You can tell this is a war when the public turns on a billionaire for doing business with the “enemy”.
Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest’s notorious self- and China promotion finally went too far yesterday at a disastrous press conference in Melbourne.
His efforts to be seen as a saviour and peacemaker ended with him being reviled on social media as treasonous and a traitor, and accused of trying to hijack government foreign policy.
It was meant to be a grovelling PR exercise with Health Minister Greg Hunt thanking Forrest and his Minderoo Foundation for purchasing 10 million coronavirus testing kits from China for the Australian government.
But Forrest decided to invite his mate — Chinese consul-general for Victoria Long Zhou — to the event, and then to the podium for a good bit of propaganda on China’s handling of the coronavirus.
“An ambush” was how furious government insiders described his actions, given he did not bother to warn Hunt or the government, despite the fact that morning the papers were full of a bitter diplomatic row between Canberra and Beijing.
Pro-Twiggy sources went into damage control, claiming he was only trying to repair relations but that was undermined by the fact he had done exactly the same thing to his own WA government minister three weeks earlier.
On April 1, Forrest was at press conference with state Health Minister Robin Cook to thank him for securing medical supplies for WA, when he decided to bring along the state consul Dong Zhi Hua.
He didn’t learn his lesson after the backlash then, and this week’s repeat performance was even worse given Canberra and Beijing were at the height of a furious feud over Australia’s calls for an inquiry into China’s handling of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Indeed Forrest was in the AFR that very morning with a bizarre intervention calling for any inquiry to be held off until after the US election.
The man who made $6 billion off the back of selling Australian iron ore to China has always been our most vocal business supporter of Beijing. He has also been increasingly using his charitable funds to make political points.
His Minderoo Foundation has donated some $270 million since it was established in 2001, but has recently been acting more like another arm of government.
The much-hyped 10 million COVID-19 testing kits, and the earlier $160 million in medical supplies to WA, are not actually being “donated” by the foundation but in fact will eventually be paid for by the taxpayers — at cost, as Forrest has indicated. The governments had outsourced theses crucial task to Forrest given his close ties to China.
There was his intervention in the bushfire crisis in January, where he didn’t just donate money to existing causes like his fellow citizens, and his $70 million came with some interesting caveats.
Ten million dollars was to be spent on setting up his own volunteer “army” of first responders to be deployed around the country. The bulk of the funds, some $50 million, was to be spent on a “national blueprint for fire and disaster resilience”.
Who needs a government white paper on crucial national issues — in fact, who needs a government at all — when Twiggy’s self-funded army is coming to the rescue?
Politicians do love standing by Twiggy as he announces his donations. In 2017, then-PM Turnbull was there for the glitzy announcement in Parliament House that the Forrests were donating $400 million to charity. There were real celebrities too including Russell Crowe and Jack Thompson.
Kevin Rudd was there for not one but two of the Forrests’ altruistic endeavours, including the Australian Employment Covenant, launched with much fanfare in 2008 with the aim to provide 50,000 jobs for indigenous workers.
A later version saw corporate mates like James Packer “pledge” jobs, but there has been criticism over the years of just how few tangible jobs ever eventuated.
An even bigger coup was signing up Pope Francis, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the grand Iman of Egypt to launch his global freedom network to end modern slavery. That launch in 2014 was at the Vatican, but no one was ambushed by Chinese officials that time apparently.
We all know it is uncharitable to criticise rich donors who have an undue influence on government. Australia has a long history of turning controversial business figures into “philanthropists”.
But then you can end up like Clive Palmer, whose efforts to help out during the coronavirus crisis by purchasing 30 million doses of malaria drugs just gets you ridiculed.
Then again, he’s not being accused of being a China stooge.
And let’s not forget that Scott Morrison appointed former Fortescue chief and Forrest confidante Nev Power to oversee the powerful National COVID-19 Coordination Commission to bring the economy back from the crisis.
The PM might want to recall the fate of his predecessor Kevin Rudd, who was brought down by the very mining tax which Forrest so virulently opposed.
But to be fair if Forrest had to pay more tax there would have been less for him to donate back to the taxpayers.
Thanks for your article. I found it curious that hardly anything at all was mentioned in the media about his recent (three weeks ago) interim dividend payment of $700m, or thereabouts. Though plenty was reported about him donating to charity $540m the following week. The thing is, it was donated to his own charity, Minderoo – tax dodge??. It’s hard not to feel skeptical about Forrest. He is notoriously miserly in person and everything he does seems to have an agenda.
