The timing of Craig Kelly’s departure is not just a political problem. It’s part of a wider growing concern about the danger of the anti-vaccination movement, particularly within media circles.
It’s a threat for all sides of the media, from the obvious right-wing extremists to the loony left and now even the moderates in the middle.
Already we are seeing uncharacteristically swift action to shut down debate, as witnessed on Ten’s The Project last night. Host and leftie darling Waleed Aly was in the midst of a heated debate with panellist Rachel Corbett over the handling of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout when he was cut off by producers in the middle of the discussion.
Make no mistake. As someone who has worked in broadcast media for decades, such a decision is not taken lightly.
And it’s not as though Aly was spouting rabid anti-vaxxer drivel. Rather he was discussing the “no jab no play” concept and pushing back against the idea of employers having too much power over the decision.
But it was obviously enough to raise warning bells — and those same alarms are going off in media rooms around the country. Last month Sky News’ Paul Murray had regular guest Pauline Hanson muted in the middle of an anti-vaccine rant.
The fact that two programs on opposite ends of the political spectrum sense the danger and are willing to act so quickly highlights how seriously it is being taken by all sides. (By way of mitigation, Sky News last night ran an hour-long anti-vax special by reporter Jane Hansen.)
Their concerns were confirmed this morning with the release of an Australian National University poll showing COVID-19 vaccine scepticism has jumped from 12.7% last August to 21.7% in January. Incredibly, 32% of Australians were “less willing” early this year to get the vaccine than they were last year.
No amount of taxpayer-funded advertising can arrest this trend if the media does not address this swiftly and not have a repeat of the silly handling of the failed COVIDSafe app.
Many in the industry have been concerned for some time at a looming danger that the traditional extreme left — which is anti-vaccination ostensibly for health reasons — is now converging with the extreme right which is anti for ideological purposes.
The anomalies have been there before. No one was surprised that hippies in the Byron Bay hinterland were wary of vaccines they perceived as some kind of authoritarian threat.
But it was a shock that the next lowest vaccination rate area was Sydney’s elite eastern suburbs where a cohort of ill-informed “yummy mummies” were just as vulnerable to wellness cults and conspiracy theories — all while taking illegal substances themselves. They’ve even moved on to an anti-vaxxing push against poor dogs.
It’s interesting to note that the biggest group of sceptics in the ANU poll were young women.
The fact certain sections of the mainstream media are so attuned to the nuances of the debate even over free speech concerns is a reflection of the widespread community support for the government’s program.
However, the very success of Australia in keeping the virus under control means everyone has to be even more vigilant against complacency. It should not be left to individual presenters to police the problem. A good test will be if Sky resists the temptation to give Kelly his own show.
FYI, “hippies in the Byron Bay hinterland” are not the “extreme left”
I picked that one out too. What a blooper by the author!
If I thought she was up to it I’d ask for an comparison between extreme Left and extreme Right. At the limit, there are more similarities than differences; at least in regard to personal freedom.
I wish someone would enlighten me as to who this ‘extreme left’ is, and where they live.
Names? Places? Can anyone pin them down?
In Australia, not since the 70s. Otherwise try any authorative text on the Russian Revolution from the 1880s or Wild Swans in the case of Mao. Kissinger’s “On China” is worth a glance.
An important line was crossed when The Project silenced Aly. This is not an anti-vax issue. It’s not even whether the government can decide what is good for your health and then force it on you. Rachel Corbett’s argument is that the government should decide what is good for business and then force it on you, even if it is something as intrusive/invasive as a medical procedure.
WTF?
It’s not that it’s “good for your health”. By not getting vaccinated, you’re a threat to the whole community. The government does have broader powers in that circumstance
There is state legislation in their various health acts as well. But if they ever invoked them there would be hell to pay.
Technically, not to those who have been vaccinated or under age 45; hence (as conveyed previously) it is no big problem. Just keep an eye on the value for Ra over the next few months.
What it is – is not the point. I was clearly summarising what Rachel Corbett was saying. My point is that RC argued that what is good for business is what must decide policy.
What powers the government has to protect communities is an entirely separate issue. I’m all for vaccination. What I find disturbing is the idea that government should be run by and for business, with the population nothing but a resource for business, much like the domesticated animals on a farm.
Ah.. yeah, but in broad terms, has it ever been otherwise?
Moreover, it is the electorate which votes any particular mob into parliament with no great emphasis (the legislation reflects) on the individual (postal voting on social matters anyone)!
