If, as several figures including US President Joe Biden have noted, Colin Powell embodied the American dream, it’s true in a far richer sense than the details of his biography.
The son of Jamaican immigrants who grew in Harlem, he rose to the highest ranks of the US military and became chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, then near to the top of US politics — all American dream stuff, assuredly.
But if Powell’s rise to prominence via the extraordinary killing power of the US military reflects the less PR-friendly and military fetishistic dimension of the American dream, his political fate perfectly illustrates how America, and particularly the Republicans, lost their way. That he ended up dying as a result of complications from a plague that Donald Trump helped flourish across the US is a bitter coda to the way he, and the American dream, both became detached from the grim truth of 21st century America.
Powell flirted with running for the Republican presidential nomination ahead of 1996 — when Bill Clinton steamrolled an elderly Bob Dole — and 2000. His aim was for the Republicans to once again become the “party of Lincoln”, he told Kerry O’Brien on Lateline in 1995.
Black, moderate, pro-choice, Powell harkened back to an earlier era of the GOP — though the party of Lincoln was always out of the question. He could perhaps, in an ideal world, have managed the party of Nixon — the Republicans before Reagan and the evangelical takeover, led then by a man whose profound personality flaws masked a highly progressive presidency.
But Powell lacked a passion for politics, he declared. And in any event, the GOP was already on the turn away from any moderation. Clinton unleashed something feral within Republicanism, a seething hatred that embraced any means to destroy him. The genial public service of the elder George Bush was no longer enough; Clinton and the Democrats became an unholy, existential threat to be fought any way possible.
The arrival of Fox News in the 1990s helped accelerate the radicalisation of Republicans; the blatant theft of the 2000 election by George W Bush a necessary act to prevent another Democratic president. Powell had endorsed Bush fils and signed up to be his secretary of state, perhaps expecting an easy continuation of the post-Cold War peace that had characterised Clinton’s years.
Instead he got 9/11, the Afghanistan War and the lie about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. It was Powell’s credibility that sold the lie to the world. If the adult in the room at the White House, if the “reluctant warrior” believed, surely it must be true.
A “blot on my record” Powell would later generously admit — though he never resiled from his support for the invasion.
Bush kicked him out of the administration after winning in 2004, before the last years of Dubya turned into a litany of disasters culminating in the global financial crisis. Neither Powell nor Bush realised it, but the radical turn in the GOP hadn’t finished, and both would fall victim. Sarah Palin’s nomination as John McCain’s vice-presidential pick might have alerted them, but by then it was too late.
The once-potent isolationist strand of Republicanism re-emerged from long dormancy. Iraq became a national nightmare that America should never have entered; Bush and his extravagant, war-mongering ways was denounced. And Barack Obama unleashed a profound racism that morphed from Tea Party anti-government hostility into birtherism — the original political lie of Trump.
In Trump’s hands, the party of Lincoln became, quite literally, the party of the KKK. “Fine people on both sides,” Trump declared of white supremacists and those who objected to them, while making statements about military policy that hadn’t been heard from an elected Republican since the 1930s: that foreign military ventures only benefited arms companies, who encouraged conflict.
Trump made it inconceivable that Powell could ever have been a Republican president, just as he has made Bush Jr look unthreatening and amiable in retrospect. And names like Bush and Cheney — Republican royalty — became epithets.
And when it came Trump’s turn to try to steal an election, there was no Supreme Court challenge, no top team led by Republican grandees like James Baker, no careful parsing of Florida law. There were carpark press conferences, a farting Rudy Giuliani and the incitement of an insurrection aimed at overthrowing and even murdering members of Congress as they performed what used to be a minor piece of democratic theatre.
If Powell is a road not taken by the Republicans, it’s one long since lost from view in a party deep in a violent, racist authoritarian obsession.
I remember that UN speech as clear as yesterday. Sat there watching it on TV, with two computers open, line-by-line net-searching material rebuttals of Powell’s manifestly ridiculous shopping list of patently horsesh*t ‘threats’, in real time. An on-the-spot Observer article by a reporter in a northern Iraq village, filed about two days before Powell proclaimed it as a ‘gas factory site’, is one of many surreal moments that sticks in the mind. The moment where what you are seeing on TV – from probably the most materially-powerful podium in the world at that moment, no less – is exposed as pure invention; pure propaganda; pure lie. Genuinely subversive, that shock of recognition. It’s coming from our side.
