Award-winning science journalist Dyani Lewis is the author of Unvaxxed: Trust, truth and the rise of vaccine outrage, the second book in The Crikey Read series by Crikey and Hardie Grant Books. It is now available to purchase.
It’s been three months since Unvaxxed was whisked off to the printers. In that time it seems as though everything — and almost nothing — has changed. The federal election has been and gone, international travel has become a thing again, and people are still bruised from the body blows that COVID-19 has inflicted — and continues to inflict.
One of the harshest blows that the pandemic delivered is the realisation that people near and dear to us view the world through a distorted lens. Conversations about Unvaxxed reinforce what I already discovered through personal experience and reporting: everyone knows someone who has decided to remain unvaxxed against COVID-19. There is overwhelming evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and protect us from the worst that the virus can throw at us. And yet this is not how everyone sees it. The world the unvaxxed inhabit is often a dog-eat-dog world of deception, power-hungry governments, and profit-driven pharmaceutical companies.
Thankfully, the 2022 federal election results reveal that, by and large, Australians rejected the pleas of anti-vax activist groups to vote out the major parties in favour of “freedom-fighting” fringe groups that played to these fears.
In Victoria — the state that was repeatedly plunged into lengthy periods of lockdown by its Labor government — people turned emphatically to that party’s federal counterparts and climate-focused independents. Western Australians, derided by federal Coalition politicians for wanting to remain disease-free in their “hermit kingdom”, also swung to Labor.
One reading of the situation is that voters in those states supported the restrictions placed on them. But I think there’s an even more hopeful way to view the election results. Pandemic issues that once seemed so urgent and volatile — whether schools should open, whether booster shots should be mandated — have receded from public consciousness to a degree. Other, more urgent concerns, such as climate change and our nation’s energy future, have reclaimed their spot at the top of our priorities.
Politicians who (perhaps cynically) figured that they could ride the wave of outrage from people unable to get a haircut or grab a coffee at their local café were undoubtedly disappointed by the election results. Fear-mongering text messages about vaccine-adverse events that were sent on behalf of Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party failed to win the party a single seat in the House of Reps.
But this doesn’t mean that vaccine outrage is a problem of the past. The unvaxxed remain a minority in Australia — less that 5% of people aged over 16 are unvaccinated against COVID-19. But their presence in our lives is both universal and universally perplexing. Why do people get duped by misinformation, why do others seek to dupe them, and what can we do to protect ourselves and others from the inexorable rise of misinformation?
Vaccine outrage is a canary in the coal mine. It erupted into a festering sore last year because the conditions were ripe — the pandemic sowed uncertainty and upended people’s lives. But it is also a symptom of a deeper syndrome afflicting our community: a growing mistrust in government and the institutions that keep us safe and healthy. Restoring public trust does more than combat vaccine refusal. It restores our faith in community. And reaching out to wayward friends with understanding and compassion will welcome them back into that community, too.
I like the idea of understanding and compassion Dyani – we haven’t seen too much of it around here.even. I didn’t have one person chastise the bloke who wished I was dead here in Crikey’s comments. Tells you something hey? The thing is, it has to be an authentic desire to understand others, whatever the issue – whether that’s about these particular vaccines or politics – not just the words or the faint hearted philosophy, because we know the difference. Force and coercion and demonising others are the antithesis to trust, understanding and compassion. Mandates didn’t just boot all trust out the window and create adversaries unnecessarily, they were plain dumbassery that was always going to have devastating effects, not the least was a huge rise in the very real physical damage caused by the Nocebo Effect.
I sat outside Dan Andrews office for a day with five non conflict ideas that would have increased vaccination rates dramatically and couldn’t get anyone to even listen to them. Well one staffer did make promises to listen if I left, but didn’t – gee someone in politics lied again, what a surprise!
I also think you and other political commentators have made a big mistake in assuming that anti mandate sentiment is on the wane because of the lack of success of the right wing parties who jumped on the anti-mandate sentiment. We never were right wing in the first place that’s why we didn’t vote for them. It was the MEDIA that lumped everyone together as right wing, violent crackpots. They lumped people who were genuinely anti all vaccinations, together with people who were anti THESE vaccinations, together with people who cheerfully had a vaccination but were passionately against mandates, together with the construction workers who were livid about the arbitrary shutting down of their industry for two weeks for no good reason except some kind of testosterone exercise, together with some mischief makers and then labelled us all right wing. You were all plain wrong.
So.coming back to the subject of increasing trust in government and the drug companies who make the vaccines – they’ll need to put their actions where their mouth is.
And understanding and compassion? I look forward to it.
What you actually are is falling for libertarian far right propaganda. You’re are far, far worse than right wing.
Ahhh you’re my friend VJ aren’t you? The one I keep giving a hug to?
