
As New South Wales throws off the mantle of vaccine Stalino-Nazism, as the flights start landing in Tasmania, the news is exciting: there’s another new COVID-19 variant on the way. What? No, not Omicron. OMG Omicron, more like Overcron. Catch up.
Omicron is everywhere already, has been for weeks and is, we are told — on no sure authority — far less severe in its effects than Delta, which is still in the charts. No, not Omicron. I’m talking about the Pi-variant. Or maybe it will be Rho. Or Omega. Whatever, it’s the one that will come to us not from Africa but from Papua New Guinea and/or Indonesia.
Lucky us, of all those in the First World, we’ll get it first. It may be even less severe in its effects than Omicron, if that’s even true of Omicron. But there is no iron law of declining virulence, and so it may reboot. But whatever it will be it is coming.
The coming of our own neighbourhood variant will be a product of our immense failure in dealing with COVID as a regional issue, a subset of the failure of dealing with COVID as a global issue. Our lazy, cynical, corrupt, incompetent federal government, led by a prime minister whose inability to act decisively is a product of the fatalistic brand of Christianity he follows, failed the initial test of COVID multiple times until pushed to action by the separate action of state governments, events which made visible the joins of the federation for the first time in decades.
When it finally got its act together, the very sense of national purpose it relied on created a “second order” error in ignoring the realities of geography, and treating countries surrounding us as afterthoughts, charity cases. National purpose discovered late revived the bedevilling national illusion that because we are a continent-nation, we can separate ourselves entire.
It should have been obvious from the start that political — not merely physical — geography should have played the greater role, and that we were the rich colonial nation in a sea of underdevelopment that is partly a product of our brilliant progress.
Our quest for vaccines was first lazy, then obscene, without any intervening period of decency as we scrambled to scarf up whatever we could, and boosters on top. Now we’re in the situation where we lack sufficient boosters for ourselves — sufficient to close the five-month gap for the elderly and chronically ill — and there is also gross under-vaccination of the countries around us. Papua New Guinea is at 2.4%.
Dumb and evil, we got the quinella. OK, evil is unfair. There is a regional buying scheme in place, and its failures and ineffectualities have many causes. Application of mass healthcare in countries lacking adequate infrastructure can’t be done with the wave of a hand, and one can’t keep pointing out why they lack it forever. Furthermore, a more sweeping scheme in the earlier stages to prepare for the prospect of mass vaccination would have brought accusations, and the real practice of, colonial paternalism, if not outright bastardry.
Would Labor be any better? Probably less worse — significantly so, depending on the personage. The only two PMs who would have had the vision and focus to conceive of such a plan and get it done would have been Kevin Rudd and Bob Hawke, both with a bit of help from their friends. Malcolm Turnbull would have had the idea but fluffed it. Julia Gillard persuaded towards it.
What would that wider vision entail? It would have been a buyers’ club essentially — say ourselves, PNG, East Timor, Bougainville, New Zealand and south-west Oceania on the market for enough vaccines for everyone, and with the radical notion that they go first where most needed to stop the spread, second where comorbid chronic illnesses and age are greatest (as a combo) across the whole zone, and third, absolutely equally and proportionally by country with no regard to purchasing power.
To sell that deal back to the Australian people would have taken a real leader. The point is that any real leader would have jumped at the chance because the moment would have occurred at the juncture of national self-interest and universal morality, which is where the chance to be part of history occurs. Hawke would have been flying around the islands injecting people, his tears a level four biohazard; Rudd would have learnt all 700 of New Guinea’s languages to chat nonchalantly with village headmen for the cameras. But they would have sold it to us as what we needed to do, for ourselves, even if we were cross-subsidising to our immediate detriment — the health of others.
Currently we have provided the equivalent of Panadol and a leaflet on scabies. Any genuinely regional scheme would have involved not only a buyers’ club on the three principles above, the contributions calculated by gross GDP.
Indonesia would have to have been related to in a more federated way, its size and other factors making for vast complexity. Debts and interest payments to Australian banks would have had to be paused or forgiven. Mobile hospitals and some sort of combined “vaccine corps” would have had to be created, in parallel with existing health systems.
