The pace is really picking up in Labor’s preselection wars, thrown into public visibility by the sudden death of senator Kimberley Kitching. Had that not occurred, the public would be hearing a few mumblings about the efforts to remove an obscure senator — Kitching — as a sideshow to the real deal of toppling Victorian socialist Left titan Kim Carr.
Were Kitching still in place, her faction — run by Bill Shorten — through their complicit propagandists in the mainstream media would still have pulled the stops out to ward off threats to their position, spinning out a media campaign about their wholesome, mainstream, religious conservative senator, under attack from shadowy progressive elites within the party. That would have stayed within the loose bounds of public waging of internal factional war, make your play, don’t frighten the horses, etc.
Instead Kitching’s death took the process to Defcon One. The sudden vacancy in the Senate list meant that the Shorten/AWU group wasn’t defending an incumbent member, it was fighting for a plum seat up for grabs. A safe Labor Senate seat in Victoria? You could ease your bum into the red benches and not be moved for decades.
So the Shorten group campaign went into absolute overdrive, with any consideration of wider electoral damage thrown to the winds.
The campaign to portray Kitching’s death as due to “bullying”, and the demand for an internal inquiry, was the Shorten faction’s equivalent of robbing a bank with a bomb strapped to your chest: one move and we all go up. Dozens of columnists in News Corp, Nine and even the ABC were happy to lend their bit of support to the push.
That may well have been a success, though at a heavy cost, with news that the party centre — the Feds who took over the Victorian branch after revelations of Adem Somyurek’s branch stacking — may acquiesce in permitting the vacancy caused by Kitching’s death to be filled by a member of the Shorten/AWU faction. The name of Victorian Youth Crime and Corrections Minister Natalie Hutchins is being bandied about.
Really, the “National Left”/Conroyite Right alliance that now runs the joint would like to install one of its own. It’s a tantalising chance to further marginalise the Shorten/AWU headbangers who have been responsible for more mayhem and bad press for Labor over the past 20 years than all the other factions put together. It knows now that this grouping will absolutely trash the campaign if it has to in fighting for its survival — but may be sufficiently mollified.
But that may not be enough for other elements in Kitching’s support base — the pro-US defence establishment, headed by ASPI, the warmongering lobby group founded by the Department of Defence under John Howard and now funded by major defence contractors; the armaments industry lobby; and the Australian Zionist lobby.
For all three Kitching was a godsend — a senator with DLP/SDA union geopolitics but situated in the more mainstream, less crazy Shorten/AWU faction.
For a moment during the funeral I had a Pynchonesque vision of actual missiles and bunker buster bombs sitting in the pews, weeping into handkerchiefs at the departed.
The war lobby has always mobilised against left-wing elements in Labor governments — even the centrist left outfit that Albanese’s “National Left” has become. But now it may be more concerned by the rise of the Conroyite Right (still called that, even though Stephen Conroy is in the gaming lobby, fighting the scourge of working-class gambling addiction from the inside) since it is moving further away from Cold War right positions.
Thus it was that South Australian Senator Don Farrell suddenly popped up as a “friend and mentor” of Kitching in the public prints. Farrell is an SDA faction boss, and as an SA senator, pretty much a representative of the armaments industry, on which that parched, perpetually desperate state depends. His statement that Kitching “would have won preselection” — rolled out on Sky News and dutifully stenographised by Guardian Australia without contextualising his factional role, presumably through simple ignorance — was simply a statement of claim to the seat from outside the core of Shorten’s faction on behalf of the foreign-policy right.
These groupings may be satisfied with someone like Hutchins in the Senate spot, but one group who could be keen to continue the party war is the Right’s Zionist lobby that petrified of any loss of position within an Albanese government. Thus the story in today’s Age, in which David Crowe’s article has “friend” of Kitching Michael Danby continuing to push for an inquiry within the party, weeks out from an election.
So this is another example of Gay Alcorn’s Age simply transmitting right-wing propaganda by omission, because while Danby is undoubtably championing the memory of his late friend, they weren’t exactly crochet buddies. Danby is the prime mover of the Zionist lobby within Labor; Kitching was its rock-solid ally, and the lobby would be worried about positions an Albanese government might take on Israel/Palestine once in office.
By any reasonable measure, it needn’t. Any fully militant pro-Palestinian position is largely gone from Labor. But Israel’s periodic Gaza mayhem is losing global support fast. The next invasion, post-Ukraine, may attract sanctions. The Zionists would be desperate to make sure that an Albanese government would hold the line — and if it can’t guarantee that, it will help Morrison win another term.
In parallel with all that, Carr fights to keep his seat, and to keep a nationalist social democratic industry policy on the table. But he’s doing that within bounds, you might say.
These other punks? They will trash their own party right up to election day if they need to, draw on any ally they can find, no matter how sleazy, and will keep on doing it until people within the party have the courage to publicly call them out, and name names. Now, not after yet another close, “Oh no, what happened?” defeat. Otherwise the promised land will be as far away as ever, and there will be more years for the locust.
if these a***holes cause another term for SloMo they will rightly be consigned to the lowest reaches of hell.
They had it won , then stumbled and stumbled , who wins .
The ALP is flawed but it is our only hope of a slightly saner and more equal Australia. How do we stop this egotistical idiots from spoiling it for us? Shame too on Sam Maiden for leading the media onslaught.
You see the ALP as a glass half full and the coalition as a glass half empty.