OK VJ somewhere else here I asked what made you happy and offered to go first if you’d like me to. Then I realized that you might have thought it was some kind of adversarial trap, so I decided to come back and go first. My grandkids make me happy. One was born just before the first lockdown and was deep in every lockdown thereafter, so we only saw him maybe three times in his first two years. Thank god for video calls. The super teary eyed super happiness comes every time I think of the day, maybe his third visit here after the restrictions were lifted and not that long ago, when he ran from the car calling “Nanna!” I really had thought that kind of closeness wasn’t going to be possible with this one.
My other grandkids make me happy too. I have two that have had a really rough time in their parents breakup, with every excuse for bad behavior of which there was lots of acting out. Super happiness again watching them change that and be so gentle and considerate with the horses, as they learn to communicate with them and understand their feelings around them.
My vegie garden brings me happiness at all the stages from getting the beds built up and ready to plant, to the riot of growing things that I like to “crowd plant”, to the cooking and eating. Cooking and eating brings me happiness.
My work brings me happiness. The writing at 4am when the world is still and my brain runs free. The looks on clients faces when they have an ahhaa moment that releases their old fears and traumas, the emails filled with wonder at lives changed, even the hiccups and road blocks and steps backwards make me happy when people have reached out to tell me about it.
My animals bring me happiness. The dogs, the cats, the chickens, but specially the horses – those incredibly powerful gentle animals who are so freaking sentient when they’re not afraid. People think they’re dumb animals – I often say that we humans aren’t too smart when we’re afraid either.
The bush brings me happiness – the smell of it,the feel of it, the sound of it, the animals in it, everything about it. The ocean likewise, the emptier the beach the better.
I didn’t feel much understanding and compassion coming from the 5% who wanted to cheerfully spread the virus around the community, and demanded that the 95% of us who understood the science around masks and social distancing should just stay home forever (as opposed to a short lockdown period to quell the spread, and then freedom for all).
I don’t see much compassion and understanding for the immuno-compromised and their families, who are still restricted to their homes, because society is too selfish to adopt a practice that has been widespread in Asia for decades, of covering your mouth and nose during periods of high infection.
Masking (and quarantine and social distancing) to reduce disease spread is one thing and vaccination for Covid-19 is another. Most of the people dying of Covid in Australia here in mid-2022 have been at least double-vaccinated. And quite a few are dying of Covid vaccines – a cause of death labeled as “mysterious” Sudden Adult Death Syndrome to divert our attention from the cause lying in the reduced effectiveness of the body’s immune system.
SADS has been documented for 10 years or more. It didn’t suddenly appear with the covid vaccines.
“Most of the people dying of Covid in Australia here in mid-2022 have been at least double-vaccinated.” What counts is the rate of death for the two cohorts, and the unvaccinated die at a higher rate.
The picture is the same for rate of death:
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/09/covid-vaccine-causing-sudden-adult-death-syndrome/
Not a reliable news site. It’s got some really unsubstantiated rubbish onboard.
This paper is not “unsubstantiated rubbish”. It uses NHS data.
Then there is this – from tenured academic scientists from around the world:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239
The failure of governments, journalists and the majority of doctors to engage with the overwhelming evidence that is in direct contradiction to the “safe and effective” mantra is staggering.
That is a function of arithmetic. If 90% are vaxxed there will more of them dying.
Not if the vaccine prevents or significantly reduces deaths.
Ergo?
Do the names Fauci or Trudeau (x4!) suggest anything?
No, but the incidence has rocketed.
I can’t imagine how much stress you’re under being immuno-compromised in a pandemic and still feeling restricted to your home despite four + vaccinations. I have a friend whose immune system is stuffed and I’d cheerfully wear a mask if it made them feel more secure. Have you tried asking the people you’d like to be around, i.e. visiiting friends and family, to wear a mask?
It’s not just friends – it’s going anywhere – shopping, haircuts, healthcare (some do require masks) movies, classes, travel, etc etc ie normal life.
I’m not immuno-compromised. I wear a mask for others.
Plus the more we spread the virus around, the more variants develop.
I appreciate your comments trying to clarify misinformation.
And the more people develop immunity naturally.
Agribiz knows full well, given the last 50yrs experience, that the more toxic the herb/insecticide the more quickly resistant strains develop and the bigger the profit margins – just not that of farmers.
Similarly BigPharma with this human equivalent.
Some of us used to say that monthly ‘boosters’ were a’coming but it is not longer a sick joke.
There is a report from Pfizer to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) detailing the adverse reactions to its vaccine over the first three months of its use (December 2019-February 2020).
https://web.archive.org/web/20220125002422/https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Pfizer advised the FDA of 1223 deaths associated with the use of their vaccine (p 7):
How can the 1223 deaths (let alone the 42,086 total adverse reactions reported by Pfizer over the three months) be compatible with the description of this vaccine as “safe”?
