Note: this article discusses sexual assault.
The extraordinarily privileged position that the major political parties occupy in industrial relations in Australia is rarely commented upon, mostly because the parties prefer it that way. No other employer in Australia is less accountable, more subsidised and more secretive than political parties in relation to the electoral, advisory and media staff they employ.
More correctly, taxpayers employ them. Certainly, taxpayers pay for them, but political parties control them, and are allowed — by mutual agreement — to prevent any public scrutiny of their behaviour in the way that other taxpayer-funded employees like public servants are scrutinised.
This limbo of non-accountability extends to all aspects of the behaviour of staffers and their de facto employers, politicians. And it is reinforced by the peculiar characteristics of being a political staffer: you are expected to be loyal not to the people funding your salary — the taxpayers — but the person to whom you directly answer, a politician.
And you are expected to be loyal to the party, which includes not subjecting it to unnecessary attention or embarrassment. For those truly committed, this loyalty may be rewarded in time with the chance of securing preselection. Only those who have been loyal need apply.
Political parties know perfectly well which of their MPs, ministers and shadow ministers are good bosses, and which are not. People talk. They know who the bullies are, who are the gropers, the drunks. Chiefs of staff will be employed to manage them, if they can. The rest of the staff will be expected to take one for the team and put up with it, with a vague assurance that they’ll be looked after.
Everything is to be kept quiet — only if someone has a factional interest in revealing something embarrassing, or even simply inventing something embarrassing, do we normally get a glimpse behind closed doors.
It’s an accountability-free workplace environment, tailor-made for exploitation and the amplification of normal workplace dynamics. Dynamics like that staffers tend to be young — sometimes in their first job. As ANU’s Maria Maley notes, most administrative staff are women, and 40% of political staff are.
Canberra is home for some staff but the majority are based elsewhere. Alcohol flows freely inside Parliament House offices as well as in the nightspots and restaurants of Canberra. So do other, less-legal drugs.
Male politicians of all stripes have of course long exploited the presence of large numbers of young women in their workplaces. Barnaby Joyce and Alan Tudge are only two of the more high-profile recent examples of male politicians who have given into the temptations of Parliament House while their partners were home looking after the kids. Rest assured the practice isn’t confined to Coalition MPs, by any stretch.
Nor is it confined to MPs and senators. To be a staffer, especially a more senior one, particularly in government, is to experience a giddying sense of power. You can roam the executive wing of Parliament House, hop on the VIP flights, order even the most senior public servants about, have access to the most privileged information, sit at the table — or just behind it — where the most important decisions are made while you busy yourself with intra-party business and the day-to-day labour of factional work.
An accountability-free workplace cut off from the real world, occupied by powerful, entitled people, with plenty of young people and particularly women in subordinate positions: it’s a recipe for sexual predation, as so many women, and not a few men as well, have learnt to their personal cost.
Given this poisonous environment, that Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins was allegedly sexually assaulted in Parliament House is thus, tragically, not surprising; what is unusual is her courage in speaking out about her assault and her treatment afterward (well reported by Samantha Maiden). The same courage was displayed by Rachelle Miller in revealing her treatment after her relationship with Alan Tudge and what she says she witnessed of Christian Porter’s behaviour.
Just as the political workplace is structurally toxic, so political parties are structurally unable to deal with the rapes, sexual harassment, bullying and other abuse that inevitably result from it, given their political priorities.
We’re reliant on people having the guts of Brittany Higgins to break the omerta of political staffing and reveal their abuse and pain. That’s exactly how the parties prefer it.
A final thing: if you can somehow only process what happened to Higgins, or to Miller, or to so many other women in political offices, because you’re a father of daughters — a line Scott Morrison invoked today — then your views on the subject should be immediately ruled out of court.
You don’t need to have fathered female children to understand that rape is massively underreported by women because of the way the community, employers and the criminal justice system responds. Nor do you need it to understand the power dynamics to which young people and especially young women are subjected to in workplaces.
Or, for that matter, that political parties make for deeply toxic employers.
If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault or violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au.
“because you’re a father of daughters — a line Scott Morrison invoked today”
This applies to many other issues as well. The electorate, justifiably, expects politicians to have the intellectual ability to grapple with issues in the abstract. But as this tragic case shows, more often than not, many of them only seem to have the intellectual ability to deal with issues that have a concrete relevance to them.
Hence the reason privileged private school types like most Liberals have zero empathy for the less well off.
it’s obvious that most of them care little for their daughters or their sons, otherwise they wouldn’t be working to end civilisation through climate change
Agree, roberto. I was about to say something similar – and have frequently done so on other platforms, in relation to other contexts.
Oh, did someone say “Christian Porter”?
No, but I unfortunately couldn’t help but think of the creep
It’s not just that it is so hidden, but that parliament tends to attract the worst types of people, both male and female. The toxic male stereotype is more likely to be found in parliament than any other profession, I would guess.
I think it speaks to the culture of Parliament – the one that is hidden behind closed doors – that a staffer, allegedly, has the gall to lead a colleague to Parliament (of all places!), and sexually assault her within those walls.
Perhaps, sexual assault is not tolerated in Parliament, but some level of misogyny clearly must be for such a heinous act to even be conceived of.
Thought provoking articles, this and those that follow.
Some thoughts, Morrison is framing the agenda in a way to move him to the edges of responsibility. I empathise rather than I will act, this should not happen (well der) rather than this has happened and what has allowed it to happen and what needs to change and will change? Instead set up an inquiry to “deal” with it. More active, well for a start how can it be the police had to struggle for access to parliamentary cctv? If someone had been murdered, especially a male, or even heaven forbid, someone had leaked without authorisation, cctv would have been handed over no questions asked. A change to protocol on this could be drawn up in 72 hours or less.
The point Bernard raises about the loyalty to the collective is a good one. People are always prone to being bullied or worse via their job prospects. This situation is worse because the appeal is higher, to their loyalty, identity and belonging. What else looks like this, churches, also notorious for predation.
Finally, while I don’t doubt macho culture exists across the House it should be pointed out the Coalition parties consistently have a problem with women that keeps coming up. The men outnumber the women and they profess, to varying degrees, traditional values that imply and assume women are a “group” who have their place. The men even disproportionately come from the toxic same sex private school systems. Women are not to blame for any mistreatment that occurs to them from such men but certainly they are putting themselves in danger and disadvantage just by joining them.
“Instead set up an inquiry to “deal” with it.”
Of course the inquiry will be held by insiders at the PM&C and/or a couple of LNP MPs.
One wonders if the report would ever see the light of day.
Phillip Gaetjens is probably free at the moment.
I was too soon – he’s just been given the gig!