If bullshitting was a cardinal sin, George Pell would be in trouble.
In an Easter column in The Australian the cardinal waxed lyrical about the Eternal City. He lauds Italy for having “at least” two government-sponsored television stations (although there’s really only one that matters, and Italy ranks below Australia in Reporters Without Borders’ annual Press Freedom Index).
The thumbs-up to Italy, though, is just a little device to allow Pell to have a crack at the “Gramscian” ABC, a reference to the trope of “cultural Marxism”, a debunked conspiracy theory that has been found to be anti-Semitic.
He suggests Australia should have an alternative national broadcaster (presumably one that did not bother to cover the peccadilloes of the Catholic Church).
There’s not enough room here to go through his supernatural claims about whether or not a dude called Jesus was the son of God. Or if, indeed, God exists. There’s also not enough space to wade through the Pet Sematary-esque claims about the resurrection of the aforementioned son of God, or the notion of miracles.
It’s also not really possible, in a column about the preponderance of bullshit, to start tackling claims that are not falsifiable. So let’s stop the self-flagellation and move on.
What is entirely falsifiable is Pell’s claim that Australians don’t give a fig leaf about the “Christian origins” of Easter.
Pell spends much of his precious broadsheet real estate bemoaning the little colony down south and its ignorance of Christian teaching. “Most of the poor and all of the taxi drivers in Rome have a viewpoint on religion and the Vatican,” he writes.
“In Australia, everyone enjoys the Easter break, as they enjoy the Queen’s Birthday holiday, but many haven’t much of a notion about the Christian origins of the celebration, even of Good Friday.”
The Christian origins of Easter?
For Christ’s sake. Believe in miracles, in the son of a God crawling out of a tomb to ascend bodily to Heaven, if that’s your faith.
But to wilfully ignore the actual, factual origins of Easter in the rush to perpetuate the culture wars is self-indulgent tosh. Easter’s origins are pagan. It’s in the name, derived from the pre-Christian goddess Eostre. It’s in the timing, dictated by the movements of the sun and moon, coinciding with spring equinox in the northern hemisphere. It’s even in the symbolism of eggs and bunnies as fertility symbols.
It was eventually adopted by Christianity, but did not originate with Christianity.
Pell’s self-righteousness is so ingrained he imagines devils where there are none. He’s trying to exorcise non-existent ghosts at the ABC, and to perpetrate the idea that there is some existential threat to life as we know it.
Pell believes that “there were no bones in the tomb after the resurrection”. He believes in miracles. But he also believes something patently false, that Easter sprung fully formed from Christianity (a Virgin birth, if you will).
Perhaps his dismissal of history shouldn’t come as a surprise. This is a guy who once described people who want action on climate change as modern-day pagans.
“In the past, pagans sacrificed animals and even humans in vain attempts to placate capricious and cruel gods — today they demand a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions,” he said.
You can’t make this shit up.
If there is a God, then surely Cardinal Pell isn’t someone he or she could possibly wish to have pontificating on their behalf?
I’m not so sure. The God depicted in the bible gets a kick out of testing the faithful, e.g. see the book of Job, where God and Satan bet each other about how far the remarkably devout Job can be pushed without breaking.
You got it in one. You can’t make this shit up!
By casting emission reductions as a pagan ritual, Pell has contradicted the Pope. Perhaps it is time he explained himself before the Inquisition.
In the understanding of common folk, religion might explain away climate disasters, but science retains the power to predict them.
Interesting point, too many conservative Catholics and/or Christians criticise Pope Francis for having ‘Christian values’….. ditto Angela Merkel.
Related, some of the NewsCorp/LNP grifters turning up on news programs, when relevant, literally dribble (embarrassingly to impress) about Pope Francis, Angela Merkel, the EU et al. for projecting ‘values’, e.g. empathetic towards refugee or immigrants and the need for climate action.
One cannot describe how far Australia’s image or (formerly cool) brand has slipped in past two decades in the eyes of normal people elsewhere i.e. becoming aggressively white Christian nationalist, supporting fossil fuels and war, or simply a cheap knock off of the US…. while also fawning to the UK or ‘mother country’.
Thought ’80-’90s Labor brought Australia out of its slumber but no it has returned …..
It was Whitlam who wanted the Sleepers Awake in the early 70s.
