During the final parliamentary sitting days of the year, the strategy from Labor was simple: sit back and let the government self-combust. That hasn’t been particularly hard.
The Coalition will be breathing sighs of relief after sputtering to the finish line of a fortnight that began with deep internal division and policy stagnation and ended with a flurry of resignations and a senior minister stepping aside over allegations of abusive behaviour.
But both Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Labor Leader Anthony Albanese know none of this really matters. In the final sitting days of 2018, a bitterly divided government with no clear agenda lost votes on the House floor and saw ministers scramble for the exits. They were reelected with an increased majority.
The point is, most of the voters in the marginal seats that will decide the election pay little attention to what goes on in Parliament. So while the government might have “lost” the final sitting fortnight, Labor now faces the challenge of turning Morrison’s deceitfulness into an election-winning narrative that plays well in the living rooms of middle Australia rather than the bearpit of question time.
Labor’s strategy: cut out lines of attack for the government, focus on divisions within the government and Morrison’s character while leaving the policy powder dry until the last is working insofar as they head to summer in a strong position.
Calling the prime minister a liar might be enough to stay ahead in the polls, and flip enough seats to form a minority government (although Albanese has repeatedly ruled out a coalition with the Greens). But whether it’s enough to find the momentum needed to win back seven seats and govern in its own right is the cause of some angst, internal and external.
Within Labor, there is a range of views on the party’s election chances, from cautious optimism to jaded fatalism. Some see an electoral map where the gains are far clearer than at this stage in 2018. Others see losses awaiting in NSW, and Queensland and Tasmania remaining wildly unpredictable.
The source of some frustration boils down to a lack of policy detail from the opposition, and a feeling heading into summer that the electorate still doesn’t really know what it’s about. It’s telling that in recent weeks, the Coalition has accused Labor of having no policies, and trying to “sneak” into government. Coming from the most policy-indifferent government in living memory, that’s gotta hurt.
In fairness, Labor has slowly been dropping more policies in the past few weeks — plans for a family violence commissioner and to deliver better internet access for low-income families. They’re just relatively safe, small-ticket ideas that haven’t gotten a heap of attention. More scrutiny will fall on the opposition’s climate plan, quietly dropped today. By offering a 43% target — weaker than its 2019 offering — Labor is once again hoping to avoid getting dragged into the kind of scare campaigns that sank it in 2019.
If Labor does succeed in neutralising the climate wars, though, what then? A big part of Morrison’s pitch will focus on management of the pandemic. He’ll hope that despite lockdowns and outbreaks that stemmed from his government’s own failures on the vaccine rollout, the high vaccination rates and low deaths compared with the rest of the world is enough for voters to hold their noses and trust the devil they know.
The pandemic has always been uneasy ground for Labor, as it has been for opposition parties around the world. This week, amid fears about the Omicron variant, Labor returned relentlessly to the government’s failure to develop purpose-built quarantine camps to house foreigners — a burn which might excite the “pro-restrictions, lock the gate” elements of their base, but seems less of a clear vote-winner among people craving a return to normal. Other attacks over hip-pocket issues like high petrol prices and wage stagnation are yet to really cut through.
Still, despite all that uncertainty on policy and narrative, Labor’s position is strong. The polling is good and the government is tired. An energised Albanese will hold his first campaign rally this weekend before hitting the road. And as Morrison proved last time around, sometimes it really is only the campaign that matters.
The LNP hasn’t had a vision for Australia since 2013, or before, yet they keep getting elected.
Why does Labor have to have one? Why isn’t this question put to the LNP as frequently as it is to Labor?
Good question.
How gun-shy is our media in their reticence to call against the Coalition – after the last election?
That is the biggest question in Australian politics, along with why Labor has to have a charming, charismatic, omniscient, cleanskin leader when any old empty-suit/idiot/scoundrel will suffice for the Liberals. Those questions should be put to the press gallery as well as the LNP.
You shouldn’t let the voters off the hook so easily.
Sure they have a vision. It’s for a feudal Australia.
Agree, journalists could ask themselves the question as to why the ‘fair and balanced’ legacy media is mostly right wing, or at best anodyne, especially since (political) media helped move the Overton window to the right since Howard and more so with 9Fairfax consolidation?
This still includes catering to middle aged, often regional and older Australians via rusted onto legacy media, who dominate electoral rolls, over more diverse, educated middle aged and younger Australians interests.
Complicit in being used by power for power, ignoring LNP’s lack of, or suboptimal policy development, outsourced to (imposed by?) the IPA etc., becoming ‘owned’ like the GOP and UK Tories, as radical right libertarian policy delivery system and promoting imported US socioeconomic policies; though our media do not seem to realise that they are being gamed.
If you want to be mainstream and ‘earn the big bucks’ you obey the master’s voice. The ABC used to be the benchmark, but after decades of budget cuts and LNP interference, well, even Ita’s not right wing enough any more. Honest, balanced journos now have to go online and somehow try to rise above all the dross that’s out there.
Oh but Tony Abbott had ‘cut through’, you know. Just look where that got us.
I personally hold Labor to a higher standard. I remember Gough, Hawke and Keating, and even, in hindsight, knowing they weren’t perfect, by god they were able to have gutsy policies and argue for them. And they were of the people and for the people and we knew it. Probably the only other that comes close was Gillard. Name me one Liberal in that category. That’s why I need Labor to have a vision, and to have the guts to put forward policies that will actually further the nation, and to be able to argue for them. I’m not seeing any of that at the moment…
No, it probably doesn’t matter one whit if they won the final weeks. Because Clive Palmer’s next $70M of distorted & destructive advertising is yet to be rained upon the hapless electorate.
Peta and hubby are just lusting for the Labour Party’s vision statement……….. right Brian ?
How about ‘not being corrupt’ as a vision statement ?
Whatcha think Peta/Brian ?
A most effective three word slogan. It sings to me.
The problem with “not being corrupt” is it’s like a bubble – one prick and it bursts. Any single nondescript and unimportant transgression can render the slogan impotent. Need something more impregnable than that.
How does anyone guarantee there’s no corruption. It matters how you deal with it. There used to be a time when a premier had to resign over a gifted bottle of wine.
Give me gutsy, nation building vision statement any time. We haven’t had one from either the libs or labor for decades.
Then there’s the corollary :- Has Morrison “flipped enough seats” to degenerate to minority government? With any of these “saviour” Independents supporting the government they are campaigning against :- ‘doing a Lucy Gichuhi’?
Watch Eddie McGuire for instance, just as an example, Eddie asks a question about former prime ministers, not a political question, surely a history question.The reaction from the contestant is “pass, pass, hate politics, hate politics”.I am afraid that reaction is ingrained in more and more people. They have just switched off and they don’t know or care.
“pass, pass, hate politics, hate politics”All part of the grand design that is Neoliberal media.
I too remember the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, when the population loved politicians with a simple and honest energy.
I’ve got a history question for you …
Until the Right machine took over Labor in the 80s the majority of its MPs were known to the electorate, lived and probably once worked amongst them and could be fronted in the pub or corner shop if necessary.
Try that now with any soft handed MP, apart from Greens – constantly surrounded by minders, bodyguards and flaks – already a political caste, as irrelevant as Bourbons most of whose attributes they share, except that no-one would want them with coffee.