Now we know what was occupying Scott Morrison in the latter stages of last week: not addressing the aged care emergency, not responding to the sector’s plea for boots on the ground in facilities across the country, but scripting a pantomime to respond to the revelation that Barnaby Joyce, less than a year ago, thought Morrison was “a hypocrite and a liar… over a long time” who “earnestly rearranges the truth to a lie”.
Joyce, of course, had just days earlier demanded that the perpetrator of the “psycho” text out themselves, prompting Brittany Higgins to point to Joyce’s hypocrisy by releasing his text.
That Joyce is a hypocrite is hardly news. Nor is his stunning — indeed, colossal — lack of judgment, particularly his enthusiasm for opening his mouth when good sense suggests he should keep it firmly shut. Even now, some in the press gallery peddle the myth that Joyce is some sort of avatar of authenticity, some plain-speakin’ tribune of the inarticulate, whose inability to talk in coherent sentences elevates him to political genius. In fact he loses votes for the Coalition every time he opens his mouth, which he does with alarming frequency.
But it took the genius of Morrison to make Joyce look even more of a fraud than he normally does.
The pantomime confected by Morrison and his office was that Joyce would apologise, offer to resign and explain that while he’d never worked closely with Morrison, he had completely changed his opinion now that he had. Morrison generously forgave Joyce his indiscretion.
That story was rushed to News Corp in order to get ahead of the publication of the text by Nine’s James Massola, who’d contacted the PMO to seek a response. Niceties like the fact that Joyce’s position is the gift of his partyroom, and not the prime minister, were overlooked.
Of all that, the excuse that Joyce hadn’t worked closely with Morrison was the most risible, given they’d been in cabinet from 2013-18, including two years when Joyce was deputy prime minister and Morrison was treasurer.
Two budgets’ worth of expenditure review committee meetings is more than enough to qualify as working closely with someone, but perhaps Joyce was distracted during all those meetings or suffering a health issue of some kind. Certainly Morrison seemed to suggest all was not well with Joyce, referring to how he had been “in a different headspace last year, both professionally and personally”.
But that’s Morrison’s way — criticism of him by colleagues is always brushed off as the result of some sort of implied mental health issue. Julia Banks’ criticism of the bullying, abuse and misogyny she’d endured from Liberal colleagues when Morrison ascended to the prime ministership saw Morrison suggesting she needed support. “My first concern is for her welfare and well-being and she is taking the time to ensure that that is taken care of,” he said, in effect saying her criticisms were the result of her own version of a “different headspace”. Same thing with Tasmanian MP Bridget Archer after she crossed the floor last year, only to be dragged into a meeting with Morrison which the gaslighter-in-chief later described as “I wanted to ensure that she was being supported”.
It takes a special kind of ego to see any criticism by colleagues as a product of a mental health issue, rather than being grounded in reality. But that’s Morrison.
While this pantomime was being staged by Morrison and his office, more seniors were dying in aged care, tens of thousands were continuing to endure lockdowns, and providers were struggling to ensure residents had basic services. The possibility of using ADF personnel in residential care, floated at the end of last week, vanished again. Perhaps Morrison knew any announcement that he made on that would be overwhelmed by questions about why so many people who have dealt with him say he is a liar.
In any event, there were, it seems, more high-priority political problems to deal with than the deaths of hundreds of seniors and the misery of thousands. Aged care residents are in a “different headspace”, as well. It’s one that the government continues to inflict on them through its inaction.
This entire pantomime is nauseating. Both Scotty and Barnaby deserve to be thrown out. They disgust me, playing these political games whilst our most vulnerable in our aged care and disability sectors are left suffering and dying. The most appalling and heartless government Australia has even seen.
Bernard, no matter which way the coin spins it invariably has to stop spinning and this Government has been spinning for to long, it just keeps finding ways to dig itself deeper into a pit with no way out!
Last year I heard on Late Night Live that the GG has the right to sack the PM. We urgently need an Federal Election as soon as possible. Australia is in a much worse condition than in 1975. How is it that the current government is still in?
Has anyone seen the GG lately?
