Grading criteria
A: All the requirements for the subject have been met to a highly satisfactory degree
B: Subject requirements have been met satisfactorily
C: The student is performing to a competent degree but has areas for improvement
D: The subject requirements have not been met fully
F: Subject requirements have not been met at all
Name: Annastacia Palaszczuk
Subject | Comment | Grade |
---|---|---|
Borders | Annastacia has proven an enthusiastic, though at times clumsy, student in this area. She has been distracted by her being seated next to Ms Berejiklian, something we’re unable to do anything about at this point. Needs to understand that not everything is a “yes or no” question. | B |
Quarantine | In what has been a disappointing year across the board, Annastacia has belatedly shown some initiative on this subject. Whether she can deliver any results, however, remains to be seen; we have learnt that prefects’ promises cannot always be relied on. | C |
Vaccinations | Very disappointing — Annastacia ends the term at the bottom of the class. Has she been resting on her laurels? Will need some late nights and lunchtimes in the library to make up the distance. | D |
Economics | Trailing the top of the class but a solid performer, mainly thanks to lots of burning the midnight oil, or at least coal. Maybe to make up for all that time lying in the sun. | B |
Leadership | Annastacia’s approach to leadership could be best described perhaps as “draconian”, and she can be influenced by what the school newspaper reports, but nonetheless she remains a popular prefect among her cohort, if not necessarily with other members of the school leadership. Like some other members of the school’s Young Labor Society, she’s prone to spats with the school captain, but there is plenty of blame on both sides for such unbecoming behaviour. | B |
Conduct | Annastacia is adept at presenting a respectable image. We hope this reflects reality; the school has been disappointed by other prefects whose image was found to be somewhat inconsistent with their behaviour behind closed doors. | B |
I can’t work out where these ratings come from. The worst you could say about vaccines is “relied on the school prefect to keep up his end of the bargain, but instead he gave her vaccines to someone else.” We’re still pretty shirty up here in Qld about all our vaccines being taken and Feds not meeting their responsibility for GP delivery.
No one up here thinks her leadership is draconian. The people who say it are just saying it so they can get on the news.
But I know: Crikey is a Sydney/Melbourne thing and the rest of us should just be honoured to be collateral damage.
I’m from Sydney Jimbo and my impressions on BKs ratings are the same as yours. How can you rate her a D on vaccinations when they haven’t been given the damn things to put in people’s arms. How can she score a C on quarantine when she appears to be the only Premier who had a plan, which was kyboshed by ScoMo because he didn’t think of it. They had a dozen page assessment for Toowoomba, Scomo came up with less than a page of dot points months later to deflect criticism. I hope you QLDers understand how you have been dudded by the Federal Government.
Draconian leadership. Jaysus, hyperbole? Draco would be quite displeased. She’s protected Qld’ers unashamedly. I was not surprised to find that Qld’ers were quite happy about that.
Even my conservative friends don’t criticise Palaszczuk. She shows strength & doesn’t allow the Canberra Boys’ Club to rattle her. Nor does she give a toss what score other states award her.
I thought a solid B!
There, just got rid of the minus 1s for you Beth, and zut and Wayne. Cheers.
Shouldn’t the overall grade be a C+ or B-?
SOLID B. Vaccinations unfairly scored. Middle of the class on delivery “B”. School Captain accused of “preferential treatment” with supply
Wow, Bernard, it seems you deliberately mark Coalition Leaders Up, even in areas they don’t deserve it, whilst consistently marking down Labor Leaders. You really have nailed your colours to the mast with these “report cards”, haven’t you?