With the speed of the news cycle being what it is, the temptation is to move on quickly, lest one appear to be behind the curve. That urge needs to be absolutely resisted in the case of the US Capitol invasion.
This is such a strange and significant event that its full import is difficult to assimilate. As with any moment in which capital-H History actually makes an appearance amid the trivia and detritus of history, the tendency is to shuffle the event into pre-existing categories and move on.
But that simply can’t be done with the Capitol invasion. As the truth of this event, or multiplicity of such becomes more visible, it is clear that its initial appearance disguised its real character.
What appeared to be an expression of the dark, carnivalesque character of the American right — their co-option and continuation of the ’60s yippie style politics — was only one side of the picture, and essentially acted as cover.
There was plenty of that to go around, such as the so-called “Q Shaman”, of the horns and fur and face paint, a would-be actor who lives in his mom’s basement.
Yet after a few days of these features, it became clear that the core of the event had been quite different, not a wander through the marble halls of power made possible by state incompetence and complicity, but a desperate struggle in several places that constituted a raw challenge to the US state, and which could have ended in multiple assassinations and many deaths.
As it turns out, the Capitol invasion was not only openly planned and discussed online, it was accompanied by half a dozen attacks and would-be occupations of capitol buildings in state capitols across the country.
This is a model that the disparate forces of MAGA, QAnon, etc, could easily scale up for the inauguration. But of course the movement has missed its great strategic opportunity, for the complacency of law and order has gone — and the movement’s explicit sympathisers within the state will be keeping vewwy quiet.
The inauguration and its satellite events — once an important part of the American mystique, of a nation favoured by God — will now be ringed by thousands of troops, many of them currently bivouacking in the marble halls of DC.
That is an achievement for the MAGA crowd– to make power visible — but not for that section of the mob, who had talked of assassinations and executions of Congress members as part of the great “storm” that was coming.
Rather than ask how they got so close to doing this, it’s worth asking why they did not. Here was a crowd with a firm idea of the illegitimacy of their government, with an opportunity to ramp up tension to a crisis point, which might draw out a million or so militia as people chose sides.
In that, they had a symmetry with external US state enemies, Al-Qaeda in particular. Yet at some point, they were constrained not by morals but by a lack of will, a lack of the real. Yet such a single atrocity would have absolutely achieved what they sought.
Like the agitated, goaded Boston Massacre of 1770, Sinn Fein’s shambolic takeover of Dublin’s Four Courts in 1916, or Black September’s destruction of passenger jets in the Jordan desert a half-century ago, the rhetoric of the act would have echoed vastly, made much happen.
The Capitol mob had it within their grasp, the cracking open of elite power that they sought. What stopped them? Surely, it wasn’t some sudden realisation of what it is to kill in cold blood. They never got that close to the actual situation. The cable ties remained unused, the guns stayed holstered.
Revolutions are made when the determination of insurgency meets a fatal lack of confidence in the ruling powers. The Capitol mob had their one shot last week and they threw it away.
Bizzarely, the Capitol mob got as close to creating an upheaval in metropolitan western power as did the urban uprising of Paris, May 1968. Despite their very different politics, there is commonality between the mob and the ’68ers, in their revolution against reality — or reality as defined by the regime in place.
‘Demand the impossible’ and ‘under the streets, the beach’ had the same demand on reality as does, in a congealed and deadened form, the Q conspiracy and the MAGA notion.
The latter demands something — a return of US total dominance and ever-expanding prosperity/consumerism, the glorious, glutinous bacchanal from the ’50s onwards — that the world daily tells Americans is now impossible.
There is no great strutting adventure left for the country as a whole, only managing a low growth western economy in a multipolar world.
The adventure is with blacks, Latinx, women, LGBTIQ, all those fighting for the next stage of a half-century of liberation. MAGA is powered by deep envy, a hunger for the meaning that movements like Black Lives Matter provides.