In 1975 supply had been blocked by the Senate delaying the passing of the Government’s financial bills. We currently have supply.
Quite. Although there was also some sleight of hand by Kerr and Fraser to exaggerate the reality and to prevent any resolution before they brought down Whitlam.
The notion the GG should dismiss this government just because it is, in the view of some, a pack of bumbling dolts and weirdos driving the country into the ground, is absurd. Who elected the GG? No, if Parliament lacks the gumption to put country before party then we are just stuck with it. More fool us, electing such MPs. But that’s why the ruling class like elections, they are reasonably controllable despite the appearance that the people have a say occasionally.
Quite. Although there was also some sleight of hand by Kerr and Fraser to exaggerate the reality and to prevent any resolution before they brought down Whitlam.
The notion the GG should dismiss this government just because it is, in the view of some, a pack of bumbling buffoons and weirdos driving the country into the ground, is absurd. Who elected the GG? No, if Parliament lacks the gumption to put country before party then we are just stuck with it. More fool us, electing such MPs. But that’s why the ruling class like elections, they are reasonably controllable despite the appearance that the people have a say occasionally.
Apologies for multiple variations on this comment appearing here. I was trying to appease the mod bot, which took umbrage over all the variations I devised.
As I understood the conversation “blocking supply” is not the only reason for an election to be called.
The other two are loss of confidence, which doesn’t mean loss of majority (although NewsCorp would have you believe so) and the GG going bonkers.
There is no possible way the GG can get involved when the problem to be addressed is nothing more than the government making a diabolical mess of the job. The body with responsibility for removing a crap government before the government bumps into the constitutional time limit is parliament. You can probably work out why parliament is not doing this now and is very unlikely to do so any time soon, but really, your complaints should go to your elected representatives. Leave the GG out of it. Things are quite bad enough already without setting up the GG to terminate any government the GG takes against.
The Westminster system is quite clear and simple to enact – government is formed by which ever group (no mention of Party, esp the modern abominations) can garner Confidence and Control the Floor of the House of Reps.
There is no such post as Prime Minister – only the convention of primus inter pares.
When the pares are more like rotten pears as is shown by the current prime minimal.
No chance as long as ‘Labor’ keeps voting with tories to exclude other arrangements.
It’s quite clever how a system of government that appears in theory to offer at least some degree of democratic accountability has been shaped and modified over the years, by innovations such as the position of the Prime Minister wielding many of the powers of the Crown, and the dominance of the major political parties, into a system where the plain folk can exert almost no influence at all.
This is quite an idle digression, but there used to be other mechanisms of ministerial accountability. Bills of attainder against a named individual could be passed by parliament and occasionally resulted in a minister being beheaded. This was not entirely a good thing and the power to pass such bills was formally abolished in the UK in the 19th C. The status of the power to impeach a minister is less clear. It has not been done in a very long time in the UK and never in Australia. But in the UK the power was revived in the 19th C after it had been unused for centuries so perhaps it could be used again, at least in the UK. The lack of any reference to impeachment in the Australian constitution is, I fear, an insurmountable obstacle.
…but….but..surely a…text, zut! O, zounds, an earth-shattering, cataclysmic, epoch-shfting – nay, Cosmically Disrupting!! – …two year old text!! O, e-Ring the e-bells, e-invert the Regal e-Standard, lock away the treasures of empire and exile the saintly relics…4 LOL OMG WTF #shocky-wocky-face crazy-face crying-face #t’is shorely #End Times.
Hashtag set your e-affairs in order, e-brethren of e-Crikey, eee by gum, e-End of e-Days Is e-‘ponst e-us…
Hashtag e-chortle, click-minus, click-plus, click-go-the-shears.
Far out Jack, sleep it off..!!
Mate, aside from Sinky, you pappy lot appear to be seriously discussing the urgent need for the GG to….sack ScoMo…?
Who was mentioning Bex just b4…?
…wayyy too cerebral.
Methinks cerebral may be off the mark, anatomically speaking.
Try the other end.
yes yes titty boom
Just an old man who doesn’t understand how the world has changed.
Nah, ‘a-hole’ is way better VJ…
Didn’t realise you were a Pentecostal.
