What to make of CFMMEU officials, led by pantomime villain and alleged domestic violence perpetrator John Setka, being bombarded and attacked by disgruntled tradies, right-wing extremists and anti-vaxxers in Melbourne yesterday — when the CFMMEU opposes mandatory vaccination?
Further illustration that the anti-vax/far-right coalition that has emerged in recent months is both prone to violence — animals seem a particular target, for some reason — and that they’ll never let facts get in the way of a conspiracy theory. Despite the CFMMEU being a significant impediment to vaccination in the construction industry, Setka is apparently “Daniel Andrews’ bitch”. The protest was reminiscent of British anti-vaxxers violently attacking a former BBC building in London, oblivious to the fact that the Beeb hadn’t been there in years. Facts are not the strong suit of this crowd.
Andrews has done what Gladys Berejiklian rightly did in NSW, despite opposition from religious extremist MPs in her own ranks, and mandated vaccination in construction amid widespread non-compliance with public health requirements in the Victorian sector.
He also followed her example in shutting down construction given the levels of non-compliance with health orders in the sector and the need to enforce vaccination.
It’s also what Prime Minister Scott Morrison has ostentatiously refused to do — show leadership on the vexed issue of how far vaccination should be mandated in workplaces. He is too scared to offend extremists in his own ranks.
In contrast, ACTU secretary Sally McManus spoke of an attempt by the far right and anti-vaxxers to intimidate unions and pledged support for the vaccine mandate in construction and the shutdown.
Her position — articulated clearly and effectively — demonstrates how ideologically scrambled public health resistance has become. The anti-vax movement, if initially more left wing, has become increasingly a combination of far left and far right over the past two decades, now joined by ideologically incoherent “freedom” supporters, religious zealots, opportunistic fascist groups and conspiracy theorists always ready to see the dark hand of the New World Order behind every public health measure. There’s no left or right in this sordid mix, any more than there’s top or bottom.
And on the other side are business groups that want to get back to making money as quickly as possible even if plenty of people die, unions that have an interest in keeping their members safe and their industries open, and governments that know the only path out of the pandemic is vaccination.
Such ideological confusions and currents among the resistance represents much larger economic and social forces at work, as Crikey has long argued. But there’s a tendency among some public health academics to soft-pedal the extremism of such groups and urge a kind of compassionate understanding of vaccine hesitancy and denialism, insisting that they won’t be won over by being lectured and abused.
The attacks on the CFMMEU — to repeat, a union that opposes the vaccination mandate — illustrate that dialogue or engagement with such groups is pointless. These are people who have gone down a very deep rabbit hole. Businesses have a moral right to mandate vaccination for the protection of their employees and customers, even if the legal right may be contested.
Berejiklian and Andrews have backed them and pursued their own mandates. Morrison is too scared to do so. Another moment in the shift in real leadership and power from Canberra to the state capitals.
The thing that really gets me about the anti-vaxxers is their desire for ivermectin. Goes to show just how tribal even acceptance of facts is when a well-studied safe and effective treatment is considered dangerous and one that is unsafe and ineffective is seen as a legitimate alternative.
It’s sad that something as non-partisan as science can get caught up in hyper-partisan narratives. Scientifically-speaking, vaccines work and ivermectin doesn’t.
You’d better stop posting until you do a bit of research – although even reading this article will no doubt not enlighten you enough to stop with your ignorant BS . https://tinyurl.com/3fk576ct India State of 241 Million People Declared COVID-free after Government Promotes Ivermectin.
Thickies need to understand that the WHO & Govts in general will not back down. They have spent Billions on these experimental jabs -rushed out in less than a year & complete immunity from damages given to big Pharm. Ivermectin on the other hand costs under $10 for a complete round of treatment. Can’t have that muddying the waters !
(I went and looked at other articles on that site. It’s not peer-reviewed science. It looks like a bastion of conspiracy thinking, but that’s another issue.) Got an article from Nature / Lancet / British Medical Journal / New England Journal of Medicine / other peer review magazine on the topic? For instance, here’s one article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases that actually put ivermectin to the test: https://tinyurl.com/39mmur8n
I’d be more than happy for you showing me the science that shows it works as a treatment.
You keep using that word (experimental). I do not think it means what you think it means. Each vaccine had to undergo multiple trials that tested safety and efficacy. It’s gone through all the rigors of the scientific process that one would expect of a medicine. Unlike ivermectin. Again, happy for you to show me the science that says otherwise…
I like memes too:
DoWatchyour ownsomeone else’sresearchcrappy Youtube videoImagine a person so stupid they will repeat the “disease so deadly you have to be tested to know you have it” line… Tell that to the people NSW is letting die in their homes who only get tested after they’re dead – do you think they knew they had it as they gasped for their last breath?
Look at AIDS. Most people caught it months or years before they found out they had it from a medical test. But AIDS wasn’t deadly… Was it?
As others point out James, there is nothing experimental in the vaccines. They have gone through the most significant testing of all vaccines in history.
But that’s not what you mean, is it! You’re talking about mRNA vaccines, which are new. New is not a synonym for experimental but why argue semantics.
Just get the AZ vaccine. It uses traditional methodologies just like every one of those vaccines you’ve taken for the last 20 years.
But that’s not what you are arguing, is it James! It’s hard to work out exactly what your argument is though, all you come up with is memes from Facebook. AZ is a safe vaccine, and although it is rarely reported, aspiration of the needle before injecting may eliminate any chance of the 1 in 200,000 chance of developing a clot, or the 1 in a million chance of dying from a vaccine. Interestingly I noted as my wife and I got our second AZ dose, the doctor aspirated the needle. I don’t know how widespread that information is out there, but I’m seriously cross about them not consulting you first.
Noticed any headlines or recent cases of blood clots from vaccines in Australia. No, neither have I. Try a reputable source, not those tinyurl garbage clusters.
I say Sally McManus for Prime Minister!