Bloody hell. Just how much does it cost to buy an “Australian of the Year” award?
Excellent journalism, Janine Perrett. Your piece serves as an example to other Crikey journalists about how to write an interesting and informative piece just sticking to the reporting of facts without a heavy overlay of personal values that Rundle and Keane, for example, can’t seem to leave out.
Agree, wholeheartedly.
A fine job and an example to emulate.
Like Stephen Mayne, get the facts, present them clearly.
I can’t help feeling that both the US and China are pressuring us to take sides in their dispute.
I saw from the New Scientist (a credible and relatively apolitical journal) an article that clearly showed that there is sensible scientific information now available about the origins of coronavirus. Dr Bruce Alyward a WHO pandemic specialist appeared on the ABC after returning from Wuhan to debrief with Oz specialists, was frank and open about the Chinese response to the virus. There seems to be little that the WHO doesn’t now know about COVID 19 and its origins.
I am guessing that the US is pressuring us to annoy the Chinese with a probably unnecessary review, just as the Chinese are using every lever they have to influence our government to call off their requests. As your article points out, the billionaires have a vested interested, just as (especially with today’s announcement from Trump about how China wants him to lose the presidency) Morrison needs to be seen to kowtow to the US too. In truth the WHO hasn’t done a bad job, they are just another Trump excuse for his appalling national COVID 19 performance.
As Hugh White suggests, our response to China should never be the US’s kneejerk. We need a more independent, thoughtful, longterm and wise strategy to manage our relationship with China, which looks beyond Xi JIngping’s ugly rhetoric. Above all we need real strong local statesmanship.
Something above Morrison’s paygrade I fear. Not that that many of his predecessors would be much better.
Why is it that we get more Brutus’ than Caesars?
Rhupert, can you explain to me how calling for an enquiry into the origins of Corvid-19 must be the result of the “US pressuring us to annoy the Chinese”? Isn’t finding out how it started a worthwhile exercise for all humanity?
Bill, thanks for your question.
There is no shortage of evidence about how it started from the WHO and others. See this New Scientist article: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24532764-000-the-hunt-for-patient-zero-where-did-the-coronavirus-outbreak-start/
and
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-18/controlling-covid-19-in-australia-with-dr-bruce-aylward/12066238?nw=0
The WHO despite its shortage of funding and odd missteps has done a good job. Trump is demonising them to get himself off the hook and play to US prejudices about the UN.
As usual we are all the way with the US, who have no ability or interest in our continuing protection.
Do you think that the US would go along with this kind of request? No sovereign nation with any status would.
I’m not so sure the WHO has done a great job at all. They were very slow out of the blocks on Covid-19. They were slow to call it a Pandemic – 2 weeks after Australia did, they also criticised Australia for stopping flights to/from China. The supported the reopening of wetmarkets, without knowing where this pandemic originated. WHO has made serious missteps throughout this. An independent inquiry, including independent of the WHO, is reasonable.
Yes to most of your comments, but
Ceasar was dictator for life, you want more Ceasars?
It’s really odious to see the likes of Forrest, Gina, Palmer etc, who have all made their billions or millions selling OUR resources, strutting around big noting themselves.
Fundamentally, they’re just ticket clippers. Sure, they may have had to build some infrastructure to extract and ship the minerals, but as the Adani case in Queensland is showing, you can be sure either the State or Federal government has actually paid for that too.
We, as a country, are paying these individuals to do bugger all. Nice work if you can get it.
Ah bjb, it could have been so different though!
Due to the bloody minded obstruction of the predecessors of this LNP rabble running the country.
Under the Whitlam Labor government we could have had the Petroleum and Minerals Authority up and running like Norway’s Statoil.
In our case the the Commonwealth would have the power to find OUR minerals and petroleum, mine / drill, process and then market them , instead of handing over all the profitable processing stages to foreign interests. Foreign interests would have been invited to join and provide expertise in developing a project, but the Commonwealth would call the shots, now of course the boot is on the other foot.
At least Norway puts the proceeds from its oil wealth into a sovereign wealth fund for a rainy day, not us. How we could use that buffer now in coping with Covid- 19, without for example, allowing those who can least afford it to dip into their superannuation?
At least Kevin & Julia tried with their half baked versions of MRRT (Minerals Resource Rent Tax). Too late now to shut the gate, all the horses have well and truly bolted!
I dare say Twiggy, Gina, Clive, Mr Adani & Co. can do as they please so long as they keep both parties on the electoral funding “drip feed”?