And from one of the ‘good guys’ of our side. The audacity of it was stunning. Because you knew instantly it was going to work.
That speech was the invention of Fake News and the global professional media has to this day never once admitted to the catastrophic magnitude of its terminal failure, to properly call out the litany of lies it contained. Easily seen lies. Obvious lies. Indisputable lies, of checkable material fact. As simple as intern-level fact-checking can get, in fact. That speech was so obviously and so easily editorially assessable as…complete f**king bullsh*t. And from such an expose – the need of the CotW to b/s the entire ‘case for war’ so clumsily, at and to the UN, FFS – could and should have flown the scrutinised-to-exposed-to-imploded collapse of the whole Bush Admin/PNAC con. Genuinely stolen-election roots, and all.
Global Meeja said zip. By-and-large, the global free media squibbed that lying speech. Fudged it. Dodged it. Spun it. Ramped it. And not just Murdoch. Too pat to blame Rupert alone. Judith Miller was the darling of the NY Times, FFS.
That’s really the wrong turn in the democratic road, BK: your profession’s failure to savage that speech as the total pile of cr*p it so obviously was. The global ‘professional’ media’s overwhelming duplicity in – its wilful collusion in – the western democratic world’s cowardly acquiescence before that lying, lying, lying speech. It’s the day I stopped trusting or believing mainstream journalists, as a default position (until sure of reasons to do so, byline case by case). That start-point mistrust of mainstream journalism won’t change, until mainstream journalism – and especially specific journalists still around, who were all there to watch that speech, and knowingly failed to do their job – offer up a mea culpa.
In other news, a former US general and Sec of State died. RIP, & condolences to his loved ones.
Why hasn’t anyone mentioned the Rodent for his part in this sordid drama?
Provincial bit player, who like Powell had his chance to make big history, and squibbed it.
The Rodent’s part in the invasion of Iraq was crucial; remember he was in the USA on 9 September 2001 to get a Free Trade Agreement with the Yanks, so the Bushies made it pretty clear that the price for his FTA would be signing up to Iraqw no questions asked … oh, and put some squadrons of those Australian SAS in the Iraqi desert five weeks before the invasion so they could find and destroy Saddam’s secret Scud missile batteries that were aimed towards Israel.
The rest is history.
FTA?
More to the point, “…he was in the USA on 9 September 2001 to get…” his riding instructions from Murdoch.
IIRC, he was actually in the mogul’s ante room, awaiting his turn when the planes hit the WTC.
Yes, you’re right of course DA. I was being very facetious. Howard’s role was important, as was Australia’s, in being one of the very few early legitimisers of what was regarded with horror by the civilised free world as a suicidal geostrategic absurdity, an impossibility. Until it…wasn’t.
Hope you’re well. That was a very painful and terrible time, which as BK correctly assesses, represents a wrong turn onto a road we’re still hurtling down today.
Bush, Blair, Howard. I won’t be reconciled until they are all in the International court on charges of crimes against humanity. That rodent became a crucial player in spite of his provincial status.
Well said, Jack. It would be interesting to see what might have happened if Twitter or its like had been around at the time. They might have got away with it, but I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t have been so easy.
It’s a good question, auds. I doubt it would have done much more than muddy the debates even more, though. At the risk of blowing my own forlorn trumpet rather pathetically and belatedly…a lot of us did try our best at the time to ‘tweet troof to power’ (as the kids say) in a pre-Tweet era. It was back in the old cut-n-paste, pre-Google, pre-auto comments day…good grief, the 24 hour days wasted, chain-smoking in front of the screen…my brother was deployed, as were many old army mates. I was terrified he was going to kill and/or die for the most rotten of stupid self-harming lies. Many did.
https://webdiaryarchive.com/author/jack/
Crikerians reckon I’m a long-winded ranter hereabouts…lol/tl;dr !!!
Auds, I think what broke my heart most then – still does – is that I was just one of millions and millions and millions worldwide who saw through this war ‘debate’, as it unfolded. People on the street in anger, who never had been before, and never would be again. And the ‘free media’, by and large, just chose not to see the lies. Made the choice.
I honestly think Iraq ‘broke the truth’. (Among, of course, so much else.) And we’re yet to fix our capacity to tell it to ourselves again. Trump was /is just a post-traumatic comorbid symptom of that breakage. Our paralysis in the face of CC, too. Maybe we can still recover.
Long winded maybe but that was in the ‘before times‘ – when most people could follow an argument and argue a case – halcyon days by comparison with today when attention span is decreasing, from minutes to single figures in seconds.
