When Michael Johnsen resigned as the Nationals MP for the Upper Hunter over an allegation of rape (an allegation he denies), he triggered a byelection that will be fought over a single issue: coal.
The now-marginal Nationals stronghold lies at the heart of NSW coal country. So it was little surprise yesterday when state Nationals leader and deputy premier John Barilaro “saluted” a coal train chugging through Muswellbrook. Hours later, the party preselected David Layzell, a local construction manager, as its candidate.
Barilaro backs his man. He praised Layzell as delivering “one of the most impressive speeches” he’d ever heard, and, perhaps more crucially, marked him as someone who understood mining.
The dark horse
But Layzell is a bit of a dark horse. Until the 11th hour, Singleton Mayor Sue Moore was being talked up as the Nats’ desired pick. A local cattle farmer who became the town’s first female mayor in 2008 (and has held the office ever since), Moore seemed like a good choice for a party that has historically failed to promote women — especially in light of the allegation levelled against Johnsen.
On paper, Layzell seems like a bit of an unknown quantity. He ran for Dungog Shire Council as an independent in 2017. A year later, he became chair of the Nationals’ Upper Hunter conference, and mused about the possibility of running instead of Johnsen in the 2019 election.
We don’t know for sure why Moore was beaten at the preselection yesterday. But we do know that, in the last year or so, she’d started to seem a little soft on coal.
Moore was part of a conference looking to diversify the region’s economy in anticipation of a post-coal future. While she says the industry is here for a few decades at least, she’s spoken to The Guardian and The Sydney Morning Herald about the need for a transition rooted in farming everything from medicinal marijuana to mushrooms.
While endorsing Layzell yesterday, Barilaro noted the candidate as someone who understood “land use conflict but is supportive of mining, farming, agriculture and vineyards”.
The coal election
Even if Moore’s realistic stance on the mining sector didn’t lead to her demise, there’s no denying just how politically potent coal is in the Upper Hunter.
Mining symbolises the well-paying blue-collar jobs that have supported the community for generations. But it’s also a politically toxic and unsustainable industry; its terminal decline has accelerated as the rest of the world moves to a renewable future.
“They’re on a coal crusade in the Hunter,” 2GB radio host Ben Fordham said, as he introduced Barilaro this morning.
Later on, Barilaro and Layzell held their first press conference in hard hats and hi-vis.
Labor is also aggressively courting the mining vote. It’s widely believed that coal miner, Muswellbrook deputy mayor and CFMEU official Jeff Drayton will be the party’s candidate of choice. Already, Labor’s federal member for coal Hunter Joel Fitzgibbon is insisting the party must “set aside any opposition to mining” in order to win the seat.
One Nation’s Mark Latham — also aggressively pro-coal — now says he’s also planning a run.
But zoom out from Singleton, Dungog and Muswellbrook and coal becomes a politically divisive industry tearing rifts through both major parties. Fitzgibbon’s opportunistic grandstanding on behalf of the mining industry has triggered war in the Labor caucus. And this week, NSW Environment Minister Matt Kean had to backflip on a decision to make Malcolm Turnbull the state’s emissions czar, facing a backbench revolt. There was also plenty of hand-wringing about how the appointment of Turnbull, who wants a moratorium on coal projects, would play in the Upper Hunter.
This morning, Barilaro told Fordham the doorstoppers in the electorate couldn’t stand the former prime minister.
“The truth is, mate, they see him as someone who’s out of touch … a millionaire from Point Piper lecturing them on what sort of lifestyle they should lead, what sort of jobs they should have,” he said.
There’s plenty of desperation in the Nats’ mining play. The seat is on a 2% margin. Lose it, and the Coalition would have to crawl its way to the election without a working majority.
And, in this desperation, there’s an omen for election cycles to come: as long as there are marginal seats in coal country, mining will always have a future in Australia.
Here we go again. Reality: we have to have zero output of CO2 as soon as possible. The politics: we must keep burning coal as long as possible although of course we’re aiming for zero CO2. The politics is not compatible with reality, is it?
An unseen factor that keeps coal miners hanging on is their pay. They are paid more than doctors (GPs). Loggers were the same. They would have cut down the last tree on earth to keep their pay (more than GPs). So who can blame them? Well, me, for one. Stop it.
CO2 has just gone through 420ppm. The fires and floods we’re having are not normal. They’re not even the new normal. They’re one step up on the staircase which ends with sea levels back where they were for most of the planet’s history – 70 metres higher. Temperatures 6 degrees C hotter (at least). Farming? Forget it. Food? Good luck with that one too. Oh, but we have to keep burning coal! Any politician who says that is an idiot, and a danger to us all. Jobs? There are far more good clean jobs in renewables than there ever were in coal. So lets for God’s sake get on with The Good Change. Coal kills hordes of people every year – that’s reality.
A political party that promotes coal will soon be another victim of coal. Dead, and good riddance.
No one is telling the truth in our major parties but folks ain’t all stupid.
Really?
The voting records suggest otherwise.
We will make no difference by closing the Hunter’s coal mines. The woorld will buy as much coal as it thinks it needs. However, coal has been allowed to do as it likes and that is a serious issue. Barilaro is a complete tool who is owned by developers and miners, but likes to pretend he represents farmers. The need to protect water resources is utterly foreign to Nationals.
But why open new mines? Not supplying coal to the world would make a difference, to price, furthering its demise. It’s time to act. The ostrich policy is rank stupidity.
I wonder how many actual farmers and other agricultural/rural business folk still believe the the Nats are still rooting for their cause?
The National(Mining) Party has lost much of its base to the Greens and the Fishers and Shooters because of its disregard for the loss of scarce arable farming land and aquifer damage by open cut coal mining
I suspect many rural folk are starting to understand that the Nats are rooting their cause.
The NSW Nationals,
canteringgalloping their way to irrelevance.The nats have been a blight on the political landscape for the last couple of decades.
Having hopelessly sold out to their mates in fossil fuel, often at the expense of their alleged farming constituency, the party line on all things coal is utterly predictable.
But the Labor party capitulation is what really rankles.
They should be thinking beyond this by-election and marking out their turf into the future.
The notion that miners (and apparently no-one else) are entitled to six figure incomes in perpetuity for poisoning the joint is utter BS.
If they haven’t bothered reading the tea leaves that’s their problem.
Meanwhile the ALP is going to play an insane zero some game of being all things to all people and in the process standing for nothing.
Special thanks to Joel Fitzgibbon.
How’s that post-political gig looking mate?
This would be so different were the “Labor” party worth feeding.
Alas,it is not.
Long ago, in the 80s, when the necrotic worms embedded themselves in the bowels of Sussex St it ceased to be fit for purpose.
Any purpose – apart from making tory governments seem the evil of two lessers.
Bring in a strong independent, beholden to no major party, willing to behave and vote with integrity and committed to transitioning from coal to renewables without the loss of a job.
And watch them win…
Independents, familiar to and representative of their own constituents – not a novel idea, it is specified in the Constitution – are the only hope to rid the body politic of the vile corruption that makes it unfit for human involevment.
You know it makes sense!
And might Sue Moore do that? I doubt it, no doubt continuing to claim the best
personman was chosen. What a farce.