Here’s a tale about industrial relations in the aftermath of a plague.
In 1348 the Black Death reached England and wiped out 40-60% of the population. One of the many consequences of that colossal tragedy was that labour became dramatically scarcer in the English economy.
Normally that would mean a dramatic improvement in wages as employers — primarily landowners, because this was a medieval agrarian economy — bid for scarcer labour. Except, employers also happened to wield enormous influence as the aristocratic advisers and agents of the king, Edward III. So they got a law passed a year later, called the Ordinance of Labourers, to ban wage rises above pre-Black Death levels and prohibit employers from trying to lure workers with higher wages.
It wasn’t overly successful, so in 1351 they tried it again with the Statute of Labourers. And they kept trying to use their access to political power to prevent market forces from driving wages up over the ensuing decades.
In the end English peasants got so pissed off with the constant attempts to suppress their income there was a truly bloody Peasants’ Revolt in 1381.
Things have changed a great deal in the last 670 years — certainly in relation to our ability to respond to pandemics. But employers haven’t changed much. They’re still using their access to power — brought with donations to the Coalition and their alliance with the business press — to prevent market forces driving wages up.
And as yesterday’s wage price index (WPI) data for the December quarter shows, they’re succeeding.
That data shows there are only two possibilities about the incessant chatter from business and economists about a tight labour market that we’ve now been hearing for over 12 months.
Either it’s complete garbage and employers are simply making up claims that they’re unable to find workers, or we have an industrial relations system skewed so savagely against the interests of workers as to prevent the normal functioning of labour market pressures. Australian workers are being treated no better than the peasants who survived the plague, because employers and the government are using the legal system against them.
The wage price index for the December quarter released yesterday showed wages growth of just 0.7% and 2.3% for 2021 as a whole; it was 0.7% and 2.4% for the private sector. The result for private sector workers was unchanged from the September quarter. That is, things didn’t improve at all for workers throughout the second half of 2021.
In fact in real wage terms, Australian private sector workers went backwards by 1.1% — and 0.6% in the December quarter alone. And, for those neoliberal economists who insist you can’t use headline CPI to discuss real wages, real wages growth was even below the Reserve Bank’s (RBA) preferred trimmed mean inflation result of 2.6% (presumably when those economists go to Woolies, they get some secret “trimmed mean” discount that the rest of us miss out on).
And so, for all the whingeing about the lack of workers over the course of 2021, there’s little evidence that employers are prepared to pay more — or that workers have the power to bargain their way to better outcomes. Wages growth remains stuck at pre-pandemic levels. Just as employers like it. Just as employers in 1349 liked it.
Too harsh? Melodramatic? Well, let’s talk about wage theft.
At the same time of the release of the wage price index, Woolworths — speaking of — was ‘fessing up that the bill for its wages underpayment scandal had soared to $571 million.
Any more and we’re starting to talk real money, huh?
Woolies has been assiduous in tracking its underpayments and compensating workers for them — good on them. But it’s a truly staggering amount even for a major employer.
Want to know why wages have been stagnant for Australian workers? It’s partly because not just Woolies (and Coles) but a large number of our biggest employers operating across a huge range of industries have systematically ripped their workers off — so much so that it’s entirely appropriate to say that wage theft is part of the business model of Australian capitalism.
And wage theft is coupled with an industrial relations system in which the right to strike has been dramatically curtailed — reducing strike action to levels so low you need a microscope to see it (witness the hysterical reaction of politicians — from Scott Morrison on down — to what they thought was a NSW rail strike but which turned out to be entirely the fault of NSW rail bureaucrats and the buffoon David Elliott).
Private sector economists are still tipping wages growth will surge and the Reserve Bank will have to lift interest rates. At least the RBA itself is staying realistic, insisting in its February statement on monetary policy “most firms in the bank’s liaison program are not anticipating wage increases to move beyond the two to three per cent range over the coming year. This is consistent with other surveys of wages growth expectations”.
And the RBA also pointed out that: “aggregate WPI outcomes have continued to be weighed down by slower growth in wages for jobs covered by public and private enterprise agreements. These subdued outcomes are consistent with announced government wages policies and the multi-year duration of many private sector agreements.”
