This is part three of #MeTooWhere? Crikey’s exploration of the past, present and future of the Me Too movement. Read the introduction here, part one here and part two here.
The Me Too movement has fostered a sense of community — women stand strong together, hugging, crying, supporting.
But there’s a distinct demographic at the heart of Australia’s movement: middle-class cis white women. This is a massive concern. Although sexual violence affects everyone, not everyone benefits in the same ways from calling it out.
As feminist scholar Nilmini Fernando told Crikey: “[White women] strive for equality with white men … which focuses on the idea that success and equality will trickle down,” she said.
Women of colour, she says, fight for justice and equality for the collective.
Sense of community lacking from today’s feminism
Second-wave feminism’s slogan across the ’60s, ’70s and ’80s was “the personal is political”. The movement focused on equality and discrimination, criticising male-dominated practices throughout society.
Feminist academic Eva Cox participated in many of the marches: “We wanted to change the values of masculinity so that the feminised stuff had the same value as the blokey stuff — like money and power and war and business.”
This isn’t to say women of colour weren’t left out of the movement, but overall its goals were more inclusive. Cox doesn’t think this is a case of looking at the past through rose-tinted glasses but is instead down to the rise of neoliberalism which has put free-market capitalism, privatisation and competition between individuals above welfare and the collective good.
One example of this, she says, is how we talk about childcare. In the ’80s it was framed as a necessity for children and families’ welfare. Now it’s discussed in terms of the impact it would have on the female workforce and GDP.
“We’ve got a very deteriorated sense of what community is and the morality of taking care of people because that doesn’t fit into neoliberalism because it’s largely done unpaid by women,” she said.
COVID-19 has exposed this disparity, with women holding most essential worker roles and shouldering domestic duties while working from home.
The latest budget pledges $150 million of previously announced funding to reduce domestic and family violence. This represents just 0.3% of the $500 billion budget.
Indigenous voices risk being ‘tacked on’
March4Justice was met with mixed responses from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and women of colour. Some believed the rallies incorporated their views but others, including Yuin woman and Aboriginal postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Wollongong Dr Marlene Longbottom, feels Indigenous issues are seen to be on the periphery.
“In Australia when you start to talk about diversity, you tend to see diversity in terms of not necessarily Indigenous women or women of colour but white women with different coloured hair,” she said.
“Our issues are never white women’s issues unless it’s actually happening to them.”
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their children experience violence at 3.1 times the rate of non-Indigenous women and are 35 times more likely to experience domestic and family violence. They’re 11 times more likely to die due to an assault than non-Indigenous women. Three in five Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women have experienced physical or sexual violence perpetrated by a male intimate partner, compared with one in four women across all demographics.
Distinct from white Australia’s individualist culture, Longbottom says, Indigenous people think in collective terms, incorporating the family, community, and men: “Aboriginal women see it as responsibility and our place in the community, whereas white women believe it’s more of a rights issue.”
Sexual violence is never considered a standalone issue but as a symptom of inequality caused by colonialism. Indigenous Australians die from avoidable causes at three times the rate of non-Indigenous Australians and have shorter life expectancies. About 80% of Indigenous adults have weekly incomes below the national average earnings. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults make up around 2% of the population but 27% of the national prison population.
Nyungar woman and human rights lawyer Dr Hannah McGlade was the first speaker at the March4Justice in Western Australia.
“The local organisers were very respectful to Indigenous women,” she told Crikey, but she stressed Indigenous women had been fighting for feminism and equality for a long time — independent of white women.
“Society is paying a lot of attention here, but the problem here for Indigenous women is that violence has been normalised, excused and rendered invisible,” she said.
She said a national council on violence against Aboriginal women is an immediate necessity, as is an inquiry into murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls.
Inclusivity is key
Consulting with members of the community is crucial, disability advocate Carly Findlay tells Crikey, but that didn’t really happen during the March4Justice rallies. When she brought this to the organisers’ attention on social media, she got defensive responses.
“I acknowledge the events were put together in a short amount of time by volunteers, but we’ve done the work on access and inclusion so this info could have been sourced and implemented,” she said.
“[Organisers need to] constantly consult with and include disabled people in planning and activities. Though I feel we need to move beyond being consulted with — we’ve spent a long time doing this. Just include us.”
About 36% of women with a disability have experienced intimate partner violence, and 64% of Australians with disabilities experience physical, social, intimate partner violence or emotional abuse.
Fernando said this sort of behaviour showed white women gatekeeping issues and closing ranks.
