After his National Press Club speech to mark the start of the political year yesterday, it’s clear that, at least for now, Scott Morrison has nothing to offer.
It looks like 2020 will be another year of doing nothing. There will be a pretense of action, and copious amounts of marketing spin, but Morrison, the most hollow prime minister in living memory, has nothing, at a moment when the country needs leadership more than at any stage in recent decades.
It’s also clear — to the extent that it might not have been from his stint at Tourism Australia — that Morrison isn’t a particularly good marketer. His speech made “where the bloody hell are you?” look like genius.
It’s clear the PMO is in dire need of a speechwriter, given his reliance on clichés, clunky language and the sort of sentences that can only emerge from an office spitball session:
“Australia is strong but we must become even stronger.”
“We live in a world of increasing global uncertainty.”
“We will counter the evil ideologies that underpin those terrorist attacks from whichever evil ideology it stems from.”
“Australians can be kept safer by an economy that is strong.”
Scotty from Marketing doesn’t even have a marketer’s ear for a glib phrase or musical language.
But clunkiness is fine if the content is there. But whether the aim of the speech was some sort of reset after a disastrous summer, or an attempt to provide reassurance that normal service was about to be restored, or simply because it’s now a tradition for leaders to speak at the Press Club in late January, the speech had so little content as to make you wonder why Morrison was bothering.
Australia faces three crucial policy challenges right now: climate change, integrity in politics, and a stagnant economy. Until late last year, the economy was the primary challenge, but that now looks relatively innocuous in the wake of a catastrophic summer and the vivid demonstration of political corruption given us by the sports rorts affair.
Readers may recall a time, many hours ago, when our finest political journalists spoke of Morrison “pivoting” on climate change.
Yesterday’s speech confirmed there never was a pivot, or even a mild lean: Morrison devoted a substantial part of his speech to the lies that Australia’s emissions abatement targets are sufficient, that they will be met and that he is undertaking “climate action”, a phrase uttered over and over, as if sheer repetition could make it true.
“Our climate action agenda is a practical one,” Morrison said, sounding uncannily like John Howard talking about “practical reconciliation” (in a world where “Orwellian” is grossly overused, the Newspeak-style abuse of “practical” to mean “something that has no meaningful impact” has long escaped notice).
Instead, Morrison will attempt to look busy with royal commissions to examine whether previous royal commissions’ recommendations have been implemented (something a bureaucrat in PM&C could surely do in a week) and fiddling with the rules around using the ADF in national emergencies.
Worse, Morrison argued that “climate action” could consist of measures that would actually worsen climate change. Allowing landowners to clear their properties and doing more hazard reduction is “the climate action we need now”.
More fossil fuels are needed, as well, apparently. Morrison talked at length about the need to tap more natural gas, about how “we need to get the gas from under our feet.”
Whether by coincidence or not, the share price of one of the Coalition’s biggest donors, gas company Santos — which also has extensive staff links to the Coalition — rose at the same time to an intra-day high.
Despite the dominance of sports rorts in the media cycle, Morrison didn’t even mention integrity in the speech, except to refer to his anti-union legislation. Evidently, the only integrity problem in Australian public life is among union officials.
As Nationals MP Darren Chester — by far the smartest, most competent and thoughtful member of his party, which is why he is languishing in the outer ministry — noted yesterday, “the greatest deficit we face right now in Australian politics has nothing to do with the budget, it’s a deficit in the trust between us and the public we represent”.
But it was a deficit Morrison thought not worthy of mention, not even to note the government’s laughable “National Integrity Commission” proposal.
In his answers to a flurry of questions about McKenzie from journalists in the post-speech Q&A, Morrison went further and dismissed any factual statements about McKenzie’s rorting as “editorial” by journalists. Presumably the Australian National Audit Office, too, is guilty of “editorialising” about the rorted program.
It was less of a surprise that Morrison, assuring us the economy was “strong” over and over, had nothing to offer on wage stagnation, persistent low economic growth, interest rates stuck near zero or the country’s productivity crisis.
The only surprise was his claim that retail sales indicated the strength of the economy — a perverse claim to make when six national retail chains have collapsed over the summer, following in the wake of over a dozen in 2019.
On three key issues facing Australia, Morrison’s message was “nothing to see here”. When it comes to national leadership, he’s dead right.
