After months mired in historical rape allegations, Christian Porter is trying to focus on the fight for his political survival. To do so, the senior Coalition minister is spending more money on social media advertising than any other Australian politician.
Since Porter outed himself as the subject of a letter sent to the prime minister and other MPs accusing him of sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl in 1988 — allegations he strenuously denies — attention on him has been through the lens of the accusations.
The sudden end to Porter’s defamation action against the ABC, and NSW Police ruling out reopening the case, means this could be the end of formal proceedings — unless an inquiry into the allegations is called.
But Porter’s not out of the woods yet. His hold on the seat of Pearce is looking less than certain. The once blue-ribbon Liberal seat is set to be redistricted in August, removing many of the traditionally conservative rural voting areas. The ABC’s Antony Green expects this cuts about 2.5% off Porter’s 7.5% margin.
Faced with a reduced margin and months of negative media attention, Porter’s use of social media reveals how he is using digital tools to try win his seat.
Porter has regularly used Facebook advertising to promote Facebook and Instagram posts about his ministerial portfolios and electorate matters. This advertising suddenly stopped on February 28, two days after the letter’s existence was reported.
After a three-month break, just before he entered into mediation with the ABC over the defamation case, the minister’s Facebook began running more than a dozen advertisements.
Last week he was Australia’s eighth largest spender on Facebook ads about social issues, elections or politics. He spent $8627 between March 26 and June 1, more than any other Australian politician or political party. This weekly spend is a third of his total spend on Facebook advertising since it began being recorded in August 2020. Unlike other government ministers advertising on Facebook, each one of Porter’s advertisements were targeted to Western Australian Facebook users — many specifically mention Pearce or policies specific to it.
All but one of the promoted posts don’t feature Porter all. (The sole post depicting him was by far his most promoted, with half the money spent on a video on May 28 featuring him talking about Australian Made Week and his electorate. It cost somewhere between $3500 and $4000 to show the video to more than 90,000 people in WA.
(By comparison, Assistant Minister for Defence Andrew Hastie has spent more than $5000 in the past week but much of that is on ads targeting users all over Australia and many are about his portfolio. Many of the posts include Hastie.)
This same trend has continued over to Porter’s organic Facebook and Instagram posts. His accounts didn’t post during March, after he took mental health leave on March 3. Since then posts to his Facebook account slowly began to trickle back in and only returned to pre-accusation levels towards the end of May. His Facebook posts didn’t include a picture of Porter until nearly two months after his press conference outing himself as the minister at the centre of the scandal.
What this shows is that after going to ground, Porter is back with a near singular focus: convincing West Australian voters to vote him back in. And he’s willing to spend like he’s never spent before to change the topic away from allegations that — despite the end of formal proceedings — still haunt him.
If we’re still in his electorate, we’ll be actively campaigning against him……
Good luck! Sadly there will still be many that vote for him I’m afraid…:-(
This is Australia, not the US: seats are redistributed, they are not “redistricted”.
Thanks – why don’t these constant amerikanizms go klang for the writers as they clearly do for readers?
The thing is is going forward I will be with you momentarily to correct my bad.
Get a home run off of the plate.
Guess he doesn’t want to miss that undeserved salary plus perks.
Or at very the very worst he wants to make sure he gets the $150,000 golden parachute
I’d like a bit of investigative journalism into how much Porter’s costs were.
Something fishy about this costing the ABC 780,000 and no mention of his costs.
This is a sham and why did the ABC even consider paying his 100,000 in legals!
He’s such a public minded citizen. Really cares about wasting taxpayers money. A few Pfizer doses there surely. Was it true that he asked for public funding for his legals?
Why is this ‘fishy’ ? The ABC MD was asked about ABC costs, and answered. It’s not for him to discuss Porter’s costs.
And I wasn’t stating that. I said why wasn’t Porter’s cost made available to the public.
The ABC fessed up. Not a word from Porter, only that he’d won the battle. Crap!
We suppose Porter is paying his own costs, unless some kind soul bent on bringing down the ABC, came to his aid.
Justice Thawley ordered Mr Porter and his lawyer Sue Chrysanthou to pay for Ms Dyer’s legal costs. So why did Porter try twice to settle his defamation suit against Aunty, what exactly came to light to frighten him off if he was innocent as claimed??
I would like to see Crikey pursue that question !
I never had a lot of time for Julie Bishop. But she was very skilful in managing to keep Porter out of succeeding her in to what was a much safer seat. If only he’d supported her rather than Morrison …..
I wonder why ?
Julie has her own skeletons to worry about in regard to Greensill’s collapse.