One of the small number of genuinely independent public sector bodies in the federal government, Infrastructure Australia (IA), has released its 2021 Australian Infrastructure Plan, which contains a number of implied rebukes for the Morrison government’s failure of leadership on energy and climate policy.
IA has declined to “reinvent the wheel” and make specific infrastructure recommendations around electricity networks, preferring to offer a “non-build plan of policy reforms”. But it repeatedly calls for more leadership from the government, which has dedicated its energy efforts solely to supporting its fossil fuel donors.
IA calls out a lack of leadership from the government across a wide range of infrastructure issues, repeating its previous arguments that “Australia could lead the world in developing and applying approaches to infrastructure that enhance sustainability” but needs a government willing to take a “leadership position”.
“If Australia is to enjoy the full benefits of industrialisation, there will need to be government leadership.”
But it is in energy that leadership is called for most often. “Australia needs national leadership to ensure a secure future by positioning this country for the inevitable low-emission energy transition.” “National leadership is needed to ensure Australia remains a supplier of choice for energy commodities.” “There needs to be strong national leadership and planning to coordinate efforts.” “This is a time for decisive national action that secures Australia’s future by harnessing its low-cost, low-emission energy potential.”
In particular IA rejects the narrative from the government, elements within Labor and the union movement, and fossil fuel interests, that the switch to renewables means job losses. “Every million dollars spent on renewable energy creates three times more jobs than the same spending on fossil fuels,” IA says. The energy chapter repeatedly identifies the need to address the lack of investor certainty, recommending efforts to “increase investor certainty and enable emerging industries by developing clear, outcome-focused legislation and regulation for emerging low-emission energy technology”.
It also says energy efficiency opportunities are going begging, noting that Australia’s residential sector remains as energy intensive now as it was two decades ago, while some countries have seen falls of up to 30%. Our manufacturing energy intensity has only declined by a small amount compared to countries like the US, South Korea and Japan, which have achieved energy intensity reductions of 40% and more.
Noticeably, IA fails to endorse physical reliability obligations like “CoalKeeper” being pushed by Angus Taylor in order to funnel subsidies to fossil fuel companies in the name of reliability. Instead, IA recommends Australia “maintain electricity market reliability by developing and implementing a trigger-based electricity market review mechanism that is undertaken at key policy trigger points such as announcement of accelerated retirement of thermal electricity generators.”
“The energy transition is a big opportunity for Australia,” IA says. “It has world-leading renewable resources, such as solar and wind, that can service both the economy and trading partners. Australia can remain a global energy supplier of choice by pivoting from fossil fuels to low emission supply chains.”
But not, it makes clear, with a government that refuses to lead on energy other than to reward its donors.
We should react with deep suspicion when we read someone spruiking “low emissions technology”. They have avoided conforming to the modern requirement of “zero emissions”, but instead have used the term which is used by the gas industry. When we read the term, “transition”, we should read it as an intention to transit from coal to gas. It is foolish to make a distinction between 100% gas and 100% renewables backed up by gas, because the emissions are similar. Instead, we must progress towards zero emissions and the extinction of the gas industry in this country.
You’ve nailed it.
” It is foolish to make a distinction between 100% gas and 100% renewables backed up by gas, because the emissions are similar.”
Are they?
Gas plants emit as much CO2 when idle for 90%+ of the time as they do when they operate 100% of the time?
Change of govt will be the only way to move forward on this. Morrison will pay some lip service for political cover, but it will be meaningless….
Do we think anyone in government will actually read this report? Let alone be moved to change their approach? No? Thought not. Just like they won’t have read the piece on the ABC website this week about Spain’s pivot from coal to renewables. Spain is paying miners being laid off as mines close $3,700 a month for life. This simple plan means people are supported and have choices. They can choose to stay in the area they have always lived, if they wish. Or they can get a completely different job and still get the money. Brilliant. Simple. Beyond Australia’s politicians to imagine such a thing.
I wonder if the narrative on what form of fuel powered Australia switched from “fossil fuels vs green fuels”, to “imported fuels vs Australian fuels”, we might see a change in narrative. Australia is not capable of supplying sufficient oil feedstock for petrol and diesel to meet its needs, and short of using Fischer-Tropsch / Syngas with coal and natural gas to power our fleet (both very expensive), the alternative of green electricity and green hydrogen would be much more attractive.
Electric and hydrogen fuels are the patriotic way forward.
Our reliance on petroleum imports, usually we have about 2 weeks supply in the country at any one point, is a huge strategic problem. We could be cut off from the world and our accepted way of life by a nation blockading fuel delivery. Sure, not easy, but it’s so dumb. Further, import of fuels means export of dollars, again, dumb, although I’m sure this government doesn’t care as it is all money for fossil fuel companies.
Australia running its homes and cars on renewables, hydro, pumped hydro, hydrogen and batteries, all within our borders, solves a few serious problems for the nation quite apart from the obvious benefits in carbon emissions.
Surely we will look back at this time as the period of Peak Dumb. I hope so, otherwise we are doomed, literally.
Especially now that solid state hydrogen delivery is becoming a reality.
3X the jobs. ALP take note.