Look, bragged first-time Insiders panelist (and The Australian’s national affairs editor) Simon Benson last weekend, here’s something to see: all four panel members are past or present News Corp journalists.
And with that, he briefly opened a window into News Corp culture and its attempts to shape Australia’s media landscape — and the ABC, in particular.
Twitter was quick to take Benson at his word: there have, after all, been a few new faces from the heart of the News Corp beast pop up on the ABC’s flagship political commentary program since David Speers was poached as presenter from Sky.
Was all this a sign of the ABC’s notorious pre-emptive buckle to right-wing pressure?
Probably not. In fact, it tells us a lot more about News Corps than it does the ABC.
The ABC has long had to manage News Corp, Goldilocks style, so it’s “just right”: not too cold and distant that it provokes News Corp to turn up to boiling its long-simmering war on the public broadcaster; not too hot and passionate that the ABC risks becoming a public face of News Corp values.
It requires equal part push-back and accommodation. Under a conservative government, it’s among the broadcaster’s unwritten KPIs. It’s easy to bend over backwards a touch too far, as the ABC did in the late Howard years when The Australian front page splashes set the broadcaster’s morning news agenda.
This makes the Murdochs’ company an annoyance for the ABC. But News Corp actually needs the ABC.
Most obviously, it needs an enemy. It needs to be able to point to the public broadcaster, while looking over its shoulder at its right wing base, to say: “See! See! This is why you need us.” Take Chris Kenny, assuring Sky listeners the day after that, notwithstanding Benson’s appearance, Insiders is “relentlessly anti-conservative” and “the panel is usually filled by green left journalists” and “small ‘L’ liberals”.
But now, as the COVID-19 shock has shattered the commercial business model, the ABC has become a commercial imperative. News Corp needs free media — the ABC — to promote its content to a broader audience as it sheds relevance and influence behind its hard paywalls.
At the same time, deep within itself, News Corp understands the ABC owns “trust”. It needs to grasp some reflection of that trust by having their voices on the ABC’s talk programs, in both radio and television.
In this context, Benson’s Insiders intervention can be understood more as an opportunistic News Corp promo, than a claimed culture wars win.
Look at the data. Insiders is 10 programs into the Speers era. It’s had 23 guest panellists: seven from various News Corp outlets plus two former News employees — The Sydney Morning Herald’s David Crowe and the ABC’s Patricia Karvelas both making their second appearance last Sunday. It’s had half a dozen new faces, three from News.
There’s a natural suspicion: the new iteration is still recent, still trying to find its feet. Speers is more directional than his long-term predecessor Barrie Cassidy. He’s still more interviewer than moderator with his co-panellists. He’s finding that politicians bring a more rigorous caution to the ABC than they may have to Sky where they would (often mistakenly) assume they were chatting with friends.
Cassidy also brought an often under-appreciated nuance of how government actually works from having been a governmental insider as a prime ministerial adviser. That depth now relies on panellists like former Costello adviser Nikki Savva.
But there’s an important insight in Benson’s intervention: it demonstrated News’ contradictory approach to former employees. Inside the corporate walls, they are freely denounced as traitors. Publicly, they’re claimed with pride as evidence that News Corp still shapes news.
While journalists are shaped by the culture of their employer, they rarely take much of that with them when they leave. It’s a continuing surprise how quickly a “News” person becomes, say, an “ABC” person.
With Speers, it was clear that Sky News left him behind in its lurch to the right long before he left Sky for the ABC. Worse for News Corp, his move suggests that, for all their bragging, it’s the ABC that’s the employer of choice for Australia’s journalists.
After Speers being employed by the ABC, who is next … Andrew Bolt?
Well, Blot was a long time occupant of the nutters’ armchair, along with Akerman & Gerard, whilst the sane(r) folk relaxed on the couch.
Akerman was exiled after his appalling traducing of PM Gillard’s paramour and Blot for his climate denialism – both long overdue.
I haven’t had a TV for a decade so the furniture may have changed a bit but, listening via NewsRadio, it seems not the kow-towing, if not outright obeisance, to the right wing hegemon.
Perhaps it is just a matter of getting accustomed to the different Speers’ style but at the moment, I am not as enamoured with Insiders as I was with Barry Cassidy. Speers’ blatant rudeness towards his interviewees is utterly appalling. He assumes, correctly, that all politicians lie and when they are not lying they are giving long winded non-answers, but he interrupts and repeats questions in his quest for the “gotcha” moment. It is disappointing and the little I had seen of Speers suggested to me he would be a great choice, but I had clearly not seen enough to see his true style. He might be a moderate by Sky standards, but he is, thus far, pretty atrocious as I see it.
I witnessed Benson and his nauseating pro-LNP, pro-Morrison piffle and was staggered that such a biased nitwit claque would be allowed near Insiders. A balanced range of viewpoints is one thing. Vomit-inducing sycophancy is quite another. Benson’s painfully obsequious suggestion that the talentless hack Morrison is one of Australia’s greatest PM’s would have been bewildering were it not such utter nonsense. Frankly, on last Sunday’s episode, even Karvelas veered rather too close to pretentious adulation of Scotty from Marketing for my liking. By any logical measure, he has done what was needed, but that alone doesn’t make him a great PM – adequate is a far better description, but let’s not forget his appalling performance across a range of political roles and as PM up to now.
