Australian users of TikTok are officially on notice: the Chinese government can, if they wanted, find out their location, email, phone number and what videos they watch on the short video platform.
This is the logical conclusion of an admission by TikTok Australia to opposition spokesperson for cyber security and countering foreign interference James Paterson. Responding to the senator’s letter asking whether Chinese staff could still access the data of users outside of China, TikTok Australia director of public policy Brent Thomas confirmed that Australian data could be accessed by users “wherever they’re based” even though it’s stored on servers in Singapore and the US.
The letter notes that Australian data has never been given to the Chinese government and that there are limits on which staff can access data. Despite the existence of China’s national intelligence law that requires any person or organisation to assist in state intelligence-gathering, TikTok Australia’s qualifications do nothing to dispel the threat that the Chinese government could get its hands on it in the future.
This revelation has been front-page news in Australia’s major news publications. But how are users of the platform reacting to this information? Some of TikTok’s big creators told Crikey that they weren’t leaving anytime soon.
Joel Kandiah is a creator from Perth whose @thehistoryofmoney account has grown to more than 113,000 followers. He’s concerned about the news but says he doesn’t think TikTok’s data-harvesting practices are any different to Facebook’s, Apple’s or Google’s.
“The moment you use any app that has access to your data, it’s going to be compromised regardless of where they’re from,” he said in a message.
Kandiah believes that individual users have a responsibility to be careful about how they use technology and the consequences of that use.
Freelance model and activist Stephanie account has more than 130,000 followers, shares a similar stance on using TikTok because she believes other social media platforms are just as bad.
Like many other creators, Stephanie has accounts with most major social media players. But she’s unusually privacy conscious and aware of ad-tech surveillance: “I used to just get cash out and not have Flybuys because I didn’t want anyone knowing what products I liked.”
Now, Stephanie is resigned to the fact that tech companies are harvesting users’ data, and will continue to use the app.
Miles Glaspole runs the @TikTok10quiz account where he runs a daily quiz show for his 615,000 followers. Despite professing to not know much about TikTok’s data practices, Glaspole tells me his time working for an ad agency gave him a rare insight into how user data can be used to profile and target advertising.
“The fact that they can pick up you’re a 40-something, Liberal-voting, caravan-owning, aspiring juggler from the inner west was mind-blowing to a young politics grad at the time,” he said.
He says that the age group who are most likely to use TikTok are “way past caring” about who’s got their data because they can’t do anything about it.
“Our privacy’s already gone,” he said in a message. “May as well spend time on an app we enjoy.”
The fact that the data was stored in the US and Singapore means that it is subject to the laws of those countries. In the case of the US, the NSA already has it and the Singapore Constitution does not include a right to privacy and the data protection act does not protect citizens from government-sanctioned surveillance.
In other words, big deal. It was available to foreign governments long ago.
Paterson is still crying wolf!!!
The fact that Paterson is involved means that I do not take any notice at all
I’d be more worried about crooks and fraudsters getting my data.
How sad that they just accept they don’t have, and maybe never have had, any privacy. Its a short road to Logan’s Run, Soylent Green, etc.
Mmm… which security services are more likely to be interested in me? Which security services are more likely to hurt me? Well not so much the Chinese I would have thought. Yes they are a brutal dictatorship but they are mainly about oppressing their own.
As to commercial and state compromises of my privacy and using insights into my behaviour against me, (a) that ship has probably sailed, (b) the Australian Govt doesn’t show much interest in protecting me anyway. Might do better under the EU methinks, so if was choosing, that would be my social media port of choice. Fortunately I don’t do it at all, so this is academic to me. Not just disinterested but pretty uninterested except as a social and economic phenomenon.
Re China’s got my tiktok, meh…