If God really was responsible for Scummo’s electoral success, then God must really hate Australians.
Choosing him shows how much they hate themselves. No self-respect at all!!!
Clearly the entire role of the Coalition nowadays is to mount delaying actions against any change that could impact the oligarchs who own them. Hollow parties, hollow MPs, hollow PM.
When/if Labor gets back into power it should immediately try to implement sweeping changes to political donations laws to stop this ever happening again – even if it impacts the ALP too. Democracy is dying because of vested interests.
Right you are Xoanon, but for the next election Labor should borrow from the LNP playbook and make the wonderful promises that Murdoch loves and that do not startle the horses, then once in power – start swingeing changes like Whitlam did, and put the national house in order no matter the initial outcry.
I totally agree, Australians do not generally engage enough in the detail of politics to be won over by cogent and/or complex policy- that’s not a criticism- people are busy in their lives. However, Labor has to start talking to people instead of wisecracking in poli- speak. And yes- avoiding complex policy-
Ah yes Fairmind but look what we did to Whitlam.
Too late to put “the national house in order “, its been well and truly trashed and vandalised by successive occupants.
If ever there was a time to embrace the saying “you don’t know what you have lost until its gone” its now!
The head Moron (there are so many in conservative ranks) will scour anything, have his cronies, minders, henchmen, ringkissers, all looking for useful propaganda, lies, methods, in the scribblings of Adolf, Benito, Francisco, Josef, any dictatorial imperious anus, as a guide to convincing someone that sugar is shit. Morrison to a giant like Curtin is as poodle poo to the Himalayas.
‘SmoCo’ continues to be the most apt moniker for a man full of smoke, who takes a tea break holiday during a crisis and who fails the country on climate issues. It also happily uses the letters of his own marketing moniker. Furthermore, whilst I agree with the three issues you identify, I believe a fourth is of equal standing and in immediate need of resolution in Australia- tax reform. So the country of high expectations can actually afford them in the years to come as the boomer tsunami crashes onto the shore (I’m one, by the way).
The people of Australia should understand that Smoko and family were far too busy bonding on the Hawaiian beach with some unidentified people (photos supplied to press) to be interrupted by the inconvenience of a bushfire catastrophe, which had started before Smoko demonstrated his responsibility level by failing to delegate when he sneaked out of Australia.
I was told that Smoko shrugged and said “Bush fires are normal and volunteer fire fighters are just doing what they like to do”.
My suspicion is that scottie from marketing doesn’t actually read things like the Garnaut Report or remember those pesky applications for a national air fleet of water bombers.
After all it was 3 years ago.
He certainly let them know their place in the scheme of things by siccing David Littleproud and Angus #gates Taylor on to them, didn’t he. The country boys called them all “has beens”.
Its a bit inconvenient that the ex-fire chiefs were right, as was the Garnaut Report.
Now about those sporting grants, at the moment we have a special on over here………….
Hoping a journalist will soon challenge the premise of Scotty from Marketing’s answers to questions.
For example – since when is ‘doing our bit’ to address a rapidly warming world enough. Given that Australia is currently demonstrating the true impact of global warming, Australia (as represented by the Commonwealth Government) should be amongst the leadership group on climate action – pushing for greater ambition.
Since Scotty from marketing refuses to actually answer any questions maybe it is time for journalists to try something different. How about not attending any of his press conferences – nothing to lose since he is incapable of coherent thought and is similarly unable not to lie. And maybe the opposition could boycott Question Time since it is way past being a time to get any real information. Don’t give him any publicity at all. Something has to change and it is clear the coalition is not going to change it seems to me that change will have to be instigated by non-members of this poisonous pack of idiots.
Or perhaps, the journalists at Morrison’s pressers, could ask each other questions such as; do you think the prime minister believes any of this garbage he’s banging on about?
A tactic being used in some places, I think the Netherlands is one, is that all the journalists in the press conference work together. If the Minister or PM evades A’s question B will repeat the same question, then C, then D until the question is answered.
This sounds like a static worth trying. Just nodding politely is not working – the spin just gets louder and more repetitive.
A new strategy is needed to hold our elected (struggling to say) leaders to account. They are currently so removed from reality they cannot see how pathetically they are being received.
An embarrassment of entitlement lacking in any talent or empathy currently stealing the future from our children.