I don’t blame Tok-Tic so much as half a century of woeful educational standards.
Totally agree with your summation. Between Bush first stealing the election with the help of his brother, the Governor of Florida, FFS, and this comedy of black lies, certainly part of me died. Hundreds of thousands marched the SydHarb bridge to protest, over 90% recorded in polls as wanting no involvement in Iraq, and yet they then voted the weasel back in next election. Howard was reprehensible (G W Bush’s man of steel), but all those willing to forget and vote him back in deserve my distaste equally.
And still a PM can commit Australia to war without going through cabinet or the parliament. Surely that should stop.
Indeed Jack complete with extremely fuzzy film of said weapons being loaded onto trucks. Total and utter rubbish. Hundred of thousands around Australia marched against that terrible war. To no avail. I learnt a bitter lesson during that period.
Yep, you and me both, Maria, and as you say gazillions more of good faith right across the political spectrum. It left a lot of civic scars, beyond the obvious ones of wars. Lies of that magnitude and material impact are hard to reconcile with even a profound belief in humanity’s sentient majesty and optimistic rationality. I spent the best part of the next decade or so as a nightshift carer. Seemed a…psychologically gentler way to try to ‘do no harm’.
I too was angry Jack, still am. Back then I was a subscriber to the paper version of Time….they did report the truth (then anyway, no idea these days).
Remember reading endless, small-script pages from Military Generals who professed that the whole thing was a charade, a beat-up to get the US of A into a war…. fully stating there was no WMD ….my my…the arguments I had with friends, relatives, associates, anyone at all who spoke on the subject.
Of course I lost the argument every time and was told I was crazy ….turned out I wasn’t after all.
Come to think of it, the apologies were few and far between…. but it was so long ago.
Yes…and no. I sometimes think we’re trapped in a 9/11-traumatised stasis. Feels like we’re doing Iraq all over again, only with China this time. Glum thoguht.
Not so much that History repeats as it is flatulent.
At least M. Pujol, Le Pétomane, didn’t claim to make it rhyme, like Dylan.
Ah yes, Monsieur Le Petomane, who claimed he could fart at will. Nobodies knows what Will did to offend.
Nobody, of course. Why would spell check change that?
I recall Shrub, who was in Poland geeing up them up to break the international pact NOT to expand NATO, crowing as he grabbed desperately at a snippet of fake intel “Anyone who said there were no WMD ain’t bin payin’ attention, they just found ’em!”
Turned out to be a Mr Whippy van.
O Tempura, O Miso.
Mine came 13yrs earlier, pumping up the tyres of GWI (wadda concept, regnal numbering!) when the weeping daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the UN told of “seeing” innocent premie Kuwaiti babies being torn from incubators (presumably during her selfless hospital internship somehow squeezed into her busy NY highlife) by Iraqi stormtroopers – straight from the Belgian babies tossed & caught on the Huns’ bayonets playbook.
Nobody said nuttin’ though anyone who’d bothered to check would have known that she’d not been near her democracy enchain homeland in several years.
In our cut-price Idiotcracy it is sufficient to shout War on Utes, Death taxes and something, something…
Mainstream journalists adore wars, Selks. Adore them. Wars make tenured insto journalists feel important, and brave, and noble, and also…rad & hard-bit & world-weary & edgy…ooh, shiver-quiver-frisson of war reporter cred, all at once. So at the first whiff of cordite, these parasitical misery & mayhem frequent-flyers will jettison the last shreds of their b/s detector and their yarped vocational ideals, in a great ghoulish frenzy after sexy flak jackets selfies for the pool room, open expense accounts, green zone trysts with CNN hotties, $$$ future book deals.
I despise ‘war correspondents’, above all of the many flavours of easily-despisable meeja grub. Professional Killing Ground Tourists, not merely salivating over the death and destruction of faraway brown, black and yellow peoples. But unable – if they had the honesty to admit it – to resist the temptation to enable it, too. The beltway hacks, the marquee bylines, the 4Record rentboys and girls on political insiders’ speed dial. Mainstream journalists adore wars and mainstream journalism…made…Iraq happen. The CotW couldn’t possibly have pulled off the heist on truth without capital J Journalism. And Journalism knows it. That’s why little j journalists are still too ashamed to talk honestly about the brazenness of Powell’s lies, even now. The only Obit any of them deserve to write for him is ‘He lied through his teeth, and we wilfully pretended to swallow the lying lot, because we were itching to go to war, too.‘ His, and all the arrant nonsensical lies, from your ‘Kids torn from incubators’ through ‘Dissidents fed into shredders’ to…whatever b/s was uttered last week about the miserable Afghanistan abandonment. Yet another casualty of the CotW’s Iraq lies. We swaggered in and we broke the whole ‘Sandpit’ shop (some grub of a journo will have coined that sick tossaway tag, and will be coyly proud of it still). And then we just wandered away when playtime in the sandpit got a wee bit hard for us. Still, good old Journalism has been there to helpfully explain why we’ve remained decent and noble and brave and helpful every step of the way.
