data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce00a/ce00a24c2b9c480230b3d48bb6c7488f97310b9e" alt=""
You can blame factional brawling and litigious former members if you like, but anything that goes wrong with last-minute NSW Liberal candidates is entirely the fault of Scott Morrison.
He’s the one who allowed his minion Alex Hawke to completely wreck the NSW preselection process because greater party democracy threatened Hawke. He’s the one who presided over the bizarre situation where his ministers faced disendorsement because they’d lost control of their branches. He’s the one who couldn’t call the election until last weekend because he was too busy wasting taxpayer money fighting his own party in the courts.
And he’s the one who picked Katherine Deves in Warringah in Sydney to take on Zali Steggall.
Readers with long memories might recall Morrison passive-aggressively trying to get Gladys Berejiklian to run there, before backgrounding against her (again) when she declined. Indeed any number of candidates, some of high quality, have put their hands up to run in Warringah. But Morrison put Deves in.
Deves is now shaping up as 2022’s Pauline Hanson.
Those with even longer memories might recall how the long national nightmare that is Hanson began when Hanson, then an Ipswich nonentity, was preselected in Oxley by the Queensland Liberals in 1996. She made racist comments about Indigenous Australians and was disendorsed after some media pressure on John Howard but too late for ballot papers to be changed. Hanson duly won and the rest is a particularly sordid piece of history.
According to Deves, trans kids have been “surgically mutilated and sterilised”. She claims to have been “triggered” by the rainbow flag because it meant LGBTIQA+ people were “demanding” something (and to think it’s usually conservatives mocking how progressives are “triggered”). Days that celebrate LGBTIQA+ Australians are “grooming”, which is designed to “capture children and adolescents as profit centres by promoting hormonal and surgical gender transition”. The comments were made on now-deleted online posts.
Remember this is Morrison’s own pick for the seat after he deliberately allowed NSW preselections to be blocked.
Initially Morrison thought Deves’ views on trans people in sport could be exploited for culture war purposes. “She’s standing up for things that she believes in, and I share her views on those topics,” Morrison said. “This is just about, you know, common sense and what’s right. And I think Katherine’s right on the money there.”
By yesterday Deves was toxic enough for Morrison to no longer “share her views on these topics”. “They’re not views that I was aware of,” he said about her deleted claims. Steggall and others are calling for Deves’ disendorsement.
Warringah is no Oxley, and the Liberals are even less likely to regain it, but it reflects on the mess that Morrison created. Checking on Deves’ record of public comments was basic due diligence, which apparently wasn’t done — or if it was done Morrison’s team was so desperate to find someone with a pulse to stand that they ignored it.
The circumstances of another last-minute nomination also came back to bite Morrison yesterday, with questions about the Rheem factory he’d visited on Tuesday to launch the campaign of Parramatta candidate Maria Kovacic, which The Canberra Times revealed was sacking workers and offshoring production. Morrison’s campaign team should have avoided it like the plague.
So far the focus has all been on Labor’s stumbles, but Morrison — who is offering nothing by way of new policy — has had his own problems. If Labor was running a tighter ship, the scrutiny would be a lot more uncomfortable for the prime minister.
And what else is yet to come to light from Deves?
Editor’s note: Deves penned a column about trans athletes at the Olympics for Crikey last year. Here is a link.
If
Labor was running a tighter shipMurdoch wasn’t running the media, the scrutiny would be a lot more uncomfortable for the prime minister.There, fixed it for you.
“If Labor was running a tighter ship, the scrutiny would be a lot more uncomfortable for the prime minister.”
It matters little how tight a ship the ALP is running. Scomo will always be under less scrutiny than Albo.
“If Labor was running a tighter ship, the scrutiny would be a lot more uncomfortable for the prime minister.”
If Labor was pure gold they’d still be called iron pyrite
Disappointing perception from Bernard that Labor has no vision: what is electrifying the nation, full employment, national reconstruction via govt investment in manufacturing and new industry (like 1945-9 and the Hawke years) or is that too industrial and mundane for inner city intellectuals. What about a ‘care-led recovery’ – boring because you don’t need care yet. Or free and expanded TAFE for the future of work. Or the social housing build because home ownership is not longer the Australian dream. Or tackling insecure work with regulation, as we do in Victoria – eg wage theft as a crime, sick leave for casuals. Our refugee policy is identical to the Greens except we would turn back boats – but Labor would also work on a global off short processing program because the refugee crisis is epic and will only get worse. Meanwhile asylum seekers arrive in numbers by air, and are left to rot on TPVs and go under the radar as sweated, undocumented workers – for years and years, Even all this detail it seems, is too hard for journalists to absorb. Stop treating us like children please.
Yes I was also very disappointed with the critical thrust on Labor in this issue. They have always had more vision than LNP, by definition. Let’s hope the positive to come out of this negativity is indeed a sharpening up on the stump. I heard Katy G on this morning – she’s top value, as are some of the other Labor people. How about some media reporting on positive policies from both sides. I suspect there are few from LNP (apart from tax cuts and give-aways, rorts and election bribes.
I’d bet Rome to a dollar this controversy was exactly what the Libs wanted when they preselected her. Fires up the base without having to run with it in the official policy platform.
You mean like: “I’ve misplaced my dog whistle – may I borrow yours?”
Surely, given his well known cowardice, it is more “I’ve misplaced my dog whistle so please blow yours as loudly as you can!”?
Very apt.
Agreed, well done.
I think you may well be right.