The Pfizer vaccine is costing nations between US$10 and US$19.50 per dose, according to contracts released by nonprofit consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen.
Nine nations and unions’ contracts have been identified — Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, the Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the United States and the United Kingdom. The US paid the most, forking out US$1.95 billion for 100 million doses, while Brazil scored the best deal, paying $1 billion for the same number. The EU paid $18.60 per dose.
Previously it was revealed Isreal paid almost 50% more than the US, shelling out US$30 a dose and becoming the first country in the world to vaccinate the majority of its citizens.
If Australia bought enough Pfizer doses to cover its population and paid the same price as the EU, the cost would have been just under AU$1.3 billion — a fraction of what lockdowns have cost the economy.
The federal government has provided $507 billion in economic support since the start of the pandemic, with gross debt increasing to $872 billion this year. Recent COVID-19 lockdowns are estimated to have cost the country more than $25 billion.
The cost of Pfizer is low compared to other vaccines. In Australia, the polio vaccine costs $40 per dose, with three shots needed. The chickenpox vaccine costs $80 per dose, and hepatitis B costs $20 per dose. While these vaccines are free for children through the National Immunisation Program Schedule, funded by Medicare, those aged over 20 who weren’t vaccinated as children have to pay full price.
Health Minister Greg Hunt has been criticized for not scoring a deal with Pfizer despite being approached by company representatives back in June 2020, as COVID-19 plunged Victoria into its 112-day lockdown.
Modelling shows that, had we scored a deal back then, up to 150 deaths may have been prevented in NSW and Victoria. 2021 lockdowns would have been shorter, with 80% fewer new daily cases and a steep reduction in hospitalisations.
We’ll never know how much Australia paid per dose, as contracts are commercial in confidence, though it’s likely to be lower than what the US paid thanks to Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Purchasing for the whole country — rather than purchasing for a single state or insurance company — increases our bargaining power.
Australian drug prices are low by international standards, ranking 11th out of 50 countries for cheapest drugs thanks to the PBS.
Despite the comparatively low price, COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been accused of price gouging and profiteering off their products, with one analysis showing Pfizer has been charging up to 24 times the potential cost of production. Wealthier nations were first in line, making early deals for two doses and boosters, creating a monopoly over other parts of the world.
Vaccinating the country would have been even cheaper if there hadn’t been a scare campaign about Astra Zeneca.
AstraZeneca was a vaccine designed to slow down an outbreak.
It was never meant to be a mass vaccination for prevention of transmission.
As is being demonstrated now in the UK, the latest outbreak in the UK has a rate of 3vtimes higher (300)% than the Pfizer EU population and the mortality rate in the UK is 6 times higher (600%).
All the people who were vaccinated with AZ should be given a booster of Pfizer..
Given that other studies from UK show clearly better efficacy for AZ after 4-5 months, I suspect those figures you’re quoting may not be correct. Haven’t read those anywhere else. Was age and other health conditions taken into account, or just raw figures. Was AZ largely give. To the elderly and Pfizer to the young? I’m having trouble believing that, although not your sincerity in posting it.
The pharmaceutical industry should be nationalized and run as a public service (as should any number of other essential public services). The robber barons who run this industry are know for more that just ‘price-gouging’. They have the ability to hold a ‘country to ransom’ if they wish. There should be total transparency when it comes to disclosing the price a government pays for any essential commodity. The ‘commercial in confidence’ dupe should not be permitted in matters of national importance. This is an intolerable situation.
It’s not just that. Many significant drugs in the last couple of decades started with publicly funded research.
Absolutely, Audioio!!
Also, remembering high levels of vaccinations alone are not a panacea without retaining sensible low level precautions e.g. masking on transport, in super markets, evidence of vaccination for bars, cafes etc. with mandates for workforce and nudging those not vaxxed, to do so (e.g. start paying for tests).
However, one fears Australia will take the US and UK direction of promoting ‘freedom days’ which focuses upon citizens liberty, the economy but throws caution to the wind as it ignores significant gaps in any Covid strategy that remain, as evidenced by the rise in cases in the UK, US, Israel some weeks ago (improved), Eastern Europe and the Baltics.
Don’t be pushed into throwing the baby out with the bathwater…..
That is exactly what will happen.
Luckily we are doing it in summer – place your bets of when UK et al starting reaching 6 figure cases, 4 figure daily fatalities as the northern winter closes its clammy grasp and they all huddle indoors.
Pfizer $20 per dose. AZ $4 per dose and cheaper to distribute and manage due to storage at refrigerator temperature. We messed up demonising a safe, effective and much cheaper vaccine.
Almost as if it were deliberate – A/Z being supplied at cost was anathema to neolib instinct when there are big profits to be gouged.
AZ was an outbreak slower, that is it.
We had very little need for it, until the second outbreak.
If our government had done its job properly we would have fully vaccinated with a vaccine with a 95% effectiveness rate and a known reduction in transmission.
Not a vaccine with an 85% effectiveness rate and no noted reduction in transmission.
The second lockdown in Melbourne and the lockdown of SW Sydney would have been avoided.
One wonders gow the consultancy contracts are going.
Efficacy rates I have read have AZ around 92% against hospitalisation as opposed to 94% or 95% efficacy for Pfizer (a poofteenth difference), and with Pfizer’s efficacy dropping much faster than AZ, negligible real difference. The difference in transmission rates also don’t reconcile much with what I have read. Just saying. Haven’t read much reliable studies into transmission, understandably given that it would be near impossible to calculate in real world conditions. Not even Pfizer we’re claiming high impacts on transmissibility, and I can’t find anything that claims that AZ has zero effect on transmission. Hope your sources were broader than Pfizer’s website.
I can start a conspiracy theory with that. In whose commercial interests would it be for AZ to fail? Any journalist want to investigate Pfizer?
No someone took a deal from our “Best friend, Boris the stupid).
The real costs of not vaccinating everyone with Pfizer in the first place is starting to show where in the UK, the new surge of Covid19 is 3 times higher than the EU and the mortality rate is 6 times higher.
Mutterings of waning resistance and decreasing antibody numbers and the entire AZ vaccinated population needing a booster dose whilst Boris the BoJo has no plan B for the UK. This attitude will probably hold until the hospital system is on its knees.
Golly gee!! Australia id opening its borders to people with a double vaccination as of the first of December What could possibly go wrong with that?.
Would that coincide with Smirko the ScoMo’s return from Glasgow and his baffling them with BS tour?
Pfizer dosed will also require booster shots. Israel was virtually entirely Pfizer and they are lining up for boosters right now.