It is impossible to distil coverage of an ongoing major world event into a tidy list, but Crikey has collected a few longer reads and outlets you might want to begin with when it comes to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This helpful collection of resources from the Nieman Lab also provides quality information on who to follow, particularly on Twitter, for timely coverage. At least seven journalists have been killed in Ukraine since February.
English-language news media start-up The Kyiv Independent launched a few months before Russia invaded Ukraine. Since then the outlet’s coverage has become a must-read, as you can see from its spike in Twitter followers from 30,000 to 2.1 million as the war progressed.
Today, a teenager describes his three months in Russian captivity.
Locked in a tiny dilapidated prison cell in Vasylivka’s pre-trial detention center, the boy heard the harrowing screams of Ukrainian prisoners of war being tortured by Russian soldiers. He watched as some of them died after enduring hours of torture and was forced to clean the ‘torture room’ awash with their blood.
‘Every minute there was a very severe challenge because every minute could have been my last,’ the boy told the Kyiv Independent during an interview alongside his father.
World and national security reporter Christopher Miller has spent more than a decade in Ukraine and Eastern Europe and began reporting on the war in Ukraine for BuzzFeed News, but now writes for Politico. His coverage offers up-to-date analysis. This week he reported on a crucial new phase of the war.
Blasts that rocked a Russian military airfield in forcibly annexed Crimea signal the start of Ukraine’s counteroffensive in the south and a critical new phase of the war that could shape its ultimate outcome, two Ukrainian officials told POLITICO.
The series of explosions Tuesday sent huge fireballs and mushroom clouds of black smoke into the sky, scattering terrified Russian vacationers who were seen in videos shared on social media scrambling for safety on a beach and fleeing by car over the Crimea bridge to Russia.
Moscow downplayed the blasts, saying they were caused by ammunition that had accidentally detonated at the airfield, where satellite images showed several military planes had been parked.
Ukrainian-born reporter Simon Shuster has broken multiple huge stories about the war and provided sprawling intimate features on the crisis for TIME. Last month he profiled Olena Zelenska, wife of the Ukrainian president.
By the time the president rushed out the door, the children were awake, and seemed to understand what was happening. Kyrylo, age nine, obeyed his mother with a quiet intensity, stuffing a few of his things into a little rucksack: some markers, a puzzle book, pieces of a partially assembled Lego set. His sister, Oleksandra, 17, was in touch with her friends through social media, trying to get a better sense of what was happening outside.
About a hundred miles to the north, the Russian forces had exploded across the border around dawn, aiming to encircle the capital and overthrow Zelenskyy’s government. From the air, Russian paratroopers were descending on Kyiv and trying to seize the airports. Ukrainian troops and volunteers were putting up a tenacious fight. At one point that morning, as the First Lady stood at the windows of the presidential residence, a fighter jet tore through the sky, flying low enough for her to feel the sound inside her rib cage. The security guards told the family that they needed to go down to the basement. There was a risk the Russians would bomb them from the air.
And finally, you can catch up on coverage by Crikey’s own Amber Schultz who travelled to the Ukraine border and reported on the unfolding refugee crisis.
A group of mostly solo travellers are meeting for the first time, sleeping in a row on mats above the dining hall. They come from all over the world but are mostly former US soldiers on the day I visit. Most have purchased their own tactical gear — bulletproof vests, heavy boots and helmets — which they show off and compare among one another.
But they’re all very unprepared for what awaits them. They know they have to cross the border and find a white tent. They’ve heard rumours their passports will be taken from them once they arrive — one man has brought an expired one he hopes to hand in instead. None have any insurance and are hesitant to speak because they’re not sure if their governments allow ex-military to join foreign armies.
This article is an insult to readers with a functioning brain – pure propaganda selected entirely from Ukranian sources. Is it not the job of ‘journalists’ to present, at the very least, a variety of analyses that offer differing opinions, and then let the reader make up their own minds?
I’m surprised there is no reference to the recent Vogue shoot (which took place in the Zelenskys New York apartment) – some hard hitting military analysis contained in that, I’m sure…
Try moonofalabamaDOTorg – based in Hamburg despite the name – for a European view.
Former German intelligence office I believe
Thanks, I did not know that – it explains some of the angles.
Named after German Jewish composer Kurt Weill’s song ‘Moon of Alabama’ made famous by German singer/actress Lotte Lenya best known for playing James Bond villainess Rosa Klebb in From Russia With Love and being name dropped by Louis Armstrong. MOB has a strong, well reasoned and informed comments section. Very enlightening.
I mean Former German Intelligence officer.
Or not. If you trust Putin so much, why not read his own material conveniently translated to English for you by (independent journalist) Julia Davis.
