This is the second story in a series. Read the first story here.
Note: the following article discusses sexual assault.
The case of young international student Anna Crenshaw, who was indecently assaulted at a Hillsong gathering in Sydney in 2016, has continued to expose serious flaws in how the mega-church of Pastor Brian Houston handles claims of harassment.
As we revealed yesterday, Crenshaw ran up against a thicket of long-standing close ties at the highest levels of Hillsong when she decided to report her assault to the organisation in 2018.
And despite Hillsong’s protestations that it has done the right thing by her, the case has not gone away.
After an account of Crenshaw’s ordeal was published in The Christian Post in April, Houston attacked the story in a tweet, saying: “A number of things in the article are factually wrong, but abuse is NEVER OK. My understanding is Anna was originally abused in her father’s church in Pennsylvania. That makes it sadder. Whether abuse happens in Pennsylvania or Australia, it’s tragic.”
Houston later deleted the tweet and apologised for having “foolishly included information that was wrong for me to share”.
Anna Crenshaw’s father, Pastor Ed Crenshaw, who runs the Victory evangelical church in Philadelphia, had saved and republished Houston’s tweet.
It has added to an air of crisis surrounding Hillsong’s US operations, where the church has been hit by a series of scandals this year, including cases of pastors engaging in extramarital affairs and donations being used to fund lavish lifestyles.
Houston has already taken part in a major US television interview to answer questions about the church.
Inq can reveal that as part of its crisis management Hillsong has engaged lawyers from the Los Angeles office of the international law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to conduct an “independent” review of how it had handled the Crenshaw case, including the rights and wrongs of allowing the offender, Jason Mays, to return to a paid role at Hillsong.
Mays, whose father John Mays has worked with the Houstons for more than 35 years, had pleaded guilty in a magistrates court to “assault with an act of indecency” and was barely 12 months into serving a two-year good behaviour bond before he returned to work at the church.
One attorney assigned to the investigation has expertise in representing “companies and individuals in high stakes litigation” and advises clients “navigating both the court of law and the court of public opinion”, according to her bio. The lawyer had helped launch the firm’s crisis law and strategy practice group, which provides “legal and public relations assistance to companies and individuals facing scandals in the public eye”.
The other lawyer’s bio boasts that she excels in formulating “legal strategy and written product that will demolish the opposing side”.
The investigation is due to be finished shortly. How independent it is remains to be seen. Hillsong declined to answer Inq’s questions on whether or not the law firm has any previous or ongoing relationship with Hillsong, and whether or not it would make the investigation public.
In Ed Crenshaw’s view, though, Hillsong would never have initiated this “independent investigation” had Houston not tweeted “something that was undeniably horrid in his treatment of Anna”.
In April, Hillsong College sent an email to students who had started a petition to air their discontent with how Hillsong handled the Crenshaw allegations. Some had known the American student during her time at the campus in north-west Sydney.
The email, obtained by Inq, includes a list of promised Hillsong actions:
“First, we are listening to you as a student body, and we hear your concerns loud and clear. We also understand that listening is only an initial step. We are committed to additional tangible measures to address the concerns that have been raised about our reporting process and how to respond after a report is made.
“Second, we are committed to doing the right thing by the former student … Obviously, we have some areas that need to be addressed and improved.
“Third, we have initiated an independent and external review for how we have handled this case, including a review of our reinstatement of employment of Jason Mays.
“Fourth, we have been reviewing our formalised procedures and policies regarding serious and wilful misconduct (including sexual assault, sexual harassment and other crimes), with a view to strengthening these and ensuring they are appropriately applied at all times.”
Anna Crenshaw told Inq: “The email says that Hillsong has done the right thing in its dealings with me. Yet they have never apologised in any way.
“Their actions suggest to me that they are more interested in preserving its reputation than making perpetrators accountable.”
Despite her treatment at Hillsong, Crenshaw’s Christian faith remains unshaken.
“But they should understand that people of my generation think it’s OK for an organisation to come out and admit what has happened and then do something about it, rather than try to keep it covered up,” she said.
Hillsong has declined to answer our request for comment.
If you or someone you know is affected by sexual assault, domestic or family violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au
Hillsong! The founder was jailed ( Houston) and now they are trying to hide behind morals ?Yepp, any wonder they and Morrison are close as all are good at hypocrisy and dirty dealings.
His son is as bad as his father, as far as I’m concerned. He tried to pervert the course of justice, relating to his father’s crimes, then publicly tried to blame the victims for being sexually abused……and this is the spiritual advisor of the current Prime Minister. Let that sink in for a moment.