The last of these especially would be a nightmare of colonialism, condescension, inefficiency, corruption and pettiness from both ends, but all those are not arguments against it, but arguments for doing it. Why? Because we are going to have to do it for the next, nastier virus, for the coming climate catastrophes and biosphere disasters, and much more.
Whatever the history of our relations with each other, we are in the region, the region is all of us, and there is no other solution. The Third Worldism that issued from Bandung — currently ravaged by COVID, I presume — in 1955 is gone now; its remnant is Chinese investment, and a lot of countries are recognising that the new Beijing consensus looks like the old Washington consensus, at the same rate of interest.
COVID was a rehearsal for Delta; Delta was the dress rehearsal for Omicron. Omicron is the tech rehearsal, with the lighting rig falling from the sky. We stuffed them all, and showtime is approaching. Our state forms are from the 1648 treaty of Westphalia, their relations from the 1815 Congress of Vienna, the north-south imperial dimensions of it are from the 1875 scramble for Africa, and the world is a high-tech petri dish in rising oceans and dying food chains.
Quite aside from our reciprocal responsibilities, it is only in the context of a regional, fair solution that we could full-throatedly demand that the government STOP SCREWING UP AND ROLL OUT THIRD DOSES IMMEDIATELY!
Your correspondent has, you will be shocked to hear, one or two comorbidities. Yet the only moral action we could make now is to send all third doses, save for those for the severely immunocompromised, to East Timor, PNG etc as first or second doses. Only COVID’s relatively low death rate is hiding from us the obscenity of how we are doing this.
We are going to need to change very smart, very fast, and try to fail a little less at doing so. History repeats as tragedy, farce and a bad Dr Who episode. Omicron is here, Omega is coming. If we keep missing chances to change ourselves, it will change us anyway.
PNG’s low vax rate is due to a wholesale rejection of the vaccine, especially in the non-urban areas (which is about 85% of the entire population.)
Sending vaccines to PNG at the moment would just lead to them expiring, in a warehouse somewhere.
A culturally sensitive and persuasive marketing campaign is what’s needed, one that is not science based or political.
Trying to get a PNG pollie to support pro-vax campaigns is difficult, as they risk incurring the wrath of a large chunk of the population. On top of that, the glacial speed that the pollies move at during normal times, makes the whole operation the most frustrating thing on earth.
A plus side is that much of the population is so remote, it offers a form of protection. However, if the virus does manage to get in, it’s pretty much game over.
The PNG government have a simple decision to make: do something, or do nothing. If they represent the best interests of the country, they have to choose to do something, even if it is potentially politically risky, imo.
I was about to make this comment myself. Until you can work out how to reverse society-wide vaccine refusal, there’s no point in sending those third doses to PNG etc. We might as well use them ourselves. It’s a very difficult situation to address.
Sub-Saharan African countries destroyed a lot of AZ due to a multitude of factors, including poor refrigeration. It’s not just the amount of vaccines needed in the Third World, it’s getting them to where they’re needed and persuading the dubious to take them.
We convinced millions that some white dude is their saviour, now surely a little jab is doable. Carn Scott, where’s that missionary zeal when it’s really needed?
Bravo, Rundle.
Rather than griping about whether we should still be wearing masks or how fair it is to prevent the unvaccinated from attending a cricket test this should be the nation’s pressing subject. But our Prime Minimal & his clueless ministry have no concept of the Big Picture. Their focus is purely on re-election. You are right about Rudd, Hawke & Turnbull.
Thanks Guy.
CSL should continue producing COVID vaccines.
Absolutely and offering them, with logistical assistance, to the Indonesia government also. Again good for our long term self interest, if we cannot stomach good neighbourly actions
What I don’t understand, is that surely it should take far less than stellar leadership to propose an Australian-led vaccination drive?
Wouldn’t an opportunity to be colonial and condescending would be quite popular in Aus? Especially as we do it with the Aboriginal intervention already.