“There’s a real ignorance of not wanting to really engage with our literature, whether it be academic literature or in the newspapers or in activism,” she said. “It’s not just a simple matter of inclusion. What I’m talking about is the power to shape the narrative and take control of it.”
If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault or violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au.
Do you feel included in the Me Too movement, or are you one of the many left behind? Write to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication in Crikey’s Your Say section.
Next: What do we want the Me Too movement to achieve? Change, obviously. It must be more than just a mood board.
brilliant article.
Achieved a lot in a short length. And well backed-up with perspectives from three scholars, one lawyer and one advocate.
Yep, writer left heaps of real estate for lots of sane and specific expert input.
I find this so confronting when many aboriginal womens rights activists are so readily prepared to disparage, sledge and condemn “white” women for white supremacist attitudes and the horrors of colonization, while simultaneously heaping additional damnation on the same feminists for not appropriately and strongly forefronting their needs to counter misogyny and male violence.
What is the way forward feeling united in our need to counter oppression?
Is there any progress on untested rape kits in Australia?
Has Ms Higgin’s rape kit actually been DNA tested? That man may well have raped other women and not been identified.
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2018/02/24/rape-kits-storage/
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/08/an-epidemic-of-disbelief/592807/
It seems to me to be an egregious example of police failing to believe women that could be easily addressed and return concrete outcomes.
This may be peripherally related, but all of the policy change is meaningless if the institutions that should be protecting women don’t follow through and uphold enlightened policies or law.
You make tons of great points but ill call you out on this one ‘Sexual violence is never considered a standalone issue but as a symptom of inequality caused by colonialism’.
The research I’ve read showed that sexual violence in island cultures was endemic before white men arrived. Those early anthropologists painted an ideal of islander lifestyle which turned out to be confected.
Yes, its a product of male dominance in those native societies, but i feel you are deliberately trying to conflate first nation rage towards white people and white womens rage towards men so as to create an alliance and maintain critical mass.
You make tons of great points but ill call you out on this one ‘Sexual violence is never considered a standalone issue but as a symptom of inequality caused by colonialism’.
…The research I’ve read showed that sexual violence in island cultures was endemic before white men arrived. Those early anthropologists painted an ideal of island lifestyle which turned out to be confected.
……..Yes, its a product of male dominance in those societies, but i feel you are deliberately trying to conflate first nation rage towards white people and white womens rage towards men so as to create an alliance and maintain critical mass.
My families are black & white. I am not trying to conflate rage. I am trying to set the record straight.
………..but its also painfully clear that destruction of the fabric of a culture always leads social breakdown. This then always results in many vices. Abuse, drugs, crime. I agree that white people are solely responsible for destroying Aboriginal culture, im just questioning whether pre-invasion Australia was as idealic from a feminist perspective as implied here. Happy to be proven wrong.
Ultimately Im trying to ensure rage against white people and white rage against men are kept appropriately separate so that the true nature of the problem is understood and solutions suggested have the best chance of succeeding.
Our English teacher when I was in high school was a bit ahead of the curve and got us to read The Fatal Impact by Alan Moorehead. It was an eye-opener at the time and I’ve just re-read it over 30 years later – it’s stood the test of time pretty well considering and is still a good read on the colonisation of the South Pacific.
Moorehead did a great job calling out the colonisers’ sense of cultural superiority, with lots of “show-don’t tell” in it too, plus he looked at the tendency for some European philosophers (e.g. Diderot) to idealise the indigenous cultures. Sir George Grey, one of the early observers in Australia (and yes, like anyone capable of bias and projection, but he’s considered one of the more reliable sources by the author), was quoted as follows: “The early life of a young woman at all celebrated for beauty is generally one continued series of captivity to different masters, of ghastly wounds, of wanderings in strange families, of rapid flights, of bad treatment from older females amongst whom she is brought a stranger by her captor…” and attests to savage beatings usually about the head. Moorehead always contrasts those sorts of observations with the many positive aspects of indigenous societies compared to our own – instead of presenting a one-sided, rose-tinted viewpoint. So yes, lots and lots of things Western societies can learn from indigenous societies, for sure, and need to learn, in order to turn our global Titanic around – but there never was an Eden and no society was ever perfect…
Ok, that does it. Tomorrow expect a question on quantum physics. Ill find the chink in your knowledge eventually.
Try motor mechanics! 😉 Probably your best bet. 😛
I had some superb teachers, and was and am interested in lots of things, and consequently ended up teaching in a number of different subject areas. We live in a library at our house and hardly turn on the TV. Our book stacks teeter. So few years, so many books…
Quantum physics is rudimentary and was better when I was actually teaching Physics. 😉 The topic fascinated a lot of my students. But Brian Cox makes it all so super interesting.