Absolutely spot-on. This article is waffle, failing completely to get to grips with the unmitigated bias of last weekend’s panel. Not to mention Speers’ constantly attempting a ‘gotcha’ on Sally McManus, who had no trouble dealing with him. Karvelas is a very thinly disguised lightweight, grinning LNP apologist; Crowe is now a mundane hack commenter in the Age/SMH, and clearly leans right of centre; Benson is one of the worst writers in Murdoch’s cesspit and on the evidence orally inarticulate. The adulation of Morrison which you’ve mentioned was unforgivable, unacceptable and undeserved partisan spruiking from someone who’s supposed to be an analyst. That was probably the worst Insiders I’ve ever seen, and offered nothing of any depth, let alone impartiality.
I agree CW, I had to walk away after Benson’s ludicrous outburst. Spears’ interviews with Hunt and Cormann were equally appalling. I’m not sure I’ll watching it much longer.
I watch Insiders regularly. I thought that both Simon Benson and James Campbell, a new panellist the week before, added very little to the discussion – both are obviously not used to the format, though Campbell used to appear on SNAD until a blooper in January. (I learned that when I checked him out after the program – not being a News Corp reader I had no idea who he was.)
Although I disagreed with most of everything he said I preferred Gerard Henderson to both these newcomers. At least he is orally coherent, which neither Benson nor Campbell were.
Rosebutt’s ABC doing promos for Limited News – as if we wouldn’t know where to get their sort of opinion-as-news tabloid pap if we wanted?
Week before “Gotcha” Speers tried to organise a pile-on of Albanese – on the basis of what was “suggested to me by some in Labor” re the difference between the way he was acting like ann Opposition Leader while McManus was working so well with Morrison/Porter (Ergo :- “Why can’t Albanese be more pliable like McManus”?).
So :-
* How many (if not ‘who’) ‘in Labor’ had suggested that?
* It wasn’t just another Limited News “phantom” scoop?
Luckily Mark Kenny was there to point out the difference between politics and a union leader working government for workers under present circumstances.
Having Cormann on (who, as Kenny said is “the minister when you don’t want to give anything away”) – as if Speers was going to get any good oil out of that automaton?
This week he tried to wedge McManus and Albanese – and fell over when she wouldn’t play ball.
Rosebutt’s picked up “Spivsy” and is running the ABC into the tabloid gutter – soon no one will care if the ABC disappears – it will be no different to any other failing media company
Why would Limited News whine? They’ve inoculated Insiders with one of their own – it’s led to more of their own getting a go at peddling their politics – to advertise their political wares – what’s not to like?
* Viellaris (usually confined to doing Curry or Maul PR and press releases for Adani, coal, Canavan, Christensen, Dutton, Joyce, “Toad Buster” Hanson in particular and the Limited News Party in general – on twice this Speers era) in her “Scott”, “Bridget”, “very good Health Minister (Hunt)” objectivity.
* Bender Benson’s “Scott …. Scott Morrison is emerging as one of the most capable prime ministers this country has seen in a long time”.
* Savva is only having a go at her ‘favourite party’ in power because Morrison knifed Turnbull, who knifed Abbott (who, with Credlin, went so far on the smell of his oily rag than Savva’s “St Peter” was able to drag his guts to do)?
I’ve been an Insider watcher for many years, missing very few shows. In all that time I have never seen adulation bestowed on an Australian politician, Conservative or Labor, as Simon Benson did in his closing Insider remarks last Sunday. This even after Morrison demonstrated the usual traits of conservative politicians delivered in heaps during the early stages of the COVID crisis; procrastination followed by prevarication. It seems deliberate delays in isolating Australia from the virus for at least 2-3 weeks with an explanation; “we don’t want to rush things as Labor did with WFC” have already been forgotten. How much this deliberate attempt to try and demonstrate conservative measured control versus much needed urgency has cost Australia, we won’t know until the final inquest. Morrison even tried to imbue a sense of “she’ll be right’ calm into the situation. The last thing that was needed and similar to his actions in the early stages of the bushfires. Remember those? Other examples are the gay rights debates and of course, climate action.
My concern with the change we’re seeing in media commentary is, if you hold a reasoned, compassionate view supported by scientific or professional opinion and history, it’s labelled as coming from the Left instead of the intelligent, liberal thinking Middle.
Mr Shouty McSmirkface’s interminable pressers are bad enough but this morning it was a sermon which would have had the Hillsong masses snoring or puking.
Just watch Prof Brendan Murphy, he nods when Smoko makes the right point, he drops his head and sometimes flinches when Smoko is making things up as he has a brain wave.
When he follows “the mouth out” with his head down, he is disappointed with the speech.
It is very similar to watching Dr Fauci face palming as he stands behind Trump.