Another example of how the IR system is structurally designed to prevent pay rises even when employers claim they can’t find labour.
How long until workers revolt? You can bet it won’t be 30 years.
The answer’s simple, folks. If your job is covered by a union, join. If it’s not, form one.
Just don’t expect to see too much from your union dues for a decade or so. It will take at least that long to redress the imbalance of power that exists between employers and employees today, and at least that long for the union movement to recover sufficient strength to be able to significantly influence wage justice.
Oh! And don’t, don’t, DON’T ever vote Liberal again, or vote for any party whose preferences flow through to the Libs.
Agree, many unions, especially those covering problematic sectors, occupations or workplaces, need to do more outreach and promotion, but knowing full well that Oz media does not support employees’ rights, let alone unions.
Even The Guardian barely mentions unions, workplace coverage and employee input…… what’s that all about?
Yes!!!
Like the frog in the slowly boiling saucepan, the Australian workers have patiently accepted that everything in the garden was rosy, only to wake up and find we are well down the American road and the Australian idea of a “fair go”has disappeared forever.I once had a fair fatherland, it was only a dream.
I was asked a number of years ago what have unions done they are only out for their own interest so i went searching going back to when there was no unions and it was an interesting read of the past, child labor was rife there was no public schools unsafe work conditions even for then was almost the norm and if you were hurt at work you were throne onto the scrap heap and had to beg to survive, unions put pressure on governments to change that, yes there should be a balance between workers, unions and employers. To see how many complain they can not get workers and then you look at the requirements they set down it is almost beyond a joke and when asked why they will not train them they say they end up leaving, if that it the case it makes you question what sort of company they are in the first place. Yes as seen with the rail dispute the government is quick to blame the union as with all disputes and the reports we get in the news of late seems to put the same line, rarely do we get the full story.
These benefits all won by union action and effort to the advantage of workers union or non union.
Annual Leave started in1936 spread through the C of A then came annual leave loading from 1973
Awards integral in ensuring workers get ‘fair pay for a fair day’s work’.
Penalty Rates starting in 1947 for working outside normal hours.
Maternity leave working parents of children born or adopted after 1 January 2011 are entitled to a maximum of 18 weeks’ pay on the National Minimum Wage.
Superannuaion to which prior to 1986, only a select group of workers were entitled.Now it is available for nearly every worker
Equal Pay for Women for women was finally adopt in 1969
Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation This when unions agitated and campaigned for health and safety laws which compelled employers to provide a safe working environment.
Sick leave
Before sick leave, you turned up to work if you were sick, or you went without pay. Sick leave provisions began to appear in awards in the 1920’s and unions have campaigned hard for better sick leave conditions over the years, across all industries.
Long service leave introduced in NSW in 1951. Now C of A wide.
Redundancy pay The Arbitration Commission introduced the first Termination, Change and Redundancy Clause into awards due to work by metalworkers and their union. This entitled workers to redundancy pay.
Allowances: shift allowance, uniform allowance
Unions in different industries have campaigned for allowances that pertain to their members. Many workers who are required to wear uniforms in their jobs, get an allowance for this rather than having to pay for uniforms themselves. Shift allowances are money that’s paid for working at night or in the afternoon. Different industries have different allowances that were won by workers and their unions over the years.
Meal Breaks, rest breaks
Before unions agitated for meal breaks and rest breaks to be introduced, workers were required to work the whole day without a break.
Collective Bargaining
Enterprise Bargaining was introduced in 1996 which allowed workers and their unions to negotiate directly with their employer over pay and conditions. Evidence from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that collective bargaining delivers better wages than individual agreements for ordinary workers.
Unfair Dismissal Protection
Unfair Dismissal Protection came from the concept of a “fair go all round”, after the Australian Workers Union took a case to the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission on behalf of a worker who had bee unfairly sacked in 1971 Since then, unions have campaigned for laws that reflect that ‘fair go’ principle, which is about having a valid reason to sack someone and that the dismissal cannot be harsh, unjust or unreasonable.