The reality is that wars of any but the truly defensive kind can’t exist without ‘Journalism’ (always just a posh word for ‘propaganda’). If Journalists were instead just ‘reporters’ and reported the truth about how wars start before they actually did we’d never have to go and fight one unnecessarily again. But Journalism adores war too much to seriously try to stop them. What is it now, Selks? ‘The Chinese want to nuke us’? Tomorrow?
Eff you, Journalism. Do your job for once, and just be reporters. Help stop a contrived war, not start one.
Ach, and here I am getting stupidly livid all over again, Selkie. The outrage of this stuff…it just doesn’t go away. And it shouldn’t go away. Not ever. Imagine what it’s like to be grieving for an arm or a leg or a brain or your balls, lost to Powell’s lies. Or a son or a daughter or dad or mum. Or…to be Iraqi. Or Chinese now/next, I suppose.
Hope you decide to hang about, Selkie.
I googled “CotW” but only found Klondike porn.
Not channelling Jack London are you?
Profound & shame faced apologies Jack.
I’ve just finished your opus – it needed a tea break – and realised what CotW was short for, Coalition of the Wankers.
No apology necessary, Tiresias…I’m off to google Klondike porn!
I am probably far too hard on journalism and journalists in the far-too-angry comment above. Apologies are probably due. I’m sorry for going OTT, journalism/journalists. It is an unwelcome reminder of how destructive that dishonest period was, to everyone and everything, not least civility. I do think some kind of collective vocational self-scrutiny for the media re: Iraq remains long overdue. (As does a proper, future-preventative Inquiry into the rush to war – since we seem intent on a repeat.)
Thought Powell’s death might have been a good opportunity for some honest reflection from the pro-invasion and even determinedly neutral press, at least. There’s no place for journalistic neutrality when the lies are so obvious. Trump surely demonstrated where that dishonest media folly leads, if Iraq hadn’t already.
Will give Crikey a breather from my unhappy acreages for a bit. The space I eat up is never less than greatly appreciated.
Oh I think your anger at the press, specifically the much valorized “war correspondent”, is pretty appropriate, Jack. The failure in reporting Powell’s speech was shocking. A telling forerunner was when Cheney et al attacked the credibility and authority of Hans Blix. From treating him and his mission with an appropriate level of respect, the media basically allowed him to be trashed, or at best neutralized as a credible investigator. He couldn’t find the evidence and he repeatedly said so, even though at the time, it later emerged, he thought the WMD probably did exist.
On the other hand, I’m a bit uncomfortable with the level of anger directed at Powell himself. His moral failure at the UN (and more importantly in the lead up to making that speech) was dreadful, as was his role in obscuring US atrocities in Vietnam, including My Lai, as documented by Griselda. To this I would add whatever role he played in the shameful encouragement and abandonment of Iraqi opposition groups in the denouement of Desert Storm. Yet he articulated a war doctrine which effectively learnt the lessons of Vietnam. And I was impressed at the time, and always wanted to learn more about, that one example of sensible thinking – the decision not to go on to Baghdad in 1991 (but then why did they encourage and betray the Kurds and others?)
Powell doesn’t deserve the current hagiography, but nor does he deserve the opposite. He was a black American “team player” who made his way from poverty in difficult careers, in a deeply flawed society, who when the crunches came could not stand against those whose interests he faithfully served.
Agree with this. Powell was at heart a soldier, doing his job as best he could, doubtless against his own moral and strategic instincts, and not quite recognising the profoundly different moral obligations of a uniformed and a civilian senior commander. The point is that our ‘Dogs of War’ aren’t supposed to be civic society’s moral guardians. They are, literally, a-moral professional legal killers. I don’t want a soldier to be my moral guardian; as a civilian, I’m supposed to be his or hers. And especially our press. It’s the war press’s job above all to watch our soldiers moral backs. Soldiers are the ones who at worst will have to live forever with their killing of someone on their personal conscience. The least we owe them is to explicitly bear the public moral burden, collectively. That’s the civic pact we make with our professional soldiery. Especially, it’s our press’s job to make sure they a) never glorify our soldiers or their professional brutal legal killing; nor b) crucify them for it, if/when the amorality of war should offend to our civilian delicacies.