BLM’s programme looks ambitious; compared to the MAGA crowd, it is modesty itself. Like the radical Anabaptists of 16th century Munster, or the Red Guards of 1967 Shanghai, the MAGA crowd are storming heaven, storming reality.
They are fools and clowns manipulated by noxious (and more tech-savvy) racists, but it would be a mistake to miss the vaulting ambition that is present. If this were just about race, MAGA and Q would not have grown as it has. What many are noticing, cannot help but notice, is how this is growing.
Everything from vaxx-scepticism to paedo hysteria is breaking the banks of its hitherto narrow channels. Your cousin is suddenly a COVID-sceptic; you buy The Age at a country servo and the bloke running it starts raving about “fake news”.
This strikes me as a phenomenon far beyond the old mass media effects, the Murdoch effect, argued for by our heavy guns on Tuesday.
Trump’s rise, MAGA’s rise, was something else entirely, and the Murdoch org only attached themselves to such, when Trump’s great right-wing rolling thunder revue was clearly on a path to victory.
Suggesting this as a product of a Murdoch propaganda model is to believe that there is some sort of rationality at the centre of social life, which is to everyone’s benefit. Which is the sort of thing elites tend to believe.
Like it or not, Trump, Q, MAGA and whatever comes next are mass movements, born of the great fix we’re in. Irrationality thus becomes a rational weapon against a rationality that leaves you evermore, every year, like a rat in a cage.
Live the myth and it sweeps you up the steps of Congress, to have your rulers cowering in their officers. Did this crazed putsch-happening falter because there was nothing real it could possibly demand, or because it has not yet found its full political form?
As the great experiment of the United States approaches its 45th hand over of power in a city of marble, behind a ring of steel, we are about to find out.
You know, one of the aspects of the Capitol riot, that I don’t think has really been commented on, is that it was another conclusive demonstration of Trump’s stupidity. I mean, what did he think he was going to achieve!?? Did he think a rampaging mob would make people think, ‘well, you do seem to have plenty of support, perhaps you did win the election after all’? Or did he think that the mob would hold the legislature hostage long enough, for him to get in touch with anyone sympathetic in the military, and organise a proper coup? Or was it all just a massive toddler-style tantrum?
Either way, each option demonstrates an intellectual level, far below that required to lead a nation. And I think that’s the main reason why the mob attack didn’t really amount to much: it’s leader was an idiot, who didn’t really think things through.
I don’t know if Trump had anything that could be called a plan, but it is possible he hoped that launching an assault on the Capitol would give him the opportunity to declare an emergency, martial law, whatever – and so stop the transition to the next president.
The assault was chaotic and badly planned, but the mob came close to seizing many representatives who could then be held as hostages or killed. This was planned by a significant number of them. Trump nearly got his chance.
Yes, but the basic flaw in that plan, is that it required calmer heads, to give him more power, in order to protect the country from his followers.
Trump’s true nature was known to many before the 2016 election. His ghost writer on “The Art of the Deal gave a speech at the Oxford Union in 2016 and then had a Q&A session – have a look at this clip
Back in 2016 when Tony Schwartz predicted exactly what Trump would do when he lost the election. – YouTube
Interesting clip. And his psychologist niece, Mary Trump, has been saying much the same thing, over the past few years. Which is essentially, that he’s such a raving narcissist, that he only really accepts information that conforms to his vastly inflated opinion of himself (which definitely fits into my definition of stupidity).
It was step one of a complicated five-step plan. A plan that had been plotted for weeks in the open (on channels that the nice folk don’t follow). Read Twitter’s published explanation of why they ultimately yanked the Donald’s account. Read the several articles on the Intercept about it. Understand why there are 10000 heavily armed national guards in place for tomorrow…
I do think (and hope) that Guy is right though, and that they’ve flubbed it.