Trouble is, the citizenry did not like the reality they found and chose to go back to sleep, especially the young which, personally, I found most distressing.
The HawKeating class traitors of the 80s locked this country into the ugly neolib nightmare of Thatcher/Reaganism and none have made a dent in it since.
Poor Fella, my Country.
Are we referring to Bach, Ken Patchen or Barry Jones (Sleepers Wake)?
If the title of the recent book by Jones is familiar (What is to be Done – sounds better in Russian) it might be because it deals with the same stuff.
On another thread I left a cf to you as one of the few here who would even know the author, let alone my allusion.
Oh you can’t blame the young Agni. This is all baby boomer conservatism and entitlement. The young had teachers and parents, I’d look there to find fault.
Mike Moore, who has been been recording across generations for quite some time, would disagree.
There are orders of magnitude more information available to school leavers now compared with those who grew up in the 60s but, ironically, the school leavers are considerably less informed; even in regard to basic geography. Moreover, every State recognises a current “crisis” in literacy.
Nothing to do with entitlement DB.
Brekky – I was at fault because my syntax did not clarify that my use of “the young” referred to those who were young in the 70/80s.
A spoilt & irresponsible cohort who spurned their birthright – the glorious inheritance of the Enlightenment – for the toys & gee-gaws of neolib nutbaggery.
Perhaps, Agni, you are overlooking the educational “reforms” that were commissioned from the mid 70s. While far from perfect the system DID produce results although not everyone received a prize. The “reforms” have got us to where we are now.
As this discussion (along with that of vaccines) illustrates looking stuff up is effective ONLY when one is in possession of a verifiable context in the first place. Contrary to the educational assumptions of four decades ago, it does not work in general. god knows what comes to be quoted.
Yep, all the progress of the 80s and 90s has gone, we’re back to small minds and white picket fences, and how dare you question my authority mindlessness. Conservative heaven. We are a tiny people again.
At the risk of appearing “picky” you seem to be assaulting (abusing?) conservativeism which does have a strict ideological meaning yet all too often confused with “traditional” values.
Pell is riding a slow horse that is trending slower.
I assume Pell was appalled at the pro-Trump Murdoch media, or was he convinced that Trump was a true believer doing the chosen ones work and only Rupert understood ?
Please explain George.
George, like Scott, doesn’t believe in, or care about anything except himself
Tory; I think you are a bit out of your depth here with regard to the origins of Easter. A quick Google search suggests one possibility of several is as you suggest. I would have thought someone of integrity would have offered readers the other alternatives as well; instead of suggesting you were the font of knowledge. Just to help you out; the Easter timing IS centered around the equinox but from a Christian’s perspective is linked to the date of the Jewish Passover. In fact you may be interested to read in some detail how and when the Christian use of the word Easter originated in
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2017-04-12/why-easter-is-called-easter-and-other-little-known-facts-about-the-holiday
The equinox date coincides with celebrations around the world related to the definitive change of seasons as we move from night longer than day to day longer than night and Yes people have used the equinox as a ferttility celebration since before written history.
It would be nice, if before you attempt a pile on against people who do not share your narrow perspectives on life, you actually got all of the pertinent facts on the table for consideration
Warren
Warren
Thanks for sharing this link… very succinct.
Tory
Thanks for writing about Easter … perhaps explore other some of the range of insights about the Christian message as you prepare to write about Pentecost.
Happy to point you in the direction of an exceptional (female) Anglican theologian in Canberra.
Agreed Warren, the difference between Christian and Pagan is chiefly semantics, and Tory should have tried harder to explain that…but believe what you will.
It would be nice, if Pell, before attempting a pile on against people who do not share his narrow perspectives on life, actually got all of the pertinent facts on the table for consideration.
Like the philosophers in H2G2, what Pell & his ilk demand are NOT “…all of the pertinent facts on the table” – that would be the end of their power.
The insistence of Vroomfondel & Majikthise “… on rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty…” to ensure that a bemused, confused populace continue to support them in the style to which they wish to become accustomed.
Re Easter equinox,”…as we move from night longer than day to day longer than night…”?
Only if ‘we‘ lived in the northern hemisphere.
Fortunately we do not.
Leave the dying kulturs to bury their dead religions & social structures – they deserve it.