Our press did exactly the opposite. Failed to protect our soldiers morally, by not shredding the obviously immoral dishonesty of the case for war, ahead of it. Then grotesquely glorified and distorted their professional killing while it was going on. And finally, are turning on them now, and lumping them as individuals with a moral burden it is actually our shared civilian obligation to carry.
But not one of us civilians has a right to morally condemn a Ben Roberts-Smith, say. Least of all anyone in the press. He did what we all sent him to do, in morally impossible circumstances, from Day 1. What exactly did everyone expect might happen, in a war based on such grotesque lies? Our soldiery to somehow salvage our moral failures, by somehow doing our bidded killing in a somehow ‘morally redeeming’ manner? Cleanse our consciences with a spot of saintly ANZAC derring-do?
It doesn’t work that way. It can’t. As a nation, our moral failures during the height of the ‘war on terror’ are a set of still-ignored and unexamined ugly truths we are going to have to confront, sooner or later.
Keith1, I wrote a lot on these lines nearly two decades ago, ahead of hostilities. How it would all unfold. It’s what makes our continuing dishonesty now so draining, but also so hard to let go. (We shouldn’t let it go). I wasn’t supposed to keep quacking on and I will stop now – I did want to say thanks for your kind and sensible perspective. I do agree with you about Powell. Chrs.
Cheers Jack. Keep well.
And to clarify re: BRS…by all means such conduct (alleged/prima facie, anyway) is to be condemned and addressed. But that’s our military’s right and obligation alone, and/or international war crimes courts. Australia’s various civilian mechanisms have forfeited any moral standing in such matters. We don’t get to judge our soldiery.
Wow so damn eloquently well put
Depressing but true. While the US is a Republic, it is not a real democracy. There’s a real irony in the names of its two major parties. If it’s people can’t find a third way I expect the whole world is in for a rough ride. I sometimes think that the US Civil War never really ended and that a further eruption is on the cards – lax gun controls won’t help.
While the US Constitution is a formidable piece of paper it is not enough to paper over the inbuilt fissures that have riven the United States since its inception. In much the same way, although far loftier in its protestions of racial, economic and social equality than our own poor equivalent, it was written by a class of slave owning agriculturalists and protectionist business owners in spite of their origins and their actual societal practices of the time. For the very same reasons, although of varying importance and gravity, our Constitution is showing very similar inadequacies for the post-modern world exacerbated by the same fear, vague unease or loathing our respective populations have often have for our political classes.
Having lived in the US for a time I have always marveled at the manner and extent to which their national mythology that has been inculcated into the rewriting of the aura surrounding the national beginnings underpinning their societal outcomes in evidence today. I have always been of the view that, of all the so called western democracies, the USA, with its popular and visceral distrust of Government and its wide spread, deep rooted subservience to ultra conservative, quasi-christian belief systems, was the most likely to slide towards, or even into, a rightwing dictatorship much in the style of those it fostered and protected for so long in Central and South America. I must admit that, in the throes of Trump’s exit from his Presidency, the societal and governance fractures in the US seemed to be writ larger than ever before.
Pretty much as de Tocquville warned, almost 2 centuries ago and Gibbon three.
Well written history. Greatest mistake by Colin Powell was to join the Republicans not the Democrats. He would have risen in a Democrat administration, and been given more respect from the Black community. Many of my Black American friends regarded him as an ‘Uncle Tom’ apologist for the pentagon war mongering Republican administrations. Such a pity.
I tell you what mods, I’ll keep it nice and simple. Here’s a piece from 1996 (by Robert Parry and Norman Solomon) documenting Powell’s role in covering up war crimes in Vietnam. Iraq was not the only blot…
https://consortiumnews.com/2021/10/18/behind-colin-powells-legend-my-lai/
Nice reminder.
Ever the enabler, may he rot in Hell.
Yeah, thanks for the link Griselda. It seems the template for how he behaved in 2003 was right there in Vietnam in 1968, if not earlier. If you are going to base your career on being the “consummate team-player”, you’d better pick your team very, very carefully.