The federal government is spending $26,000 a week on Facebook advertising promoting a campaign about Australia’s emissions, criticised by a leading environmental group as being “half-truths and misrepresentations”.
The Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources spent $26,120 between November 1 and 7 to share six posts from the Facebook page “Australia’s Making Positive Energy”, coinciding with the start of COP26 in Glasgow. The ads tout Australia’s 20% reduction of emissions in the past 15 years as proof. They were shown to more than 6 million Australian Facebook users, according to Facebook’s ad library.
The campaign includes Google advertisements seen by Crikey, although details about that spend are not available.
But Climate Council senior researcher Tim Baxter said the campaign is misleading at best: “It’s a series of half-truths and misrepresentations.”
Baxter says promoting Australia achieving a reduction instead of, for example, educating Australians on energy efficiency, doesn’t make sense if the goal is to continue reducing emissions.
“It seems to be a particularly poor use of money except in the context of the upcoming election campaign,” he said.
The reason to be sceptical of the figures is that they use favourable ways of slicing emissions data. The 20% reduction figure is based on emissions including land clearing from 2005 — a drop that mostly came from changes to state laws and not federal actions.
If land clearing is excluded, Australia’s emissions have increased by about 5% in that time, Baxter says, while other OECD nations reduced theirs.
This spend comes as part of the federal government’s publicly funded $12.9 million campaign to “highlight a range of technologies where the [federal] government, business and communities are investing to grow new industries and jobs across the country while reducing emissions”, according to a September press release by Energy and Emissions Minister Angus Taylor.
In late October, the full spend of the campaign was revealed at Senate estimates. It also heard that the Energy Department would review if Liberal MPs breached guidelines by publishing advertisements about the campaign on their private social media accounts.
$26m is pocket change compared to the wasteful and corrupt misallocation of public money in which this woeful government has engaged for years. It is getting to the point where it would be an easier job for the ANOA to identify spending that is rationally justified rather than a predictable series of instances where the allocation of public money is corrupt or unjustified.
I was so appalled by Facebook’s behaviour over the US election one year ago that I set about divorcing Facebook. It took about a month for the decree to be made absolute so I have had a Facebook-free 2021. Highly recommended.
I’ve had a Facebook free life. Also highly recommended.
How about a 6 letter slogan – FukZuk?
Only half truths instead of “Alternate facts” could be considered an improvement for the Prime Marketer and then again, has he leaked anything lately?
It is now official from the mouth of Scotty from marketing .Today our great PM announced Big Business now runs this countries future climate change planning. WHAT THE FxxK has the PM lost the plot or is this just a one-day thought bubble?
I wonder if he’ll dare use the pithy phrase ‘Can-do Capitalism‘ in public rather than for biz conflabs?
How can such a compulsive liar be believed
I doubt that any but the terminally deluded believe him – the mystery is why they tolerate him.
Like Toned Abs the party’s numbers men hold their noses and squash decent disenters so long as he’s a winner.
The moment he ceases to be, he’ll be out on his ear – as in all his previous jobs.
Unfortunately, this time we, the taxpayers, provide the golden handshake – for the rest of his worthless life.
“Scammo” Morrison?