As the Pfizer vaccine rollout extends to younger age brackets and many holdouts finally come forward for a jab, the under-40s who had already received AstraZeneca are sitting on their high horses.
A subtle sense of perceived moral superiority can be seen among those who signed up for the out-of-favour vax counter to health advice. You could even say AZ is trendy among young people.
How does a vaccine become cool? Like most things in life, when you tell someone not to do something they’ll want to do it more. If you tell someone a behaviour is risky, they’ll want to prove they’re not afraid.
Getting AZ carries with it a number of subtle, but desirable, messages. The recipient is highly rational and able to assess risks without succumbing to fear mongering. They’re happy to accept risk and even go against official health advice. Essentially they’re bold, independent thinkers — and a little edgy. And, finally, they care about the public good and doing their bit. This selflessness permits them a “humble brag” on social media in the name of spreading messages of vaccine confidence.
This newfound status is a rather humorous pivot, given that not so long ago the name AstraZeneca equalled blood clots and death. Even once the minuscule risks were explained and contextualised, the older generation still wasn’t biting, and it looked like the AZ campaign was tainted beyond recovery.
But when under-40s were given the go-ahead to request the AZ from their GPs, counter to the government’s vaccine advisory group ATAGI’s advice at the time, a new wave of youth-driven AZ support was born. The “vaxxie” took off in Australia, with young journos on Twitter being among the first to share selfies receiving the AZ jab.
And soon enough the AZ bandwagon gained a sense of moral authority; its ample supply made it the more ethical choice, and the vaccine that was once shunned was now the subject of bragging rights for its recipients. The 20-somethings who managed to get their hands on Pfizer were soon looked at with thinly veiled disdain — they’d taken the easy route. I’ve heard someone describe a Pfizer recipient as “too chicken” to get AZ.
This all sounds rather negative, but I’ll confess I am one of the young ’uns who got their first shot of AZ in July and, yes, I did post about it on Instagram.
I think it’s the right thing to do, but I have to acknowledge that this perceived trendiness may have encouraged my decision. When I told a friend I was writing this article, he agreed the trend was real. He even changed his Facebook display picture to tell the world he had taken the plunge with the AZ.
There’s no such thing as a selfless good deed, but if this unlikely trend is what it took to get uptake of the AZ vaccine, then so be it. Whatever gets the job done.
As for how the vaccine that is most commonly accepted across the globe became a “fringe” vaccine in Australia is a question for ATAGI, government officials and the media, but I suspect that “I got the AZ” will be a statement that holds some weight for at least a few years.
Good to see it’s being more accepted. What a shame it was so politicised, delaying the initial uptake.
The younger brigade showing a very entitled older age group how to be community minded, it’s so cool. Glad you brought up the ethical side of this. Those over 50 (and subsequently 60) who were ‘holding out for the better vaccine’ were taking a highly unethical stand given that the risk to them was much lower than for younger people, (half!) and the younger people weren’t allowed to have a vaccine.
And not at all surprisingly there are also side effects with Pfizer, which were publicised but somehow that risk was different (not really) and the final cherry on all this is that current studies are showing that Pfizer’s efficacy drops quite a bit more quickly than AZ, with AZ being more efficacious after about 3.5 months.
Cheers Josefine, both my 20 something kids have got AZ, and we and they are glad about it. Picnics, how quaint, for this family, will be allowed in a couple of weeks.
I’m not sure how you can describe the over 60s as “very entitled” in a vaccination sense when that age group was the one given no choice but to take AZ, or nothing.
I should note that I, at almost 65 years of age have had the AZ jab and I am not criticising the vaccine itself. My preparedness to do so was not helped however by watching Dear Leader Sooty and his sycophantic health minister Hunt, both right in the middle of the AZ only age group at that time, both lead the way by taking a Pfizer shot. Now that’s entitled, and such great optics from the perspective of setting an example for the rest of us…
Being 66, the only vaccine I was offered was the AstraZeneca one, but I think it’s an excellent vaccine. I had the second dose 2 1/2 weeks ago, and I was pleased to have had it.
And no side effects too.
I am 69 years old.
I have had my two jabs of this vaccine.
Slight side effects after the first jab, none after the second jab.
No side effects.
I got the AZ. Twice now, once when I was 59 and the second when I was 60. Felt like shit on a stick for 36 hours after the first jab. After the second 10 days later developed a nasty little thing called benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Move my head to the left, the world spins, fall to the floor, try not to puke. Occurs in the population all the time, usually only lasts 6 weeks or so but is oft very unpleasant, and may be related to viral infections, so the AZ may be the cause. Several GPs I know have seen a spike in cases following vaccination.
You’re not “infected” after receiving AZ. The adenovirus carrier which has had the SARS CoV-2 spike protein inserted into its genes is unable to replicate. What happens is an immune response to that protein. Some benign headaches ( easily treated with paracetamol) have been experienced afterwards. BPV is possible, but temporary. TTS is the worst outcome but mercifully rare. Most people recover from these (relatively) minor effects within 3 days.
Pfizer has been observed to cause mild pericarditis/ myocarditis in some young men, usually relieved with ibuprofen ( an anti-inflammatory). No-one is maintaining side-effects do not occur. However, serious adverse effects requiring hospitalisation are definitely rare.
Young people being brave because it’s cool/edgy/whatever make me proud. All of my family in these age brackets and older who can be vaccinated with either not the kids yet, though so far) have done so with minor inconvenience. We’re feeling pretty confident about rejoining the world when we can.
Likewise, I had my first dose back in May as soon as I could – over 50’s at the time could only get AZ. (I like travelling too!) And my son and his girlfriend (both 18) are a couple of weeks away from their second dose of AZ. Interestingly, when I took my Dad (90 in December) for his first jab in early June (that was how long the queue was to be vaccinated at the Warringah Medical Centre – safe Liberal seat so I guess there was no hurry) the Covid nurse and Covid doctor at the GP recommended he wait for the alternatives to AZ. Because of the bad publicity around AZ he went with their recommendation. And then the lockdown. I rang around everywhere trying to get him an alternative but in the answer was always the same – no one had authorisation to give Pfizer to over-60’s. He’s now had his first AZ – the alternate medical centre we took him too couldn’t believe he’d been advised otherwise – and apart from tiredness he’s had no side-effects. Can’t help wondering if the problems stem from the source – perhaps Oxford University just wasn’t as clever at marketing their vaccine compared to Big Pharma? But the big question for us AZ’ers – how free will we really be if the rest of the world doesn’t recognise our AZ due to CSL not being licensed properly?
Astra Zeneca is as much Big Pharma as Pfizer but it is selling its vaccine at cost and I believe it has waived royalties in some cases. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/28/astrazeneca-vaccine-deserves-celebration-not-scorn. This has not endeared it to the competition and particularly the billionaire factory at Pfizer HQ which was funded by the US taxpayer to develop their product and is now drowning in rivers of gold selling it at full tote odds. Recent comparative studies of adverse reactions at population level e.g. 1.3mio people in Catalonia, 27mio in the UK, suggest the Pfizer mRNA has as many issues as the AZ product, i.e. not many and certainly not serious enough in either case to be “product killers” in the vaccine world.
I might be connecting too many dots here but our LNP government is still resisting the UN proposal to WIPO to temporarily suspend the IP Rights regime to allow generic manufacturing until the pandemic is under control. Pfizer also opposes any relaxation of IPR. This begs the question, was someone pulling strings when our PM and health minister “acting on medical advice” trashed AZ at a late night press conference? Perhaps they weren’t as clumsy as I first thought?