Rachel Corbett is an over opinionated systemic sh-ll and should r-sign immediately.
I agree with Janine Perret. The right and the left are now united in the push-back against a common enemy – “State Forced Medical Procedures” The insidious vaccinations of it’s people.
“Insidious vaccinations”?? Please, not on Crikey.
Probably doesn’t know the word’s meaning – unless the vaccines are sentient and intent on entrapping & betraying us all… to the Great Beast Gates.
Ms Perrett’s resort to cliche: “loony left”, “leftie darling”, “yummy mummies” calls to mind the lazy insults of the Newscorp press, a way of refusing to engage with the ideas of those with whom you have decided to disagree in advance, regardless of any argument they may put forward.
It is aimed at pushing the boundaries of what is considered reasonable discussion so far to the right that ideas that were once considered moderate are now claimed to be risible. It’s an especially ugly feature of the lurch of our media to the right in recent years.
And a number of those commenting are clearly not in the real world either. Have none of them friends or relatives in other countries where the virus is wreaking havoc? Don’t they read outside the nutter circle eg rates of infection declining where a country has already vaccinated a load of the population at least once? This is what puts me of Crikey – it’s not balance, it’s just gutter stuff.
Wreaking havoc means dying from the flu in old age.?- Not much wreaking there.
You’re denying science with semantics. People died much earlier than they would have.
Appreciate your help and thanks for caving. Your fellow brothers and sisters Owen you. me2
Here’s a song for scottycansing. Just replace the words “Minnie the Moocher” with “Scotty the Vaxxer” and wallah!
I agree Lethell.
The crux of the article was lost amongst the disparaging name calling. Silly.
The more I see/hear journos gushing excitedly about shipments of vaccines arriving along with photo ops of politicians receiving a jab, the more cynical I become.
I am not an anti-vaxxer but the over-baked campaign by the media & government reeks of old-fashioned propaganda.
The most convincing populist promotion for Covid vaccines was the ad by Sirs Elton John & Michael Caine. Leave it to the professionals.
Yeah, it’s so pathetic it’s funny. Everybody from the the Queen to Hirahuto (sp) is seen getting the jab. How pathetic was “Scotty th Vaxxer”? Do they actually think we are that stupid to believe the BullSh-t?. And what about those “nymphet” type young network journos, microphone in hand, when they introduce news of arriving vaccine shipments. i swear I saw one of them reach a physical crescendo, aka a climax.
Crescendo doesn’t mean climax, sliv. You don’t reach a crescendo, it’s the journey.
SillySliv’s vocabulary – is interesting and usually wrong – probably uses a picture dictionary with lots of bright colours and simple drawings.
Sliv is fluent in Incomprehensible Paranoid Nutbaggery
Following from Agni, a sense of “increase” is important which is not captured by the word ‘journey’. Perhaps the word ‘zenith’ was intended.
“the loudest point reached in a gradually increasing sound” Crescendo
Hmmmm Hmmmm if you guys don’t know it goes with the territory then I am afraid yuz missed the boat. maybe it’s just been a while for yuz both.
The whole of the ABC & SBS should be held down & vaccinated –otherwise NO Job !
Off course that won’t happen because I doubt mant of them would willingly accept. But-they will push it for us all knowing full well the wealth of information being denied for us to easily see or hear.
BINGOOOOOOOO!!!
I found myself utterly convinced by one of the very first inoculatees here, in among SmoKo’s photo-op.
She was a young nurse, just so full of Life & Hope for the future, her vitality and the obvious intelligence of her reasoning for having her shot went far to changing my curmudgeonly attitude.
Do you mean she’s on the pay-role so she better do it or she can look elsewhere for employment? Some call it a br-be and some call it blackma-l and some just call it FEAR tactics.
No, it was someone with their a great deal more knowledge of the subject than you could even pretend to imagine having and a whole life of joy & happiness ahead of them.
So utterly unlike you.
I keep waiting for you to stop playing devil’s advocate.
“& happiness ahead of them.
So utterly unlike you.”
So you prefer a fool’s paradise?
It has been ever thus with covid, zut. Good news is always pumped up into something it is not. Because the alternative (the vaccine is of limited usefulness in fighting covid) is too awful to contemplate.
I suspect this is not a left/right issue.
I thought that was more or less the central point made by the article.
It’s a paranoid Nutbag issue
That’s for sure.