Well shit, turns out they weren’t bluffing. This morning, Australians woke up to a newsfeed without news. Facebook has made good on its threats to block all news content in Australia overnight, hours after the government’s proposed media bargaining code, which forces tech companies to pay outlets, passed the lower house.
It’s been a chaotic morning in the media world. Editors and news directors have been locked in frantic morning meetings. Soothing statements quickly pumped out. Facebook’s ban has been both blunt and arbitrary, dragging pages nobody would consider news into its fight with the Australian government.
And if the tech giant doesn’t back down, the situation could cause huge disruption in an already turbulent Australian media landscape.
While the code has been very good for the big players so far — News Corp and Nine struck multimillion-dollar deals with Google in the past few days — smaller outlets that haven’t gotten a cent from the big tech giants are now robbed of a major source of traffic.
Who gets cut?
Facebook has never made clear what it defines as “news content”. But on this morning’s evidence, the tech giant seems to have gone nuclear and removed anything with even a vaguely newsy feel to it.
This morning, the Bureau of Meteorology was gone from Facebook. So was South Australia Health (in spite of the ongoing pandemic), Cricket Australia and the Australian Council for Trade Unions.
How did all these pages fall under Zuckerberg’s ban hammer? We do know that the government, when drafting the media code defined “news” incredibly broadly as “issues or events that are relevant in engaging Australians in public debate and in informing democratic decision-making; or current issues or events of public significance for Australians at a local, regional or national level”.
Facebook seems to have taken a similarly broad construction, leaving news feeds around the country disfigured. That’s meant smaller outlets with no real stake in the big showdown over the bargaining code have gotten screwed.
Australian National University academic Andrew Norton discovered he could no longer share links to his higher education blog this morning.
“I hadn’t even read the legislation because I didn’t think it would apply to me,” Norton told Crikey. “I guess I do cover news, but I’m not in any kind of commercial arrangement around it.”
The losers
But Norton is lucky. His blog isn’t hugely reliant on Facebook traffic. Other small publishers aren’t so fortunate. In particular, youth-oriented media sites which have built their brands on Facebook and still rely on it for traffic are worried.
A staffer at Nine-owned youth news site Pedestrian, which derives a significant chunk of its traffic from Facebook, described the situation as “chaos”, with nobody really sure what was going on.
Junkee, another youth-oriented site with a big reliance on Facebook, expressed disappointment with the decision.
“This decision will undoubtedly have an outsized effect on small and medium-sized digital publishers, which will have a significant detrimental impact on the diversity of media voices available to Australians,” it said.
But other small publishers expressed cautious optimism. Bruce Ellen, president of the Country Press Association, tells Crikey Facebook’s response “highlights the fact that the Australian government is so right in pushing for this”.
“It’s really time for Australia and the world to stand up and be counted,” Ellen said. ““The reality is that the move will only strengthen local news outlets.”
A world without news
For many Australians, Facebook is a key source of news. And for many Australians otherwise disengaged with the news, Facebook is probably the only way they keep informed, Queensland University of Technology professor Axel Bruns says.
Those people might stumble on an article because a friend shared it. That engagement, even if peripheral, is now gone.
“If that part of the news chain disappears, then those people who are encountering news don’t any more — that’s where the disruption is most significant,” Bruns said.
There’s a lot we still don’t know about Facebook’s news ban. It could all be even more brinksmanship — Treasurer Josh Frydenberg quickly cited a “constructive discussion” with Zuckerberg this morning.
The tech giant could, maybe, back down. It could tighten up its definition of news in such a way that we can all, at least, get weather updates and cricket highlights.
But what we do know is that a world without news could have worrying consequences for Australia. The ABC provides vital information for people during bushfires. Small Indigenous community organisations are also blocked.
What will be left behind is more potential disinformation, debunkable viral posts, links to YouTube conspiracy. Except now the counterweight to the fake news is gone.
Private Media, the parent company of Crikey, is a participant in the Google Showcase program. Content from Crikey and other Private Media brands is featured on Showcase as part of a commercial partnership.
So NewsCorp post an article onto their NewsCorp Facebook page and expect Facebook to pay for the priviledge of providing millions of eyeballs to them.
Facebook have made the only rational decision.
Why would anyone get news from FB anyway? Go to the news sites, like everyone else.
In any case, news organisations will quickly realise that it’s they who benefit from FB, not the other way round. Be careful what you wish for.
“Go to the news sites, like everyone else.” There’s quite the disconnect between people who rely on FB for news feeds from FB pages, often via mobile, and people like me who have half a dozen news websites that I rotate through. We’ve been having communication difficulties about this all morning!
I follow Wynnum Herald on Facebook so that I can see their stories on my newsfeed, and click through to the story. Otherwise they are buried in the Courier-Mail web-site where it is now impossible to find local news.
I get my news from Guardian Australia an independent source if ever there was one.
Independent : possibly
Objective : hardly.
Robert didn’t say ‘objective’ and quite possibly doesn’t require, or even see the possibility of, ‘objectivity’, whatever that is in news and comment publishing. Don’t know why you mentioned it. I read the Guardian simply for its being a much more interesting source with a greater degree of independence from News Corp than the rest of the ‘big’ media, including the ABC. It doesn’t need to be ‘objective’, which is a euphemism for blandly conservative in some quarters.
Aw yeah. It is about subjective reporting nowadays isn’t it? Massaged ideology. Can’t imagine how I forgot.
Oh Erasmus, is there really anything objective in news media? Oh, you have been had.
Precisely my point which has warranted five down-votes! (yippee – or despair for the reading level).
“But what we do know is that a world without news could have worrying consequences for Australia. The ABC provides vital information for people during bushfires.” Is Crikey saying people can’t access the ABC directly? That seems nonsensical to me.
No Crikey is not saying that, all websites are still viewable. They are referring to the guesstimated 20-30% of people who only get their news feed from Facebook and never visit a web site directly.
People are lazy & need re-training.
If teachers weren’t dealt the responsibility of raising the kids of double income parents (a phenomena that just happened to coincide with the Hawke/Keating years) there would have been time to emphasise the necessity to think clearly and rationally.
They were and there wasn’t.
most if not all mobile devices e.g. smartphones and tablet/pads have real browsers Chrome or Firefox; typing in a URL for the ABC or news.com.au (if that is your bent) can’t be that difficult (I speak as an ancient Boomer!)
The URL needs to be typed in only once & then saved as a favourite. Is this too hard for people…?
” A world without news”?
Bollocks. Don’t take Crikey into the world of 60 Minutes hyperbole please.
I had 7 News Toowoomba content in my FB feed after the big announcement. Linked via twitter. There are already workarounds being used.
Look to local news to make a come-back. Hopefully to the discomfort of both Rupert and Mark.