On day one of the campaign, Scott Morrison penned an article to mark the start of the official 2022 federal election campaign: “This election is a clear choice.”
The piece — nearly identical to prepared remarks he gave at a press conference that day — was published to the prime minister’s 620,000-odd followers on the professional social network LinkedIn.
When talking about social media and elections, platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and TikTok get all the shine. LinkedIn, however, could play its part in influencing millions of Australians who use the Microsoft-owned platform — and on it, Morrison has a significant edge over Anthony Albanese.
LinkedIn is tight-lipped about the number of Australian users. In 2013 it celebrated 5 million; more recently a report from We Are Social and Hootsuite said that 26% of Australians aged 16 to 64 used the platform, just behind Twitter (29.5%) and in front of Reddit (22.6%). In short, it’s a huge platform that doesn’t get the attention others get. And according to a University of Canberra report, a quarter of those users use it to get news.
Demographics aren’t public, but it’s believed LinkedIn’s demographics skew towards young professionals who use the platform primarily as a digital CV and networking platform.
In terms of functionality, LinkedIn is similar to Facebook. Users have an account, they can follow or connect with other users (following is a one-way relationship) and accounts. There’s a feed of updates from accounts and users you follow as well as some suggested by the algorithm.
Over his time as prime minister, Morrison has cultivated an enormous following on the platform, giving the Liberal Party of Australia a significant “LinkedIn advantage” as it blasts campaign messages several times a week to hundreds of thousands of voters. His posts always have thousands of engagements, and top posts have tens of thousands of likes and comments. It’s fair to assume that each of these posts is getting tens of thousand of views as he promotes campaign stops and shares political advertisements.
Meanwhile, Albanese is nowhere to be seen. He has no LinkedIn account. The Labor Party has a page that’s only been used a few times in the past year.
Personal profile analytics aren’t publicly available, so there’s no way to further benchmark Morrison’s account performance. But the Liberal Party is also outperforming the Australian Labor Party’s LinkedIn page — although on a smaller scale. The Liberal page has three times as many followers as its opposition, 15,560. It’s gained about three times as many during the past year (adding 994 to Labor’s 271) and posting 104 times in the year compared with just 11 from Labor.
Although the typical LinkedIn demographic — young white-collar workers — may naturally skew towards the Liberal Party, Albanese and Labor’s limited presence cedes the ground to Morrison’s team to freely post content that’s curated for a specific audience.
During an election campaign when every eyeball is hard fought (or bought, in the case of advertising), LinkedIn — where Morrison can speak directly to voters without competition — is a digital advantage for the government.
Are you being bombarded with political ads on social media? If so, do they work for you? Let us know your thoughts by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.
This is just the LNP preaching to their base. If you are inclined to “follow” ScoMo on Linkedin then you are already an LNP voter. Personally, I unfollow / unconnect (whetever the term is ) anyone i see that likes one of Scumo’s posts. You can learn a lot about soemone by the posts they like or people they follow.
Following political accounts on Linkedin is an interesting career strategy
LinkedIn is a business/career/professional networking tool although I agree with Bearthetoot’s analysis that Linkedin has gone downhill big time – I stopped my renewal earlier this year….
I despise people that use it as a political messaging tool.
Well done to Labor for not using it – Morrison talks at people regardless of the platform and is well known for not reading the room
I get what you are saying, but LinkedIn has really gone down hill in the last 5+ years. It has moved away from being a source for professionals to connect to just another platform for individuals or groups to push there own agendas from right wing conspiracies, to anti vaxxers/lockdown to someone trying to sell you the latest and greatest software.
“LinkedIn is going downhill” Probably, but that’s a side issue. 620,000 followers on a platform that is going downhill is better than no followers on the slickest, best, up-and-coming platform in existence.
From drilling into the link mentioned:
The figures we report for social media users rely heavily on advertising reach data published by social media platforms
No conflict of interest in these figures then!