Very appropriate. I note that most of the comments seem to have missed the point. Why do we have all sorts of agreements (economic, military etc.) and relationships with the whities in the World (UK, USA) but not to the same extent with our neighbors?
Yes we have some token relations but not as intimate as with our WASP mates. Like having an indigenous neighbor next door whom we are friendly with but not great mates.
Love your work Guy.
The level of engagement we have with other countries can be solely explained by the color of their skin and religion? You dont think their wealth, trade potential, military power, defence materiel supply chains, style of government, historic military assistance etc has anything to do with it?
Hmmm, nobody tried to ‘solely’ explain anything.
But speaking of curious strawmen, do you think the colour of their skin and religion might have anything to do with their wealth, trade potential, military power, defence materiel supply chains, style of government, historic military assistance etc?
A article which is a very good example – in my opinion.
https://johnmenadue.com/the-wests-diplomatic-boycott-of-winter-olympics-is-gold-medal-hypocrisy/
Sitting close by is Indonesia – Brown and Muslim with a current population of 277,701,960 as of Monday, December 13, 2021. Should we be a true friend and a good neighbor or just the racist nation next door?
Do we really want to turn them into a threat?
Where did anyone suggest we turn Indonesia into a threat? We have extensive agreements with Indonesia, including military ones. Agreements that sometimes become awkward.
Working cooperatively to buy or develop or manufacture vaccines I fully agree with. But are you suggesting Australias 25million should subsidise Indonesias 277million? Islanders and PNG sure, but Indonesia? 277 million of them?
From a scientific POV, the idea of protecting ourselves from covid by specifically vaccinating our neighbors is nonsense in this day and age of international travel. Many of the island nations are only now seeing their first covid cases.
Putting aside humanitarian reasons, we need to protect the neighborhood from Covid and other threats (eg climate change) to prevent failed states on our door step. Cold but true.
Where did anyone suggest we turn Indonesia into a th reat? We have extensive agreements with Indonesia, including military ones. Agreements that sometimes become awkward…
Our efforts at training Kopassus went well, in Timor & West Papua.
Maybe they could be seconded to handle HELPEM FREN given the current unrest in the Solomons.
Indonesia has always been considered as a military threat. Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.
Working cooperatively to buy or develop or manufacture vaccines I fully agree with. But are you suggesting Australias 25million should subsidise Indonesias 277million? Isla nders and PNG sure, but Indonesia? 277 million of them?
From a scientific POV, the idea of protecting ourselves from covid by specifically vaccinating our neighbors is nonsense in this day and age of international travel. Many of the island nations are only now seeing their first covid cases
Putting aside humanitarian reasons, we need to protect the neighborhood from Covid and other th reats (eg climate change) to prevent failed states on our door step. Cold but true.
(Struck by the madbot)
So much hypocrisy from the West. Most countries in Asia have been the recipients of vaccines from China which we decry as “Vaccine Diplomacy”. No such claims when it suits us (the West) to do so. We are the racist nation next door and all of Asia is certainly aware of it.
Not that any Asian nation would care about racism, it being the essence of their own cultures.
Racism is alive and thriving in ALL cultures. But our left fringe likes to portray WASPs as the worlds only racists.
Han Chinese v Uyghurs
Japanese v Koreans
Hutus v Tutsi
Pakistan v India
….
….
…
Fervent Hindus are racist to each other, caste.
They learned from the master, Whitey.
Caste predates Stonehenge.
A Caste is a Class in Indian Society not race. Classes in society have always existed.
As colonies of England, yes all these “whities” and WASP countries have many many things in common, such as what I mentioned. Wealth, military power, etc, plus language and culture which I forgot to mention.
But its these commonalities that bind the 5 eyes together as an enduring alliance, one that should be to our great advantage, well except for Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan….
Chicken and the egg isn’t it.
My point was that we need to focus on those powerful alliances for obvious reasons. Claiming we do it simply because we are WASPs is a bit ridiculous.
We need to have alliances with Korea, Japan, India, Indonesia etc for the same expedient reasons.
…and yes, even for just self interest alone, we should look after our neighborhood too, rich or poor.
…and yes we should do it for humanitarian reasons as well.