On Monday, two of the most blustering forces in Australian politics combined to contest the next federal election. Former Liberal MP Craig Kelly announced that he was joining Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party as its parliamentary leader. The party, the pair said, would contest every seat in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
It’s a match made in heaven — if your idea of heaven is two loudmouthed buffoons who have spent the pandemic undermining Australians’ belief in the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and spruiking unproved or disproved treatments.
Politically there’s not much to suggest that their union will be anything but a political fizzer. Regardless of whether Palmer’s spend sank Labor in the 2019 election, the mining magnate’s unprecedented $80 million election spend was unable to achieve its primary goal of electing even a single candidate.
Kelly’s electoral future is dim, too. His seat of Hughes has gone back and forth between the two major parties since it was established in 1955, but has been held by the Liberal Party since 1996. That combined with an organised grassroots campaign to elect an independent other than Kelly makes his reelection a tall order.
Where the pair is more likely to be effective is in encouraging people to take action that puts them in danger during a pandemic.
Kelly posted that Palmer had pledged to spend $60 million to support the party’s campaign: “We have a huge war chest, we can run television commercials, ads, we can finance a proper campaign that no other minor party or independent can.”
This war chest will promote the party’s policies in the homes of millions of Australians. The main messages? Opposing lockdowns and and promoting vaccine scepticism.
Also on Monday, Australia’s medical regulator the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reported it had detected rising levels of importing and prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID, an unproved treatment favoured by anti-vaxxers.
“The TGA strongly discourages self-medication and self-dosing with Ivermectin for COVID-19 as it may be dangerous to your health. There is insufficient evidence to validate the use of Ivermectin in patients with COVID-19,” it said.
State health departments in the United States have warned they had noticed rising numbers of hospitalisation from people poisoning themselves with ivermectin. The medical regulator, the Food and Drugs Administration, put out a similar warning.
The use of this unproved and dangerous treatment is linked to Kelly, who has been promoting it non-stop on social media and in Parliament. Palmer promoted hydroxychloroquine (also beloved by Kelly) and donated millions of doses to the Australian government.
The two have a track record to telling people to use experimental treatments, putting themselves and others at risk.
The legacy of the pairing of Kelly and Palmer is unlikely to be one of political success. It’s more likely to be remembered as an expensive effort to convince Australians to put themselves at risk, rather than trusting the tools that have been proved to keep them safe.
“the mining magnate’s unprecedented $80 million election spend was unable to achieve its primary goal of electing even a single candidate” The primary goal was only ever to help defeat Labor – that’s pretty much universally understood now.
Was going to say the same. I don’t think it was ever his intention to get in, just to muddy the waters and spend up big on Facebook peddling lies about death taxes. He succeeded.
And how many more advertising $$$ will Murdoch harvest from this bizarre coupling…
Agree, and this aspect is skirted round by much media understanding they are gamed by, or actually promote, these nominally independent independent parties and candidates, who eventually support and/or wedge the LNP.
agree
C’mon, call it for what it is. If Kelly runs for Hughes and loses he gets a great big $150,000 cheque from the government as his “resettlement allowance” As the endorsed candidate of a registered party he doesn’t have to go through all that palaver of finding 100 friends to endorse his nomination, Craig might be worried he’ll struggle here. And he doesn’t even then have to pay for a (loosing) campaign, Clive will pick up the tab. And then after the election, bank the $150k and it’s off to a gig on Sky AfterDark. Win-Win-Win for Craig.
“resettlement allowance” is an odd term, since MPs receive a “living away from home allowance” whenever they are in Canberra, even if they are in a house that they own. Presumably they will need the money to resettle in the house that they already live in?
On Clive’s form with picking winners, Craig’s probably not long for this (political) world.
Tasmania did get Jacqui Lambie thanks to Clive. She’s a better pick than some of Morrison’s mates.
Naive comment Cam. Palmer’s primary goal was exactly what be achieved – stop Labor from winning. The primary goal will be the same this time. Stop Labor and elect the friendlies. Clive is clever vas well as wealthy.
We need to be very careful here. Palmer’s involvement in the last Federal Election, allowed enough preferences to leak, to give Morrison government.
This time around, if elected Kelly may very well hold the balance of power, in which case what does Morrison offer him?.
The offers will be there.
A bespoke tinfoil hat.
Palmer had next to no influence in the Queensland State election and hopefully the same will apply nationally.