This article is part of a series about a legal threat sent to Crikey by Lachlan Murdoch, over an article Crikey published about the January 6 riots in the US. For the series introduction go here, and for the full series go here.
This is the second letter exchange. To read all the letters, click here.
From Murdoch
John Churchill, Lachlan Murdoch’s lawyer, didn’t much like what we said in reply to his first demand. This is what he wrote back.
From Crikey
We tried again, forcefully rejecting Churchill’s claims about the article. We also switch law firms in order to keep the Murdoch matter separate from other legal affairs.
Click here to read the next letter in this series.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.