Here’s a piece referring these sources which also mentions the Moon-ster:
https://medium.com/dfrlab/skripal-poisoning-if-not-russia-then-1d49f086e3e0
Excellent source. As well as ex CIA analyst, Larry Johnson “A Son of the New American Revolution” (https://sonar21.com/) amongst a plethora of others. Dyed in wool conservative Patrick Buchanan at the American Conservative (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/) is also one to listen to for a more balanced view point.
All I hear from those who claim we who question the Ukrainian conflict from a non standard western MSM viewpoint are that we are brainwashed, ‘Putin’s stooges’, old style communists (I’ve never been one nor could I have been one) and any other pejoratives that can pass the moderator. In other words, vitriol. And at the same time they never seem to try to see someone else’s point of view which leads me to the conclusion that they truly lead unexamined lives.
I respect Putin and Xi which is a lot more than I can say about Biden, Johnson, Morrison, Schultz, Macron et al as both those gentlemen at least seem to care for their people and their people reciprocate by giving them sky high approval. If those so-called ‘leaders’ of the West also cared for their people then I expect they would have approval ratings in the same stratosphere as the two first mentioned gentlemen, not where they are right now.
Biden’s ratings are almost in parity with the US inflation index, Johnson tossed out, Morrison tossed out, Macron a President in name only being neutered by the general election, Schultz down in the basement due to his pig headed sanctioning of his country’s only reliable source of power and as for the ‘leadership’ of the EU, unelected and unloved and presiding over an organisation that looks as if it could self implode at any minute. Add to that the rest of the planet who either abstained or voted against the veto of Russia’s SMO in Ukraine with many of them now making overtures to join BRICS or the SCO and it is easy to come to the conclusion that the ‘times they are a changing’ and this time and unlike the 60s when that line first gained prominence (thanks Bob) it is really happening. All I can say is ‘bring it on!’
You have played the ‘devil’s advocate’ by shooting the messenger without cause, now can you cite credible sources on Russia-Ukraine?
The point of my comment was not to trade ‘credible sources on Russia-Ukraine’ – this would inevitably result in an endless battle of ‘my sources are better than yours’ – an utterly futile exercise.
The purpose of my post was to highlight the blatantly one sided source material the writer offers Crikey readers. As I stated, that is not journalism, it’s pure propaganda, and yes, both sides are guilty of it. But please, treat readers with some respect – allow us to form our own opinions based on a much wider range of reference material than is offered in the disappointing article.
So you’re not going to answer Drew’s question.
Instead you then talk about treating readers with “respect”. Bit rich really isn’t it?
But maybe you’ll eventually discourage independent reporting about Ukraine.
That’s the whole point of the organised campaign here, isn’t it? That people eventually say “you can’t believe any media, they are all biased”.
This new news editor should be aware that Crikey readers are usually more geo politically aware. They know more about the background history of this conflict than typical MSM readers going back to the Maiden Revolution and earlier, the aborted Minsk II agreements, the 14,000 plus combatants and civilians who have died since 2014 before the escalation this year. Some may have also read US government funded think tank The RAND Corporation report on destabilising Russia using Ukraine as a proxy.
Do you work for the Russian Embassy?
Something like that, I suspect.
You are so predictable, ‘Drew’. Do you work for the US Embassy?
You repeat Drew’s comment and throw it back at him and then say that *he* is predictable?
No, he’s just mentioning historical facts leading up to this war. Sorry if it’s upsetting your simplistic, black-and-white, goodies-vs-baddies view of history.
So the Nazis and their defeat was just a simplistic, black-and-white, goodies-vs-baddies view of history too?
Again, you and the other pro-Putin commenters here are just trying to confuse things, to get people to say “I don’t what to believe. I’ll just ignore it all”.
Here’s someone you’ll believe – @DarthPutinKGB on Twitter:
“Dictators don’t do propaganda so you believe something, we do it do you will believe nothing. Then you will do nothing”.
Well said. The comments on this page are so childish. “Goodies vs Baddies” or “Cops and Robbers” are irrelevant terms that indicate the writer’s failure to evolve from the primary school playground.
Hitler’s Third Reich may not have happened if the architects of the atreaty
Nazism was unadulterated evil and WW2 was the closest we’ve come to a goodies-vs-baddies conflict, but that doesn’t mean we deny the war crimes committed by the allies or the contribution to the causes of the war by the idiots who inflicted the Treaty of Versailles on the German people after WW1 (vs the Marshall Plan after WW2). You really need to learn how to keep two ideas in your head at the same time.
National Socialism was unadulterated evil and WW2 was the closest we’ve come to a goodies-vs-baddies conflict, but that doesn’t mean we deny the war crimes committed by the allies or the contribution to the causes of the war by the idiots who inflicted the Treaty of Versailles on the German people after WW1 (vs the Marshall Plan after WW2). You really need to learn how to keep two ideas in your head at the same time.
