You couldn’t get a more appropriate juxtaposition of the cluelessness of our ruling class with the grim reality of the real world than The Australian Financial Review’s Business Summit in Sydney yesterday.
While Scott Morrison dialled in to outline how brilliantly his government was managing things to the assembled economists, business doyens and whichever other suckers had forked out $600 to watch online, and while James Gorman, the Australian head of Morgan Stanley, told the gathering to “get greedy when everybody else is scared… Right now, everybody’s scared — there are opportunities”, the city outside was in chaos.
Not just flooding in outer suburbs, or around major rivers like the Nepean, the Hawkesbury and the Georges, but flooding on major urban infrastructure.
For a time the entire Northern Beaches — from where, undoubtedly, a great many of the great and the good assembled at the Hyatt Regency hailed — was cut off by road. Cars floated on the Roseville Bridge; Manly Vale residents, unaware they were at risk of flooding, were told to evacuate as Manly Dam spilled. The M5 tunnel briefly flooded.
And that was nothing compared with the havoc in areas like Richmond, Windsor and Camden. Which, in turn, was small compared with the disaster inflicted on northern NSW, where residents were still waiting for help to clean up the wreckage of their entire lives.
And Sydney was the second major city to flood after much of Brisbane went under last week.
Morrison’s culpability in climate inaction is well known, but for those who might be fooled by the recent conversion of business to the cause of decarbonisation, it’s best to recall Australia’s big corporations spent many years sabotaging climate action. They’d insist, hand on hearts, that we needed to do something about climate change, but vehemently opposed actual policies that might achieve it.
That’s why they all cheered when Labor’s highly effective and low-impact carbon price was repealed by Tony Abbott. And the Fin, which also professes to support climate action, eagerly provided them with a platform for their sabotage.
Hopefully they glanced out the window yesterday to contemplate the consequences. Hopefully Peter Costello, who chairs the company that owns the Fin, did too.
Costello, who remains Australia’s highest-taxing treasurer, used the summit to urge the government to slash spending. For anyone who recalls the last days of the Howard-Costello government, which perished throwing money at anyone who might vote for it, Costello’s words were risible. But let’s not forget his failure, along with that of John Howard, to do anything on climate change — either emissions abatement or even adaptation investment that might have spared regional communities their current crisis.
That the people who see themselves as Australia’s leadership elite — the politicians, economists, business leaders and senior journalists — sat discussing how it was time to get greedy and how well the government was going, while Australians in regional centres got on with helping one another clean up after a colossal natural disaster because no government help was coming, says all that needs to about the chasm between that elite and the real world the rest of us live in.
And that’s even before you address the obscenity of saying it is time to get greedy while Ukrainians are witnessing their kids die from Russian bombardments.
This is an elite that calls itself leaders but refuses to lead. The prime minister who refuses to govern, likely because he knows when he tries to do anything he stuffs it up. The business community that devotes more effort to using political donations, revolving-door jobs and lobbying to influence policymakers in their own interests than to innovating and responding to community concerns. The dying legacy media that is no longer fit for purpose to serve the public interest but instead a tool for vested interests. The economists who reflexively demand “economic reform” and mass immigration when that simply serves corporate interests.
Accelerating climate change. Aggressive dictators. A pandemic. A retreat from globalisation. Commodity prices soaring. Rearmament. The prospect of stagflation. An ageing population and a dwindling workforce. The economic world is changing rapidly, presenting enormous threats and great opportunities, and a business-as-usual elite, perched above a flooded Sydney, can only think business-as-usual thoughts, chattering to each other inside a five-star, rain-lashed bubble.
For the rest of us in the real world, like the people of northern NSW struggling to clean up after their homes were washed off the map, we’re on our own.
A passionate and necessary article. We certainly are missing a critical MSM, regrettably even the beleaguered ABC. Certainly the print media has veered further right…..
It’s deja vu all over again; The Masque of the Red Death with Prince Prospero and his mates wooping it up in luxury and having a laugh inside his castle, insulated from the plague-ravaged and devastated wasteland outside.
