The faceless men and women are back. During a week when several senior Liberal MPs have covered themselves in odour, it is, apparently, Labor leader Anthony Albanese whose job is at risk.
At least, it is according to unnamed party figures quoted in News Corp’s national broadsheet, The Australian.
The narrative of Albanese in freefall kicked off in the aftermath of Joe Biden’s victory, and gained serious momentum last Tuesday, when member for coal and right factional leader Joel Fitzgibbon quit the front bench.
Then, overnight, Albanese’s deputy chief of staff Sabina Husic resigned, after an online dossier attacking her character did the rounds, indicating that something indeed is amiss in the leader’s office.
And these flashpoints have been accompanied by the all-familiar rumblings about leadership instability. Anonymous sources are forward-sizzling snippets of Albanese’s political obituary to gleeful News Corp scribes.
Nameless Labor figures continue to express their disappointment with the state of things in The Australian. And slowly, the outline of a target has begun to emerge on the opposition leader’s back.
Biden victory and Fitz fallout
Biden’s election win, a rare recent success for a progressive in the West, gave Labor a bit of a jolt. After congratulating the president-elect, Albanese appeared to urge Scott Morrison to get on the blower and push Donald Trump to concede.
The Australian wrote that Albanese “was privately ridiculed in Labor ranks” for the suggestion. It was, according to political editor Denis “the curve” Shanahan, “just nuts”.
The fallout from the US election, which marks the end of an administration firmly wedded to climate denialism, helped spur on Albanese’s next big headache: Joel Fitzgibbon. Ever since Labor’s shock loss last May, when Fitzgibbon’s formerly safe seat of Hunter turned marginal, the now-backbencher has been freelancing on climate policy, arguing the party’s ambitious emissions targets were the key reason for that defeat.
Fitzgibbon the hero
After months of bitching to the media, Fitzgibbon quit after a caucus shouting match brought on by left MPs using Biden’s success to talk about climate change. Fitzgibbon’s departure sent the hot takes about Albanese’s demise into overdrive, and gave the Oz a new hero.
Within hours, the paper was arguing that the blowup “set the scene for a leadership challenge”, with Fitzgibbon the most likely alternative. Labor right figures (and lord knows who!) told national affairs editor Simon Benson the situation may be “terminal”. Fitzgibbon, Benson argued, had “broad appeal”, and could pose a threat to the Morrison government.
Over on Murdoch’s Sky News, Andrew Clennell said Fitzgibbon was “stoking the fires of leadership speculation”, and in an interview, discussed the “angst” brewing within caucus. Even Albanese’s decision to replace Fitzgibbon with Ed Husic on the front bench was a disaster, Benson claimed, as the western Sydney MP’s support for a live exports ban would surely be a disaster in the bush.
By the start of this week, the Oz’s Troy Bramston had declared Albanese’s leadership on death watch, because, apparently, most MPs were certain he would be dumped before the election or lead them to another defeat.
The Husic affair
Late on Monday, an anonymous dossier, alleging a culture of bullying in the leader’s office began circulating among journalists andstaffers. The Nine newspapers were first to jump on that, reporting yesterday about the dossier’s existence, and later adding Albanese’s insistence it was fake.
By this morning, Sabina Husic had resigned, calling out the “malicious, false, fake and defamatory” attacks made against her in the dossier. Husic, a well-regarded staffer, is the sister of Ed Husic, who took over the resources portfolio after Fitzgibbon quit.
The Daily Telegraph today reports Albanese’s claim that the allegations made about his office were false. Also today, the Oz has used Sabina Husic’s resignation to talk about division in Albanese’s office and how they were “now dividing and distracting every tier of the federal opposition”.
Should Albo care about all this? Just ask Kevin and Malcolm.
Another reason for an enquiry into the political interference by Murdoch and the collusion with the Liberal Party. It sounds like the dirty deeds of the US Republican Party colluding with the same media mogul. I find these personal assaults especially from such a grubby government disgusting
If only politicians would cease reading The Australian & other News Corp offerings, democracy might have a fighting chance. MPs are easily rattled to react, the voters not so much.
Imagine :- “Handmaiden Rupert holding up a mirror …. to a quorum of Narcissuses …..”
Let’s face it they had to move the electorate’s focus from Porter, Tudge, Cash, another bad report for the M-DBA, Robodebt, Liberal governed SA’s Covid outbreak, ‘green’ Biden winning PotUs, the reality of a “gas (b)led recovery”, Shredderjiklian’s ministrations…..?
…. “In Case of Fires, Break the Labor Leadership Glass.”
“… a week when several senior Liberal MPs have covered themselves in odour…”
ordure ôr′jər►
n. Excrement; dung.
n. Something morally offensive; filth.
Dang Crikey spellcheck!
Or is it? Dung, Crikey – Spellcheck!
I doubt that it is the fault of SpellCheck.
Rather it is the tendency of a $2 writer trying to use a $5 word to appear clever.
Similarly, the sure sign of a hack is one who uses cliches, without the remotest understanding of their provenance or meaning, to appear competent.
I could not be happier if the Labor Party woke up to the fact that they’ve struck a dud with Albanese but to suggest a reactionary fossil like Fitzgibbon is leadership material is beyond funny. The sooner they replace Anthony with Jim Chalmers the more likely they are to win the next election. Jim has the advantage of being able to communicate clearly and concisely plus he’s from Queensland and did his PhD on Paul Keating. C’mon people, what’s not to like.
If Fitzgibbon deserves consideration as Labor leadership material, why not give Mark Latham another chance?
Why not seek to recruit all of O. N?
All over reaction.
This is what Murdoch et al count on.
No, stay the course; maintain the rage, or whatever keeps your feet facing the fire.
Morrison and his lot are the ‘light weights’ but you seem to want to go to the same marketing as a ‘key selection criteria’ he and his lot demonstrate. Jim Chalmers is a nice bloke and certainly has more to offer than that but it is not yet his ‘time’.
His ‘time’ was the neolib mania last century. .
He has nothing to offer the future, a true Thatcher child.
That he makes the original Feral Abacus seem human?
Charmless couldn’t be less suited to the Labor party if he had a Hayek tattoo on his forehead.
I have no idea as to what you have in mind (it can’t be a Rex Connor clone) but suffice to observe that Fraser, except for reassuring the yanks, didn’t change a damned thing. A recession and chrisima head-butted him and Dawkins (et al) became the new order of things.
Chalmers is located in that (user pays – with conditions) camp. With Fitzyg contemplating representation as an Independent what remains IS the (real) ALP and Chalmers is representative (much less so that is Shorten).
From another perspective, regarding the conduct of the House, just how different are the two groups from 2016?
The foulmouthed bovver PJK called Hewson a Feral Abacus.
A search for “insults Paul Keeting” is worth the trouble and hardly an example of grace.