Was Scott Morrison right to point the finger at the media when challenged about his handling of workplace and gender issues — only to identify the wrong outlet?
In a now notorious incident in March this year, the prime minister responded to questions from a News Corp journalist about the behaviour of his staff by falsely claiming that a harassment complaint had been made against a News Corp journalist. Morrison was forced to apologise for the remarks later that night.
While that false claim related to the News Corp press gallery bureau, Morrison may not have been entirely wrong to raise questions about the good faith status of those reporting on the Brittany Higgins sexual assault allegation, Morrison’s handling of it, or the Christian Porter scandal.
There is talk in the corridors of the press gallery that the Ten Network has been forced to conduct a review of the workplace culture of its gallery bureau. Crikey understands that several Ten staff have been interviewed as part of the review and that the results are currently with Ten management. What prompted the review is unknown, but the bureau has suffered high staff turnover in recent years.
Ten confirmed the review but sought to downplay it. A 10 ViacomCBS spokesperson told Crikey it “has been conducting internal reviews of culture and practices across various departments, including its Canberra bureau, in the ordinary course of its program of workplace improvements”.
The issue is particularly relevant given the fact that Ten has played a high-profile role in the coverage of the gender and workplace issues that roiled the government in the first half of the year — indeed, it was a key player. Ten’s role included:
- Brittany Higgins’ interview with Lisa Wilkinson on The Project in February this year after News Corp’s Sam Maiden broke the the story of Higgins’ rape allegations
- Wilkinson accompanying Higgins at the March4Justice rally in Canberra in March
- Political editor Peter van Onselen revealing that Morrison’s office had been backgrounding against Higgins’ partner
- Van Onselen publicly defending his friend Christian Porter against historical rape allegations that led to a series of misjudgments that cost Porter his ministry and may yet end his career.
In the absence of detail about the workplace review and what prompted it, questions remain over Ten’s coverage of the issue and whether it had its own workplace issues while playing such a key role in political events — and whether the prime minister had a fair point when he threw questions right back at journalists, even if his aim was astray. Ten claims “editorial policy and practice operates independently of its internal workplace”.
After the way gender and workplace issues have been handled this year, does that seem any more likely for a media company than for a government?
This is not a logical argument. Whether or not Ch10 has/had workplace issues of its own does not invalidate the actions of either Wilkinson or van Onselen as detailed above nor does it in any way invalidate the assertions, actions and evidence they sought to expose or present. These things stand and fall on their own merits irrespective of the state of the Ch 10 workplace culture.
The linkage through to PM Morrison’s ‘false claim’ regarding Newscorp staff is equally invalid and irrelevant. PM used that claim as a ‘you too’ deflection from the central questions asked of him. Whether the PM’s claim was right or wrong is not the issue because it is not germane to the central question asked of Morrison.
Exactly – this is how he works. He is a master of “whatabaoutism” or the “look over there”
He hasn’t an honest bone in his body
Nor a spine
Given his basic nature, if he had a spine he’d probably be even more dangerous
As with Trump, the world is lucky that he was so limited in his actions by his supreme incompetence – itself the natural result of his total narcissism.
Morrison doesn’t even rise to the level of overall incompetence being entirely transactional – sufficient to survive any single 24hr (minute? pace Warhol) news cycle.
Tomorrow is an unknown country.
Morrison’s “false claim” is relevant, because it exemplifies his propensity to use falsities whenever possible.
For those old enough to remember Stepto and son the PM reminds me of the sketch when the father looks to the heavens when he mentions his ex wife .His son chastises him and reminds him she ran off with a sailor.Why does the PM always look up when he needs to make a decision ? Who is making the decisions? Should we worry? Who is setting the standards? Will WHO be on the upcoming election ballot papers
No, the PM is not allowed to do a “whataboutism”.
Isn’t it about holding up high standards in parliament?
In every workplace.
Morrison mixed his leakers?