But seriously, what’s the point of accumulating all that wealth and privilege except to lord it over the little people and see them suffer, knowing it does not affect you?
Another parallel is “Last Daze of Pomposity” – apols. to Johnnie Buch/Lord Tweedsmuir, something G/G of Canada.
“The Masque…” ends when the Dancers at the end of their Time take off their masks.
…”Johnnie Buchan/Lord Tweedsmuir, sometime G/G…”
The ‘Captains’ of Industry should be the first shipped out (to the battle zone, of course) whenever we go to war. What a tone deaf meeting of ‘minds’!
Bring on Douglas Adam’s B Ship!!!
How do we get Bernard and Glenn’s “passion” out?
To those who are fixated by Sky News, MSM? The May election stands or falls upon ‘Truth’ or ‘Deception’. Australian democracy survives or collapses, according to how Australia votes.
Yep
My point entirely. One can always hope for the ABC to do it, but given its board and leadership (well stacked), and the diminished funding and fear of more what can you expect?! Hartcher has gone right in SMH. The only one that has veered neutral is Nikki Savva, who when at News was a great apologist for the Murdochracy, but from whom we are now seeing good journalism
Wouldn’t it be refreshing if one of labor’s promises were to include increased funding for the ABC. At very least it could include a real 24 hour news service instead of endless repeats from hours before. Having spent almost a wee without the internet, I hadn’t realised just how bad tv is 5hese days…
Tah-dah!
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-20/labor-pledges-funding-certainty-public-broadcasters-abc-sbs/100636728
$80 something million? Just a pittance and no where near enough! A bit like their housing policy…
But of course! Labor’s cunning plan remains the same as it’s been for decades – aiming to fractionally less bad than the Liberals. So Labor promises a bit more for the ABC, and a few more houses, and slightly more ambition on climate policy, and a little bit of tinkering here, and a small adjustment there…
This provokes the Liberals to move right to open up a gap, and Labor responds by moving right to close the gap again, and the Liberals go further right, and so it goes, on and on…
We’ve reached the point where our brave Labor leader is citing John Howard as an example he intends to follow. How soon Labor will find Tony Abbott is too left-wing I dare not guess.
That John Howard thing never happened, SSR. It was in a (Newscorpse?) headline that Albanese said he’d be more Howard and Hawke than Whitlam, but he never actually mentioned Howard- just Hawke and Whitlam.
I essentially agree with everything else you’ve written, but that Howard thing was a bit of sneaky LNP propaganda, I suspect.
Your crucial, swinging voter is conditioned to see any expenditure by Labor as excessive and indulgent (while the Coalition’s $1tn debt was prudent and necessary).
Let’s just see what happens if Mr Morrison is not returned to the Lodge.
The AFR business summit sounds like a talkfest of elite decision makers, politicians and media enablers, all hell bent on extracting a dividend from the society they live in, oblivious to the widespread damage to infrastructure, environment and community.
Elite is defined as: a group that is superior to the rest in terms of ability or qualities. I am struggling to see how any of them can be described as superior except in their own limited minds.
Quality can be used to mean high social status, and as a collective noun for such persons, even if that is rather obsolete usage; elite and upper class are given as synonyms in thesauri.
NO NO NO! You’ve got the definition of elite completely wrong. Elites are people who actually think, and can imagine a world where governments serve the people who voted for them, and economies are built so that everyone has a fair go. These poor people are hard done by battlers, who are just trying to scrape a few pennies together.
If the whole lot of them were swallowed by a black hole would we miss them or would our society be damaged?
if all the stuff they had accumulated were put into consolidated revenue, wouldn’t that give them the willies, the country would emerge better off.
Oh for goodness sake Crikey, I got modded for describing the business elites as bunch or w***ers, while an article by Michael Bradley is sprinkled with the f word! Some consistency please.
The consistency is: one standard for published articles, another for comments below the line. It was ever thus.
Often even copying the header, or bits from an article, into comments is disappeared.