Then came the HawKeating plague.
No Howard with a big chip on his shoulder; he opened the door and supported the ascendancy of Koch Network ‘radical right libertarian’ think tanks/demands for LNP policy input and Murdoch sorting out media e.g. blame Labor, unions, Hawke, Keating etc..
Same Howard who celebrated both Brexit and Trump as ‘tremendous news’, and with Covid a ‘black swan event’, claiming not the time for ideology (that he supports), so when is this ideology fit for society? )
I agree, but all these conditions were gained through overt, sometimes violent and ‘illegal’ action back 60 years or more ago. These days almost all action is still illegal and the lines are seldom crossed. All to often these days union bosses do cosy deals with corporations.
Now the Romans in Brian’s life are the equivalent.
Yep. Spot on article. I saw another Labor ‘Quisling’ Craig Emerson on The Drum earlier this week trying to justify his ‘Workchoices lite’ Fair Work Act. Saying that wildcat strike action was the only alternative to this draconian legislation that hobbles trade unions so much they have to give 3 and in some cases 7 day notice to employers of action. This happened while I was in Home Affairs, we were the only section of the gutless scab CPSU that held out against obscene offers of 4% over 3 years with no union representation on management meetings regarding staffing issues. This could mean the use of shorter day 7 day rosters or longer day 12 hour rosters among other things. All our allowances were taken from us. And we had the Public Service Commission headed by a Liberal aparartchik advising government not to give us too much. I always like to embarass Labor traitors on this issue and they get very uncomfortable.
I hate that conservatives in cahoots with big business have across the globe stymied Unions. Unions have helped build a collective bargaining power which have increased wages, made safer working conditions, improved entitlements.
If it were left to the Coalition/big business we’d still be living in the seventies.
“If it were left to the Coalition/big business we’d still be living in the seventies.”
!? In the seventies the unions were in much better shape and the IR laws were much less oppressive. It would be great progress to go back to the seventies and I’m sure the Coalition/big business would prefer to die in a ditch than allow it to happen. And Metal Guru is right, there’s not much sign Labor is different.
OK, I admit defeat.The last (early) century. It will always be regressive regardless and will always favour big business over workers.
I do think though, that people were more feisty in the 50s and 60s. In the face of the sheer number of people (and union bosses) willing to face jail and fines the pollies had to back down. In the 60s women were threatened with fines and even jail for going topless on the beach. Did they back down? No. The number of court case became so large the judges just started throwing the cases out until the laws finally changed. I don’t think that would happen today.
They seem like a different species, hard to believe that they spawned the current lot – mostly their grandkids…
You have to wonder just how bad things have to get with climate change, housing and full time employment to name just a few issues. If anything things have gotten worse over the last 10 years. Successive govts do virtually nothing and no one seems to care.
I took part in industrial action a few years back at a large semi-private HCF.
Management wanted to gut our EB.
The hoops we had to jump through in order to take protected industrial action as extreme as, wait for it, wearing a badge or a non uniform logo t shirt.
A postal ballot of all members requiring an absolute majority, not just a majority of respondents. Postal. You know hard it is to get people to mail things in?
Then the employer applied to terminate our action at the FWC.
They flew in a team of QCs but lost.
Later, they deducted the cost of *their* legal action from the millions of $ of our backpay they’d withheld. No, really.
We voted down 3 successive EB proposals with enormous majorities and they made each offer worse as punishment.
Ultimately, we accepted the 4th proposal, collected our outstanding backpay then resigned en masse and moved to the new public HCF next door, esp after the CEO came to a staff meeting and dared us to.
And the original employer can no longer offer the service we enabled.
Great IR system.
Interesting, but what’s a HCF?
Health Care Facility.
Gotta be a little vague just in case.
In the 50s you guys would have gone on strike and won, why didn’t you?
It’s basically illegal.
Huge fines for individuals, bigger ones for unions.
Employer knew this and gamed it.
This goes to the heart of the problem.
The system is completely tilted to employers.
Consider this. Sophie Mirabella is now a Fair Work commissioner.