As Victoria plunged into lockdown again last week attention fell on its embattled hotel quarantine system. This time it was the use of a nebuliser by an asthmatic guest which allegedly caused an outbreak.
But that rabbit warren of blame (including whether the federal government should handle hotel quarantine) obfuscated the true failings of Victoria’s administration.
It is the government’s lack of confidence in tracing a relatively small number of infections (Victoria has only 25 active cases of COVID) which led a cabinet, deeply paranoid of a third wave, to impose a minimum five-day mid-summer lockdown.
That it doesn’t trust its team of more than 2000 contact tracers to handle an outbreak initially involving a dozen or so people is deeply concerning, but not surprising.
It is an open secret that Victoria’s check-in process is often ignored and haphazardly enforced by businesses. I am very rarely asked to check-in at restaurants and am often interrupted during the cumbersome process by employees.
Additionally, Victoria seems far slower than other states at contacting even known contacts. A colleague who had the unfortunate luck of passing through the Melbourne Airport exposure site was contacted by Tasmanian and NSW authorities almost eight hours before their counterparts in Victoria.
The process could be easily fixed but Victoria’s health authorities lack any understanding of customer experience. For a start, removing friction by mandating that businesses adopt a unified tracing system is essential (with contact details saved and requiring only a single tap). Currently there are multiple systems being used, with customers often forced to spend several minutes re-inputting personal information. This discourages compliance and is highly prone to error.
But the myriad clunky systems are only half the problem. They don’t prevent people from not checking in at all or entering false details (only partially alleviated by cross-checking credit card information).
This is solvable though “double opt-in”: after you check in at a venue, you receive an automated SMS with a name confirmation and a unique code. Businesses should then be required to record the code and sight identification before providing service. Businesses who cannot verify customer data should be very heavily fined.
There is a perverse incentive for customers to not accurately check in it as it might avoid the need (however unlikely) to isolate down the track. Meanwhile many businesses don’t care at all about the process.
Trusting people to voluntarily disclose information and failing to understand incentives — along with what appears to be Australia’s slowest-moving tracing team — is the major reason why millions of Victorians are locked down again. Don’t blame the nebuliser.
is Crikey doing this simply to annoy? He is neither a journalist nor an expert but he has an axe to grind and that’s not what I expect from crikey. Pease tell us why you keep publishing him …..it’s not even as if he is intentionally funny either.
Crikey was started by Stephen Mayne who definitely had an ax to grind after he lost his job as Kennett’s press office when Kennett voted out of office
Western Australia locked down for 5 days after one case of community spread partly in order to give the contact tracers time to hunt down potential contacts and to get them to get tested (which apparently worked well – one journalist reported he’d been contacted because he’d pulled out of a car park immediately after the person with the infection pulled in alongside). And also to limit the number of new cases, which succeeded well beyond expectations with no new cases at all.
The ‘signing’ in of customers into premises seems to be working well. I use the government App. There’s a staff member at supermarkets ensuring customers ‘sign’ in.
i agree with the other complaints of the frequent tedious articles from Adam Schwab.
Surely, one article per week is more than enough from this guy?
Any on this topic would be several too many.
Superfluous is a mild descriptor but the ModBot would not allow more accurate ones.
does the knowledge that business “doesn’t care” come from personal experience as “boss”? or is it a more general acknowledgment that consumer capitalism isn’t fit for purpose in socially challenging times?
Both?
And several other contraindications that it is not a suitable system for a decent civilisation.
Pleeeaassee – Make the Schwabbing stop…
Just ask him about being accused of misleading and deceptive conduct back in 2015 and forking out nearly $2m.
He tends to decline to comment then.