Putin supporter I see before me?”
A: No. I am naturalised Aussie and a registered voter so can only “support” our local pollies. But as this is a “free country”, I am entitled to an opinion.
Assertion: “correctly criticizing the potential Yanqui meddling in Venezuela’s affairs”
A: Absolutely yes. I too am old enough to have seen the pattern of meddling at least since Vietnam.
Assertion: “Putin’s brazen invasion of Ukraine”
A: This is supposed to be about Venezuela, so you are getting confused again. But for the record, Putin did not “invade” Ukraine. Lift your blinkers and learn some facts.
Assertion: “Ukraine is not a real country”
A: Is Ukraine in Venezuela? You really are confused! A case of “non sequitur” perhaps?
Assertion: “just a renegade part of Russia”
A: “Ukraine” a.k.a. “Borderland” has been part of the Russian cultural realm since the Cossack chieftain Bogdan Khmelnitski raised a rebellion in 1654 against the rule of Poland. He freed Ukraine and preserved its national and religious identity by bringing it under Russia’s protectorate. Khrushchev’s handing over administration of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 was to commemorate the 300th anniversary of this event. It was a historical blunder that was recently corrected. Present-day “Ukraine” is a splintered mess, divided along religio-cultural lines between eastern and western regions. Rather like Palestine/Israel. I expect that “Ukraine” too will eventually have to have a “two-state solution”. That’s for them to sort out, without foreign meddling.
But hey, this is discussion is about Venezuela. Did you see President Maduro’s interview on RT today?
A lot of intensely proud Ukrainians would beg to differ
No doubt. That’s why there is a simmering civil war between east and west still in progress. The problem is so intractable that, as I said, a two-state solution may be the only option. I know something of these things. I am of Russo-Ukrainian stock and the rupture extends even to my small and dispersed extended family.
But thanks to “Oldie’s” tangential shift we have gone off the subject, which is Venezuela. Here is a link to President Maduro’s appeal, which NewsCorpse and their ilk seem not able to find:
https://russia-insider.com/en/nicholas-maduros-video-appeal-american-people-not-start-another-war-full-transcript/ri26146
Yet. The moustache is his most intelligent aspect.
Mr Iskandar, this is why I brought Ukraine into the debate. The world is currently in a very precarious situation due to three thoroughly corrupt individuals in charge of the three most militarily powerful forces in history, namely, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. Each has the power to obliterate human life on this planet. My belief is that they are all unprincipled opportunistic narcissists, gambling with the future of humanity under the pretense of making their respective countries ‘great again’ while only being interested in their own self-preservation and enrichment. Whenever I see someone criticizing one while praising the other I feel obliged to point this out, hence my suggestion that correctly criticizing Trump while condoning Putin is unsustainable.
As for Ukraine, my understanding is that it has historically been influenced equally by Poland, Austria (Hapsburgs) and Russia, and since 1991 has been struggling to establish itself as an independent state, something Putin does not want to happen. Whatever the outcome, I doubt that Ukrainians will ever forget Stalin’s genocidal attempt to annihilate them and it seems that currently a clear majority, especially the younger generation, feel far more comfortable with Poland, despite the toxic political situation there, than with Putin. The forthcoming elections there may help clarify the situation.
No need for the title “Mr”. “Iskandar” is just the Middle East version of “Alexander”, my first name, under which I submit my views. Call me “Al” if you wish.
We are off topic again, so I’ll keep this short. You are entitled to your views of course, but being particularly knowledgeable on this subject I have to say that they are essentially “received wisdom”, the result of consuming too much officially sanctioned news and history. In search of the truth I cast my net far wider. Consequently, I disagree with most of what you say above, especially about putting Putin, Xi and Trump in the same basket. The first two are genuine patriots, the third, well, the highly visible symptom of a deep sickness in the US body politic.
I have no wish to go further down this rabbit hole with you. You can do that yourself, so I offer you one particularly interesting read to begin with:
http://dxczjjuegupb.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/TheKillingOfWilliamBrowder_PrintLayout_6x9-1.pdf
This is a free download of a book that certain interests have been trying to suppress. If you read it you will know why.
OK, I’ll accept your description of Putin and Xi as true patriots as long as you accept my preference for the famous definition of patriotism as “the last refuge of a scoundrel”, although I still would like to include Trump with them.
Sorry to split hairs, but here is the origin of the phrase from Wikipedia:
“In 1774, (Samuel Johnson) printed “The Patriot”, a critique of what he viewed as false patriotism. On the evening of 7 April 1775, he made the famous statement, “Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.” This line was not, as is widely believed, about patriotism in general, but the false use of the term “patriotism” by William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham (the patriot-minister) and his supporters. Johnson opposed “self-professed patriots” in general, but valued what he considered “true” self-professed patriotism.”
The dictionary defines a patriot as “a person who loves, supports, and defends his country and its interests with devotion.” Trump talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk. You can’t say that about Putin and Xi. Did you perchance watch Oliver Stone’s “The Putin Interviews” when they ran on SBS? Well worth watching, or reading the book, which is more detailed.
Problem is that by deluding themselves that they ‘love’ their country when they really just love themselves, they are destroying their country. Tell me, what’s going to happen to Russia when Putin goes, which he will have to do sooner or later? It will fall into chaos. If he had the slightest love for his country he would be trying to build up sustainable institutions instead of tearing down any that might diminish his power both inside and outside Russia while trying recreate some 19th century fantasy like Novorossiya.
I’ve no idea, and have no authority to answer such a question. I’m a distant observer and nothing else. Why don’t you ask VVP himself. Here’s the website:
http://en.letters.kremlin.ru/
Hey maybe the EU should ask poor old Macron to move over and let the yellow jackets take over. France definitely in need of a coup, if only they were red jackets Trump could offer military support
So Guaido went to the kindergarten of the Americas .. the US have not been a force for good in the Latins and Venezualians need to have a good look at Trumps first speech a Langley where he blathers on about stealing oil..
Great interest in Venezuela, little in Zimbabw. .
Great mates in Saudi Arabia, none in Yemen.
Common denominator OIL.