You can even write in tongues.
The ink tastes foul.
it’s the lumpen anti-wit that jags the gag reflex tho’…
points for a new line at least, quinny
The GG also has the right to suspend the rule of law, send the AFP around to your house, order you rolled in honey, tied over an ants nest for a day, and then hung up upside down for the passing populace to throw stones at you until you are dead. For the hell of it. He has absolute and unfettered powers. He has the full plenipotentiary powers of the monarch and can use them at his whim. He just never uses them, so no one will ever be subjected to such indignities. And the very few powers that are used are incredibly tightly controlled by convention. The conventions work both ways. Prime Ministers are meant to be constrained from doing the unthinkable by the fact that is meant to always be in the back of their minds: if the PM went off the deep end, the GG could in theory withdraw his commission at any moment. He is PM soley at the GGs pleasure. The GG is restrained by the same thing, use these powers incorrectly, even once, and they’ll either be removed by the government, or by revolution.
The actual powers that can be used are vague. There are some letters that stipulate what, when, why, where, and how the monarch could use them in the UK (most significantly the Lascelles Principles), and the Australian system takes some guidance from them.
So to the actual powers.
The GG can dismiss the government if it cannot ensure supply. We didn’t know this was an actuality until 1975. Kerr was the first to use it, but by doing so he’s set the precedent through out the realms.
If a PM loses the confidence of the house the GG can”invite” the PM for a chat and ask for his advice. By convention the PM can only give one item of advice, “Your Excellency I advise you to accept my resignation, and invite the Leader of the Opposition to form a Government”, although the PM might be able to get a second go at proving they actually did have confidence. Once summoned the Leader of the Opposition only has two choices, either accept the invitiation to become PM, or decline it. Declining such an invite means the GG gets to call an election without being so advised by the government.
After an election the GG gets to invite the leader of the party most likely to control the house to form government. By convention he is meant to call the current PM first. Who are by convetion if they have lost are meant to advise the GG to call on the Leader of the Oppostion to form government.
Then more obtuse, the GG can deny a request to disolve parliament, or one house of it for an election. In 1975 Kerr indicated that would be is response to Whitlam asking for a disloution of half the Senate. This one has been used multiple times in multiple realms.
If the government failed to request the dissolution of the Parliament by it’s expiration date then in all probability the GG would just call an election any way.
The GG can refuse royal assent to any bill. Has never happened since Federation.
There are a few others, but they are of little import in the sacking of a government.
So the only two that apply in this situation are 1) supply. Nope, the government can get all it’s money bills through. And 2) confidence of the house. Even if they lost several seats they’d still command confidence because a number of the cross bench would support them regardless. So even in a minority parliament they’d be safe.
In the unlikely event that confidence was lost between now and when the election is due would Albo accept the invitiation to form government? Not likley, he’d much rather have an election and get an even bigger win out of it. While the GG could, because he’d been reading all the comments sections in Crikey and the print media and decided like so many other people he was over it all, call an election, he simply just won’t.
It is unfair to criticise prime minister Morrison for not working hard.
He managed to find the time last week to attend a hairdressing salon and wash a young woman’s hair. This shows he “gets it”. The womens problem has been dealt with.
Unlikely to have been one of Jen’s ideas though.
Guarantee.
Every woman in the land must have shuddered at the very thought.
I found it icky!
I heard about that. Is this guy really so oblivious to how he is viewed. He has confirmed his martian origins.
He was just “laying on of his hands”.
Or Morrison’s version of Jesus washing his disciples’ feet.
… Or Mr Magoo’s version?
At the Last Supper?….
More like his cuz, preparing the way by anointing with flowing water the heads of flock.
You’ve undersold Morrison, Bernard. While plotting the ingenious strategy to grant a pardon to Joyce (aka Cousin Jethro) the PM took the time to show his compassionate side by washing a voter’s hair. A female voter, no less. And a bank of cameras was present, how fortuitous.
Meantime many thousands of elderly people remained locked in their rooms, some dehydrating, others unable to feed themselves, others incontinent & soiled, many frightened. But, hey, that’s politics….
And probably not having their hair washed.
By anyone.