Got to tell you, I’m just waiting for the hatred to rain down on me for not believing in any Eden and any kind of perfection when it comes to humans. 😉
When you strip away human self righteousness we are animals at heart and act like animals when culture doesn’t prevent us from doing so.
…my animals think this is insulting! 😉 They say they can’t think of a worse species and can’t understand the unfair comparison!
Sure, until its dinner time.
Most of them are herbivores and fend for themselves for calories! 🙂
…I’ve got no idea what kind of person would find it negative or offensive when someone looks after herbivores. Says rather a lot about them, doesn’t it. Talk about judging on minimal understanding… we run an eco-sanctuary. 😛
Actually I was going to report you to Crikey for that comment myself. Take it easy on our fury friends.
You’ve got to be kidding me.
“Fury” seems to be a Freudian slip.
Yes Im kidding you. Someone here doesn’t like herbivores obviously.
[Sarcasm]
I always use an emoji when I do that so that’s clear. 😉
My hunch is not that they don’t like herbivores, but that they are militant vegans and object to food animal grazing (but think it’s OK to grow soy even though it results in a lot of wildlife habitat clearing, agrochemical and fossil fuel use, and that such monocultures are completely incompatible with wildlife on the same land – etc etc).
Or that they don’t like that I’m talking to you – you’ve been downvoted a bit for not toeing the line and asking some inconvenient questions and even some of my +1s to you have been “neutralised” by this person/persons.
Or perhaps they don’t like what I’m saying elsewhere, because I’ve been downvoted in other places on this thread too (sudden loss of previous + points).
Or perhaps they are a random downvoter for kicks because they don’t have anything better to do (lack of imagination, integrity etc).
In any case, they’ve not had the spine to raise their actual issue(s) with me in conversation, so far.
Reminds me of the WW1 Christmas truce soccer game. Humanizing the enemy didn’t go down too well with the brass.
Got a human exceptionalist or general grump downvoting around here, apparently!
And in PS, I kind of get how easy it is to feel ostracised in a debate for belonging to some kind of group that’s being painted with a broad brush. Which really, when you look at it, is so many groups, depending on who is holding the paintbrush… and it’s all bollocks, and we’re never going to solve our problems with an us-and-them approach…and here’s a good song on that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iP1BuZIRAY
Nothing like the arts to lift us out of our slimy pond. 🙂
There is a huge imbalance in the research. Male anthropologists had no access to women, our stories & lore.
Until recently, there was no work done by female anthropologists.
The work you researched is unbalanced, does not represent Aboriginal culture from both male & female perspectives. It is one sided. Please tell me where you found the information that sexual violence was endemic. And why one white man’s word is more powerful than the voices of many women?
Its a long time ago, but the work of Margaret Mead is one that comes to mind, noting that she researched indigenous cultures outside of Australia. Hence my reference to ‘island cultures’.
I think you are correct that Aboriginal women had more egalitarian roles back in the 1700’s than European women did given the impact that the Industrial Revolution had on European cultural fabric. My comments were directed at present day white women who might see the treatment of Aboriginal women by Aboriginal men as being more idealic than it was, ie by modern standards. Looks like i need to do some more reading.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of my cranky replies. I have reread & see that you really do care. A book you might enjoy is “Talking Up to the White Woman’ by Aileen Morton-Robinson. Its been out for awhile now. There are also many emerging amazing young Aboriginal women speaking out & writing now. So much to discover.
Hi Penny
Im going to try and read that. Well outside my normal reading material but hey, all the more reason to read it. Feel free to hold me to that a couple of months from now.
Sorry to you (and others) if my approach to gender issues comes across as clinical and heartless. That’s the downside of a science education. Im a bit more of a Doctor Spock, but we need a well rounded crew to run this big blue ship at warp speed.
Thank you. I get cranky on this forum sometimes as there are a few old dinosaurs here (not you) that I find hard to deal with. Others get caught in the cross fire. Apologies.
Dear Penny, I’m so glad you came back to smooth things over, because I generally like your comments but really winced at one of your sentences to Curious. I get cranky sometimes too and I’m sure I’ve hit out because of it – and if it lands unjustly then it just adds to the general misery of trying to get our society out of the swamps it makes for itself…
Happy Easter!
Thank you. Happy easter. Sometimes I say things I regret, sometimes I say things that get misinterpreted, so its good to read back & see. Sometimes other writers comments or responses have stirred up deep anger. Its hard to be calm about some issues.
We will have to agree to disagree on this one.