Have you considered the possibility of observer bias?
Have you considered the possibility that your choices arise not because of virtue, intelligence, or righteousness, but through circumstances and interests?
Have you considered forming a sentence that has any substance?
On Twitter a year or so ago someone asked who is the best Australian writer about the larger context of Australian politics. It was in the context of the class analysis (in certain online ‘communities’) coming out of the 2020 US election. I answered Guy Rundle. These articles this last week have shown again that Guy doesn’t have an equal in reporting on the forces at play for power in this country.
His cheque is, STB, in the mail – better cash it quickly.
This type of shtik has a shorter half life than prawn heads in the sun.
When John Howard fan girl, Niki Savva, comes up with one of the best columns about the Labor Unity KK crap show it just goes to show you the sad state of Australian journalism.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-kitching-saga-is-one-stoush-the-pm-should-have-resisted-20220323-p5a71a.html
I have been greatly enlightened by Guy and Crikey over the past few days.
My takeaway – the era of trusting media or political brands is over.
I no longer have faith in the The Guardian let alone The Age / SMH (with the exception of a handful of their better non-stenographers – Nick McKenzie, Ross Gittins etc). I was well aware of the cynical Shoppies campaign against Same Sex Marriage, but I no longer trust that the right faction operatives of Labor are any different to the self serving nutters in the Coalition. Bill Shorten’s retirement (to big pharma, gaming, military, mining – lets see) should be met with glee.
Forget Guardian. That self-proclaimed source of hard hitting, investigative journalism is more interested in their journos maintaining friendly relations to the politicians than doing their job. If you ever listened to Katharine Murphy’s ‘interviews’ with the likes of Falinski, Littleproud or Zimmerman you know what I’m talking about. It’s effing hopeless and really not worth the subscription fees.
Guardian has no interest in its subscribers. I am so sick of the endless guilting “you have read 37 articles in the last month” and pleas to become a supporter. I paid $10 a month for several years and STILL got these messages and couldn’t get anyone at the Guardian to answer an email or the phone (laughably when I actually found a contact number for their switchboard I was told that both (sic) their customer service staff were at lunch). When I cancelled my subscription I chose “the Guardian does not value its supporters” as my reason. Did anyone follow up? Not on your nellie. It may sound trivial but I believe that this culture reflects the disconnection of Guardian from its customers and frankly anyone who isn’t a journalist. So disappointing because they are capable of much more.
Fits with their treatment of Assange.
Not just the Guardian’s treatment of Assange. Not a peep out of Crikey over the latest ruling against Assange.
Yes, but Guardian used Assange to win awards and now behaves… well, it’s the equivalent of Peter’s “I don’t know him”, isn’t it? Wherever you look, our world seems to be steeped in hypocrisy and self-interest. It makes me ill. Physically, mentally… I’m exhausted, anxious and depressed… we’re so forked…
I just wish they’d put the Guardian behind a paywall so I didn’t have the choice to read their infuriating and hypocritical third way garbage.
I have long felt that political journalists are more interested in the sport of politics than policy or actual governing. Any sideshow like this is meat and drink to their navel-gazing articles. But it has real consequences for the Australians suffering under this callous, cruel and selfish government.
They all think they are down at the pub after another insightful university lecture plotting the overthrow of the Menzies government, i’m sure it’s the old Trot’s versus the other side.
I want a change in government, and believe that Albo and the team have what it takes, but these people need to understand that as much as we hate the LNP feathering the pockets of their benefactors, we don’t want teenage university politics ruining our country
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0BpfwazhUA
I would not be surprised if Labor is a victim of divide and conquer tactics by foreign interference to ensure it does not gain power. The ASPI/US connections with the factions that by their behaviour seem determined for Labor to score own goals is highly suspicious. The CIA/NED are artful masters of white anting political parties all over the world that displease them.
The Klaxon website has an update today on the timing and the how & why KK asked ‘those’ questions to Ms Holgate. The ASIC scandal (remember the two guys at the top authorising their own expenses to the tune of over $300k) that was about to blow the next day. The ANAO had been rattling the cage containing Fberg, ASIC and others about the matter for months!. Morrison needed a distraction hence KK questions to Holgate and Morrison’s ‘outraged performance’ within 1 hour in the House of Reps. The USA dark forces have a long history of undermining workers and their unions. KK would appear to be an example of foreign interference aimed at ‘our government’. The irony of her ‘outing’ a Chinese person under parliamentary privilege is not lost on me.
The PM is talking up nuclear subs and here’s the ALP having a core meltdown. Hopeless.
Is the ALP having a “core meltdown”?
Or has a 52 year old woman who was embroiled in the same kinds of organisational factionalism that other parties, such as NSW Liberals for example, engage in every day, suffered a cardiac event which unexpectedly shone a light in the direction of her husband’s faction’s opportunity?
Surely it would need to have a “…a core..” for that to be true – I have been unable to discern anything worth a pinch of the proverbial since the HawKeating regime wrenched the heart out of the party and made the electorate safe for the Rodent.
Whether the ALP is having a “core meltdown” or not is immaterial to the next election. The majority of voters aren’t interested in internal fighting, and anyway it’s being reported as bullying by a number of ALP women to another of their kind, unlike sexual misconduct within the LNP. Morrison has already lost many of the swinging voters from the last election. And governments lose elections, oppositions don’t win elections.