Another lot of ratbag comments from Alan Jones, another half-hearted apology.
Jones’ spray against Jacinda Arden has landed him another whacking with a wet fish from Macquarie Media management. As Nine’s Sydney Morning Herald reported on the weekend, “Alan Jones’ contract will be terminated if he makes any more remarks similar to his demand [that] Prime Minister Scott Morrison confront New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and ‘shove a sock down her throat'”.
That message came from Macquarie Media chairman Russell Tate. “Notwithstanding [Jones’] apologies, I have today discussed the matter with Alan and advised him that any recurrence of commentary of this nature will result in the termination of his contract,” he said.
This threat is not worth the air or paper expended to issue it. It’s all standard operating procedure for a Jones on-air atrocity: say something; try and ride out the reaction; and when it becomes too much, and advertisers start departing, come out with an apology (sometimes involving an appearance on Q&A). Round and round it goes.
Let’s take a look at the threat itself. The statement was issued on Saturday but is not on the Macquarie Media website. And, importantly, there were a couple of names and one company missing from his threat: Nine Entertainment, its CEO Hugh Marks, and Nine chair and Liberal Party elder Peter Costello.
Why were their absences from the comments important? As every report has pointed out, Nine is trying to mop up the minorities in Macquarie Media in a $113 million takeover launched earlier this month. That will be wrapped up later this year after a couple of vocal minority fund manager shareholders (such as Geoff Wilson and Matthew Kidman) have forced a small increase out of Nine to lift the $1.36 cents a share to around $1.45 to $1.50 a share. Hugh Marks worked hard to make sure Alan Jones was re-signed finally to two more years in the 2GB breakfast shift — it was vital to the success of the takeover. In that deal, Marks had the support of the Nine board. If Jones had not re-signed, Jones might have gone elsewhere, slashing the value of the Nine stake in Macquarie by sending the shares plunging. It was a high stakes set of negotiations.
But none of those reports pointed out that when the bid is done there will soon be no need for a chair for Macquarie and a board; once the takeover is done, Jones can once again offend with impunity because his masters will be Hugh Marks and Peter Costello and the Nine board.
To make Saturday’s statement from Tate effective and credible, it should have been co-signed by Marks and Costello (especially given his Liberal Party roles over the years and Jones’ febrile support of the right wing of the Liberal Party).
News Corp papers and other outlets reported the threat straight-faced but there was no matching threat from the various papers that carry his print bleatings, nor was there any comment or threat from Sky News and its CEO, the former editor-in-chief of The Australian Paul “Boris” Whittaker.
The latter’s absence is not surprising seeing it was in February this year that former PM Malcolm Turnbull went all legal on Jones (and, through him, Sky) when Jones called Turnbull a traitor to the Liberal Party. Jones’ apology was grovelling and abject but there was no warning or apology from Sky News or Whittaker.
Clearly, Jones doesn’t have much to worry about unless Marks and Costello are knocking down his door.
I wrote this 12 years ago. Nothing has changed.
https://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=5750&page=0
There’s one very important thing….he’s 12 years older.
…and 12 years stupider.
Ah, here is the rub!
My husband tells me that I have the most sensitive BS detectors and I am also never wrong, when diagnosing dementia.
The Jacinda Ardern case of “backhanders and shoving socks down her neck” and other vile and other ancillary misogynistic remarks, some of which had to be heard, repeated, on media watch seals the diagnosis for me.
Yes, my BS meters were off the scale regarding the finger waving, Yah Yah.
It remains to be seen, how long Channel 9, want to be seen as equal opportunity employers, and how long before he costs more in court cases than he brings in.
Alan Jones would make a worthy target for egg boy. Just saying!
I remain puzzled by the constant reference to the sock but no alarm about the Caterwauling Catamite recommending the PM giver Ardern “.. a couple of backhanders”.
I didn’t know about the additional comments until today AR. The scaly old public toilet fiend has no time for strong women. His interests begin and end with his house boy. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
You really must be pushing for news. The article on Jones is old hat (archaic). How can one man be such a pain in your arse? If his listeners are as you say composed of 50% seniors “…holds a 19% share of the breakfast radio ratings, but almost half of that is made up by listeners older than 64…” why are you even acknowledging him?
Surely Crikey you can do better than waste serious space on a has beeeeeen? Or is there more to it? Your worried he may buy you out? A septuagenarian on the board – oh god what do we do? So he said that some lady should put a sock in it “‘shove a sock down throat'”. Not exactly an innovative use of words! And perhaps shows a lack of education? Or is it you for writing such an article?
It must be nice to speculate on what the Channel 9/ Fairfax conglomerate may do with such a person. However he remains a thorn in the lefts side and for that alone deserves to continue in the tone and tenor that he chooses – it is called free speech!
Interesting
With Jones, it all comes down to money – read ‘Jonestown” by Chris Masters. What we need to know is the list of businesses which have NOT ceased backing him.
Didn’t Freud have a theory about the source of male aggression toward powerful women?
I am suggesting that it just might be possible that her opinions might cut across the interests of (some) big businesses.
Lightweights rarely drown after having fallen through the shallow-ice of their thoughts.