I think Trump is just a wrecker- “if I can’t have it, no one can”- the brother who breaks your new toy-
Great writing. For me, one of the main drivers of this is neoliberal economics – the way it’s restructured so many lives and made them deeply insecure. People are reacting in a deeply emotional way to the insecurity that’s been visited on them. If only centre-left politics could provide a rallying cry equal to that of the irrational right – but of course it’s deeply compromised by its long cooperation with the corporate powers-that-be.
I think you’re looking too narrowly at Murdoch’s influence. Trump and his ‘-ism’ come from decades of Republican mendacity (Southern strategy onwards) with Rupert’s backing once he realised how much money it could make him.
If you spend decades sowing fear, uncertainty and doubt about the underpinnings of civil society, sooner or later the foundations will start to give way.
Exactly, a culmination of GOP and its reps supporting or at least paying lip service to white nationalists, Confederates, Southern Strategy etc. who have been encouraged for two generations… after New Deal and rights.
This is in tandem with radical right libertarian ideology; before the demographic ‘tipping point’ is reached confirming (in their minds) the threat of the ‘great replacement theory’ (couched in eugenics)…..
Now we’re getting somewhere. The driving impulse to all this ‘irrationality’ is the instinctual collective species gut-rage-and-fear that tells us all: unless we stop what we are doing, and do something fundamentally different, and right now…then climate change is going to kill us all. Our house is burning, and deep down we all know it, but those powerful enough to put it out, still, just (maybe)…simply will not listen, and will not try. So of course the powerless will increasingly lash out ‘irrationally’. Our survival instinct is kicking in.
‘Irrational’? Oh boy, the powerful ain’t seen nuthin’ yet.
Yes, the ghastly irony of our species’ social behaviour is that in circumstances where the need for a rational collective response to a big threat – climate change – and its many consequences has never been greater, the actual responses in many countries are rapidly becoming more unhinged and destructive.
There’s been plenty said about how bad 2020 was but perhaps we should cheer up about it. Soon we’ll hardly believe things used to be this good.
Absolutely, frighteningly correct. It’s entirely conceivable that permafrost melting and the release of methane is already triggering an uptick and acceleration in the warming profile that makes CC reversal impossible. One we won’t even measure until far too late.
I am pretty pessimistic. I think that within a few years 2020 is going to look like the innocent ‘good old days’. ie Before we properly recognised what is ahead for most of us. Hope I’m wrong.
Alas, you are correct.
All the bien pensant talk of keep-kups and recycling is simple displacement gesture.
If all ignition of everything – yay! salads au go-go – tomorrow or last week/month/year the thawing of permafrost in Siberia & Canada is a constant, unstoppable and growing exponentially (not arithmetically, hi Razzy!) in magnitude for the next century or three.
That means dealing with the consequences, adapting where we can and abandoning when we must.
Pretty it will not be but the times are guaranteed to be interesting.
I’d say linearly, not arithmetically.
Arithmetic progressions are linear M. Such a progression takes the form:
A = a + (n – 1)d where ‘a’ is the 1st term and ‘d’ is known as the common difference which may be positive or negative. n is the nth term. Thus, 10, 7, 4, 1, – 2 is an arithmetic sequence
One thing the insurrectionists with their playful ‘this is all a joke to us’ attitude didn’t see coming is how seriously they will now be tracked down and punished by a frighted administration. And in that punishment will be sown the seeds of the next movement.
Gotta luv CCTV for forensic purposes but widely published selfies?
The Capitol fiasco is what happens when the ‘look at me!’ types are granted their wish.
If there was a perfect symbol of their revolutionary nature it is their filing into the interior of the Dome between the velvet ropes.
This is what happens after several generations raised on corn syrup – comparable to Roman upper classes losing IQ points with every slurp of lead sweetened wine with their kids drinking the water coming through the lead lined wooden pipes.
The velvet ropes were one symbol – there were different events elsewhere:
“All the while, the mob was chanting “U.S.A.” over and over and over again.
“We got one! We got one!” Fanone said he heard rioters shout. “Kill him with his own gun!” (Today’s WP).
The crowd in the Rotunda were guided by velvet ropes: easily led, no leader.