Wow. You have listed every outlet which reports Ukrainian Propaganda. Why not mention Eva Bartlett, or Gordon Phillips, or Lancaster, or channels like Redacted, or Jackson Hinkle, or The New Atlas, or The Gray Zone, or Duran, all of which interview US ex military staff like Scott Ritter, or who quote John Mearsheimer?????Or, are you just another spoke in the wheel on the road to Armaggedon which the USA has paved?????
Telling how videos by Patrick Lancaster and other reporting from the other side are never acknowledged in MSM .Patrick Lancaster is literally reporting and filming as Ukrainian missiles are exploding around him in civilian areas of Donetsk, narrowly escaping being killed, seeking shelter with terrified residents as well as being across the road when a market is hit killing three civilians.
Yes 100% agree. Most unimpressive, amateur attempt. If you being paid for kocking out this rubbish after 10 minutes google search Crikey is being completely ripped of! And as subscriber i am annoyed money is being wasted like this…
Perhaps we have been over indulged with Mearsheimers views and as for Grayzone, they struggle to hide their pro Putin bias. The most interesting insights come from Vlad Vexler who wouldn’t give the aforementioned any credibility when it comes to knowledge of Russia.
Agree, but Crikey comments seems overpopulated by Putin lovers or appeasers and lack basic critical thinking skills, but in lock step and furious agreement citing all the same sources?
Dear Drew, I am not a Putin lover. You are simply a Putin hater who ascribes all of the bulldust nonsense the so-called Western Media ascribes to him.
You’re disturbing his simple goodies-vs-baddies worldview.
Please check out the Vice article on your hero Patrick Lancaster before calling other people naive.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxneb4/ukraine-patrick-lancaster-journalist
I’m sure that there are many other similar articles out there on the “sources” referred to above.
But a big congrats to Crikey, again, for being incredibly even-handed despite the vitriol from all the old socialist campaigners here.
Or maybe I’m wrong. Name a Top 20 song that you’ve listened to in the last year (Olivia Newton John doesn’t count).
Sadly, people like the above who are a mixture of old Stalinists and the far-right won’t read the article because it doesn’t adhere to their extreme views.
Read that article on Vice. What guarantee have you that the writer is not a pro-Ukrainian propagandist? I found this article in Vice to be nothing but a diatribe against those who don’t drink the Ukrainian Cool Aid. Most Orwellian.
Yep. In crisis after crisis, Western narrative control kicks into overdrive to shift blame, whitewash culprits, or make sure inconvenient lines of questioning are never pursued.
As outlined in an article elsewhere on just this subject:
“That’s the modus operandi of the Western elites – it’s not the truth that matters, but successfully managing the narrative so that it doesn’t leave room for doubt in people’s minds. In other words, they think they can do whatever they want.
Perhaps we should remind ourselves of the post-Cold War Western formula announced during the heady days of the early 2000s, an era marked by another famous American political quote, Karl Rove’s “we’re an empire now and, when we act, we create our own reality.” “
And it works a treat.
See my comment to Drew below.
This goodies vs baddies diatribe is sickeningly juvenile.
I found this to be shockingly the case. I subscribed to Crikey today to support the fight against Murdoch, only to be confronted by the hypocrisy of the inane comments to be found on this website. Disturbing and harrowing. The confrontational nature of the comments for example that appear on this page dissuade any rational debate. You can’t post a rational thought here without being attacked. I’m sorry to see this situation has arisen here.
No-one here has said they love Putin or agree with his invasion of Ukraine. Critical thinking means being able to see all aspects of a complex reality, including in this case both Putin’s illegal invasion and the US/NATO actions that provoked it. Reducing it to ‘all due to evil Putin’ and denying the well documented actions of the US is childishly simplistic and lacking even the basics of critical thinking.
There’s very definitely a putrid smell of pro-Putin bias in these comments. What foul stench emits from this cesspit of comments?
This comment seems to be an example of the confrontational and non-rational attacks you criticise above. See my comment to Drew above for a more rational contribution, but you have to be able to hold two thoughts in your head at the same time.
You beat me to it as you name every discredited outlet lacking credibility and promoting Kremlin agitprop, that should be avoided.
What is it about Putin and Russia that turns on these types? Like Abbott, Trump et al. and supposed strong men?
What is about the likes of you who are able to swallow every load of nonsense and propaganda fed to you?
Ironic, given you are the one who are promoting “journalists” who push Putin’s propaganda.
“Finding reliable war reporting is difficult” … that’s a fact … but not the one-sided rubbish Crikey has dished up here. Expect better … pull ya socks up Crikey and show us both sides!
“What was the ‘other side’ of Auschwitz?” – John Pilger.
Oh, great a “both sides” kind of guy! How refreshing!
The first casualty of war is the truth. So expecting it is futile.
Thanks for telling us the truth, to never expect the truth. Oh hang on….
@DarthPutinKGB on Twitter:“Dictators don’t do propaganda so you believe something, we do it do you will believe nothing. Then you will do nothing”.