Suggest that people should read a number of articles associated with this paper. Search PF-07302048 (BNT162B2). It has been the source of a number of misrepresented claims.
I have searched, but find only “fact checks” about deaths of pregnant women, nothing on the 1223 total deaths and 42,086 adverse reactions. Can you send me (us?) a link – at least as credible as documentation filed by Pfizer?
Yeah I looked it up too and it was only debunking the claim that pregnant women were losing their babies at the rate of 87.5% after vaccination. The stats were (in the Reuters fact check) “impossible to calculate the percentage of pregnant women who reported an adverse effect or, in this case, had a spontaneous abortion following vaccination compared to a larger total.”
So basically they didn’t know…
’How can 1233 deaths (…over three months) be compatible with the description of this vaccine as ‘safe’?
What is even more astonishing, is that Pfizer attempted to impose a 75 year timeline on the release of the FDA trial data you reference.
Fortunately, the attempt by Pfizer to ensure the data remained ‘unavailable’ was successfully overturned by an FOI lawsuit, instigated by a coalition of doctors and scientists in the US in January 2022.
Open and transparent? No
Safe and effective? No
Maybe you missed this bit:
‘An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication’
Does this apply to all 42,086 of them? And the 1223 deaths?
I looked for an explanation on the Pfizer website and the FDA website. There may be one posted, but I can’t find it. Can you?
Or do I need to wait to read Dyani Lewis’ book? I’m sure she will have covered this major driver of vaccine skepticism with the sort of directness and lack of evasion that we need.
It means exactly what it says. Use some common sense.
Are you are saying that they don’t know the cause of the 1223 deaths and 42,086 adverse reactions. Maybe all were caused by the vaccine; maybe none were. They don’t know – and apparently find it uninteresting and not worth pursuing. “Move along, nothing to see here”.
What sort of a drug trial is that?
Donald Trump didn’t want his MAGA mob to know that he was subsequently vaccinated.
That’s important.
Similarly the PHONie who claimed to be unvaxxed.
Until contracting a ‘very mild’ case in early May.
Unless it was simply a ploy for the sympathy vote that finally put her ahead of Stoker.
I guess they made enough profits to cover their 2.3 billion dollar fine by the US government for fraudulent behavior a few years earlier? But sure… trust them.
The anti vaxx movement brought together a diverse list of other anti establishment groups:
Things like Sovereign Citizens, but mainly Conspiracy theorists who found people willing to accept conspiracies based on often discredited information. Lets face it, in almost every sphere of life, and especially Science, there will always be a few dissenting voices, and Covid gave light to a lot of misinformation and skewed opinion.
Justin Trudeau is enjoying his third bout of covid, thanks to his previous FIVE shots and Fauci, surely someone fully dosed, is also now crook.
Oddly, the meeja in the UK & here is no longer reporting cases/deaths/vax status – presumably because ‘privacy’ – in that handy little strap which was such a feature for the last 2yrs in the Grauniad.
Denmark has ceased all covid vaxxing and the cries for Mandates have gone silent in France & Austria (in the latter the legislation passed months ago but never enforced).
Sweden looks on bemused, having barely disturbed its usual stolid equanimity, at the entire farrago of lockdowns, disruption and authoritarian overreach that have devastated the Continent which condemned that country as feckless and a threat to the obedient.
Meanwhile Bozo has finally yielded to demands for an enquiry into vaccine injuries/deaths, possibly because the compensation scheme – set up along with the vaxprog – has yet to pay out a zac.
Can’t imagine why there is “…a growing mistrust in government and the institutions that keep us safe and healthy.”.
Because they do neither? Just guessin’ mind.
Presume no more, o you of the overwrought prose. The Guardian still publishes that info, the only problem being it takes a few clicks.
Why would that be?
The slippery slope to the Memory Hole?
“Oddly, the meeja in the UK & here is no longer reporting cases/deaths/vax status”
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-17/coronavirus-cases-data-reveals-how-covid-19-spreads-in-australia/12060704
Heavens a lot of Crokey readers are antivaxxers.
In a parallel universe with Putin admirers, climate science deniers….. nativist and radical right libertarian sentiments.
Lol! Either you didn’t read the comments or your tongue is firmly in your cheek. I’ll choose the tongue in the cheek Michael. Or do you want a hug too?
I’m reminded of my daughter’s advice to me, many years ago, when I complained that a friend was spoiling our relationship because of his need to turn every subject into a debate about climate change (ie his non-belief).
“You will never convince him, Mum, because you only want to debate with facts, and he will never convince you, because you only want to debate with facts “
It’s not truth that governs human behaviour but belief.
Religion being the prime example – demonstrable B/S which has, nonetheless, been the prime mover since the Bronze Age.
I’m always happy to change my beliefs when the facts prove me wrong. Or in the case of religion, based on the likelihood. 😉
…whoooosh…