In a rare foray into foreign policy, Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese has hit out at Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s “affinity with Donald Trump” and his handling of the United States alliance.
“There is no doubt Mr Morrison put this affinity and his political interests first when he effectively went on a campaign rally stage with Donald Trump in Ohio,” Albanese said at Perth USAsia Centre this morning.
Amid shots at Morrison’s indulgence of the Coalition’s more Trumpian impulses, Albanese outlined Labor’s vision for the future of the US alliance during a difficult time.
There’s some clear opportunism in his timing. Ever since Morrison ummed and aahed about Trump’s encouragement of the Capitol insurrection, Labor has attacked the Coalition’s closeness to the president. This morning its foreign affairs spokeswoman Penny Wong did the media rounds to reiterate Albo’s line about Morrison’s Trump problem.
And on the eve of Joe Biden’s inauguration as US president, Albanese is sending a signal of Labor’s willingness to diverge from the bipartisan consensus that normally surrounds Australian foreign policy.
The key takeaways
Morrison, Albanese says, got far too cosy with Trump. Now, as the world turns against the soon-to-be-former president, Morrison still refuses to disavow him because his support base is too tied up in the party’s hard right loony fringe.
“He remains afraid of the far-right extremist fringe dwellers who make up the bedrock of his personal support — and who he cultivates through the avatars of Trumpists and conspiracy theorists like Craig Kelly and George Christensen,” he said.
He also criticised Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne, describing her as “absent” and creating a vacuum filled by people like Christensen, China hawk Andrew Hastie, and coal fetishist Matt Canavan.
So what would Labor do differently?
Albanese calls for Australia to take a more active role in managing the US alliance — beyond “a series of photo opportunities”. That would involve more leadership in the Indo-Pacific, greater action on climate change, and a role tackling emerging challenges like artificial intelligence and cyber security.
And if anyone in the incoming Biden administration is listening, Albanese calls on the new president to rejoin the Comprehensive Trans-Pacific Partnership, and indicates a desire for the US to reverse the isolationist trends of the Trump administration and return to international leadership and multilateralism.
On China, too, there are signs of difference with Morrison. Over the past 12 months, the Morrison government’s line has often been uncompromising — and at times ill-disciplined hawkishness — culminating in a trade dispute and a deterioration of the bilateral relationship.
Albanese opened the China segment with a softener, praising the country’s “remarkable achievement” in lifting millions out of poverty since 1978. He later acknowledges its increasingly assertive turn under Xi Jinping as a critical challenge, and calls on the Biden administration to put “clearer definition” in its competition with China.
Under Trump, an America first strategy that appeared to abandon regional allies in the Asia-Pacific, followed by a dialling up of anti-China rhetoric in the year before the 2020 election, was a sign of the administration’s confused and impulsive approach to Xi. No more please, Albanese says.
Beyond bipartisanship
Foreign policy in Australia traditionally remains fairly bipartisan. Foreign affairs rarely win elections, and there’s broad consensus around Australia’s place in the world as guided by a strong alliance with the US.
Bill Shorten, an outspoken critic of Trump, went to last year’s election promising an “independent, confident and ambitious” foreign policy while in substance offering little meaningful difference from the Morrison and Turnbull doctrines.
Still, although both parties put great value in the US alliance, Labor’s approach has always been a little more complicated, pulled by a traditional left-wing suspicion of American imperialism towards behaving as what Australian National University historian Frank Bongiorno calls “a friendly critic”.
But that bipartisanship is being stress-tested by two forces of geopolitical instability: a rock-bottom relationship with Xi’s assertive China, and the unpredictability of Trump.
In that context, Albanese’s sharp criticism of Morrison isn’t without precedent. Labor opposed Australia’s involvement in Iraq and Vietnam, and took issue with conservative governments during parts of the World Wars I and II.
During times of global instability, bipartisanship crumbles, Bongiorno says.
“The grave issues with the US during the Trump presidency, the rise of China, all of these are the kinds of pressing issues you get during major shifts in the global balance of power, which make foreign policy more subject to contention,” he said.
Please let this be the start of a resurgent opposition in Oz…it’s quite an eye-opener, how the absence of a meaningful opposition can turn an entire population into supine puppy dogs….Scomo has had the run of the joint, well and truly. And a large section of the country just keeps on letting it all go thru to the keeper. Fair dinkum, Netherlands has a government resign in shame over their “Robo-debt Lite”, Scomo’s mob just ploughs on without batting an eye, because they are never being called to account. And the hubris just grows bigger and bigger. Time to start fighting back, please. Like the saying “Build it and they will come”, i think you can also say “Start speaking up, and the support will come”.
Well said. Here’s hoping.
Amen!!
I asked a Dutch friend why the whole cabinet felt they had to resign following what appeared to me to be similar to a Robo-debt scandal. He said the ministers involved were being sued by individuals (hello Stuart Robert!) and that blame was being flung on all sides.
Why is no blame being apportioned in this case? Why are ministers being promoted (Tudge) instead of sued? I suspect Murdoch’s influence has a lot to do with it.
Members of our own government should also be personally liable for their actions – especially when introducing or extending vicious processes against the advice given to them.
The link between Morrison and Trump is provided by Murdoch who is the primary media force behind both.. the scandal is the sixty million dollars handed to Murdoch by the Morrison regime
Keep it up, Albo.
Scott Morrison should not get away with his tacit approval of Trump’s behaviour. Trump has demeaned the position of president and incited violence against his own country’s elected politicians – how low can a leader get?
A pleasing shift from Albo, but he needs to go a whole lot harder.
So many fronts where Labor needs to take a strong stance and forget bipartisanship with a rogue government….Climate change, Biodiversity, Science, care for the elderly, Inequality, Assange, Witness K, ICAC, and so many more….go on Albo and team, have a hard go and show us what you stand for.
PM today said that our most important relationship is that with America. But surely not? If so, how sad. Hanging on to the coattails of the world’s most unpopular nation.
He would say that. Didn’t he just get a little tin badge as reward for his sycophantic approach to American policy ?
Albo has hit the nail on the head, he has found a chink in Morrison and he has opened up about how far to the right this L/NP is.
Is a dangerous precedent when you allow things to go to far to one side as you lose the option of objective judgement as this Governent has done.
If you want to chase just how far to the right it is all you need do is look at the values it holds onto.
Morrison along with Johnson and Trump are all aligned to organisarions like QANON along with all other far right entitities that are abhorrent and radical.
Albo might have found that being insipid is not a strong point, he needs go on attack, undermine everything related to the dirry corrupt practices of the L/NP,
He has to get his message across, Muckracker media will not help him to push his agenda as it has already lost it’s one trick pony in Trump!
Hopefully enough ammunition to cut through in next campaign, and especially well before to prepare the electorate, like the LNP do.
The LNP has the advantage of favourable media treatment, with promotion by NewsCorp, Seven and 9Fairfax and often permanent election campaigns with dog whistling and nudging on issues, so the electorate is softened up by the time of any campaign; then they need only hit the right triggers.