Apples…trees. This hillbilly ‘religion’ is all about fleecing the sheep.
Apart from the tax exemption for being a “church”, I wonder how long it will be before taxpayers’ money starts flowing to them, a’la $30M x2 to NewsCorpse’s FOX to show minority sport, for dubious projects, .eg school chaplains, charity & outreach… oh, not likely, the poor deserve their poverty.
Its been flowing for awhile now. hillsongchurchwatch.com › tag › hillsong-emerge
Funny how religion and sex crimes go together. And war. Heaven must be quite a place.
They have gone together for a very long time. Possibly ever since modern religions were invented. Things might change if some of those who have concealed sex crimes against children were tried and imprisoned for their sins
Ask George Pell @ sex crimes and religion, funny that he allowed to leave the country!
Once religion was ALL about sex – joyous, unrestrained and the norm, eg Ishtar/Astarte or the temples of Khajuraho temples of Madhya Pradesh.
Then came the patriarchal monotheists and Darkness Visible.
This ‘god’ seems to be a bully & a thug. Hope he doesn’t materialise anywhere on this planet.
And an impregnator of underage virgins – Luke 1.34
“Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man? And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee.”
Sounds like sexual assault to me.
After ‘knowing’ Mary without her consent, God then decided to have his son killed …. so bizarre
It obviously doesn’t have to make sense to work its magic.
Unless you have been in a cult like church I don’t think you can truly understand the implications of it. These places are not like the local Catholic or Protestant Church. They are not benign. They don’t do anything good for the community except try and convert people to fall under their control so they have money and power. Except they don’t even know this. They actually believe they are doing ‘good’. They actually believe they are on a ‘higher plane’ and living in a ‘spiritual warfare’.
The fact our PM is in one is very scary to me because it means he has a very strong unspoken agenda. It explains his willingness to lie. It explains his smugness: because if you believe you are doing “God’s work” and are in ‘spiritual warfare’ then anything is justified. Anything. Because all is fair in war.
And war does not make you a moral person. Quite the opposite.
** when I say ‘benign’ (about Catholic and Protestant) I’m talking about inside the psyche of the congregation. I’m talking about the power of the Church over the words and actions of the adherents. The followers don’t just walk in on a Sunday for a meeting and then leave, forgetting about it until the next week. The Church doctrine and beliefs and control follows them all week and into every aspect of their lives.
I am NOT talking about all of the sexual abuse the leaders from all of the churches are all apparently willing to forgive and hide (which boggles my mind, because many of these churches will evict you for being an adulterer! Look at Hillsong’s reaction to that Pastor of their church in LA… he commits adultery and they throw him out. For some reason sexual abuse and paedophilia are forgivable, but adultery is not).
A blend of righteousness, sanctimony & commercial interest forms an unpalatable taste.
The” Money Lenders” ,now own the Temple.!
If you are referring to the N/T tale of ”cleansing of the Temple” they were money changers, not lenders – John 2:13-16, Matthew 21:12 & Mark 11:15-18.
They changed money into tokens or animals for sacrifice.
True to scripture, Hillsong takes real money and turns it into hot air.
Negative geared and making a motza!
They own all the temples but their favourites are those off shore temples in the Caribbean.
They bought it fair and square!
That sounds like an apt description of this government.
Umm, anyone else see a similarity between Houston’s twitter apology above: After suggesting that the victim was abused in her father’s church in Pennsylvania, and rather than Australia – Quote: Houston later deleted the tweet and apologised for having “foolishly included information that was wrong for me to share”.
… and Morrison’s Facebook apology in late March:
Quote: “In the course of today’s media conference when responding to further questions I deeply regret my insensitive response to a question from a News Ltd journalist by making an anonymous reference to an incident at News Ltd that has been rejected by the company. I accept their account. I was wrong to raise it. The emotion of the moment is no excuse. I especially wish to apologise to the individual at the centre of the incident and others directly impacted. I had no right to raise this issue and especially without their permission.“
The latter bothered me from the time it was published (I was not familiar with Houston’s until now). Morrison claims that he accepts News Limited’s claim that the incident never happened, and then goes on to apologise to the person at the centre of the incident for raising it without their permission – whom, by the first half of the post, wouldn’t actually exist. The similarity in the method of attempting to undermine who you are “apologising” to seems oddly stark to me. Almost looks like a playbook move, but I guess these two friends making such similar “apologies” is just a bizarre coincidence.
The non-apology apology playbook. It does seem strangely coincidental and yes, Morrison’s effort was bizarre, internally inconsistent and just weird.
That us Morrisons usual theme. He is a master of illusion and souble speak
double speak*