
Has one of the biggest problems in the Australian economy finally been acknowledged by the Reserve Bank?
On Friday, amid his now-usual spiel about how wages growth needs to be suppressed, Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe said this.
[I]t is important that we avoid a cycle where higher inflation leads to higher wages and inflation remaining high. This type of cycle would lead to higher interest rates, a weaker economy and higher unemployment. Businesses, too, have a role in avoiding these damaging outcomes by not using the higher inflation as cover for an increase in profit margins.
Wait, what? You mean, Phil, that inflation might be partly driven by businesses sneaking through price rises just to bolster profits? That couldn’t mean, could it, that our markets are not competitive enough to prevent corporations from using market power to transfer income from consumers and other businesses to their profit columns, under the guise of inflation?
It was an afterthought from Lowe — the big problem is still workers, apparently — but at least he can countenance the idea that corporate power is badly skewing our economy against the interests of households. There are plenty of economists, and commentators at neoliberal bunkers like The Australian Financial Review, who refuse to accept that.
Lowe can call for wage restraint by unions and then mumble an epilogue about corporations pushing prices up more than necessary, but there’s only going to be one side that does what he wants. Courtesy of a rigged industrial relations system, and the way we’ve allowed corporations to develop ever greater market power, workers just don’t have the bargaining power to push for wage rises that even match inflation, let alone exceed it.
Most workers — except, of course, the occupants of C-suites across the country, who will continue to enjoy double-digit remuneration growth — will have no choice but to comply with Lowe’s demand they suffer a significant loss of real income.
But the only reaction to Lowe from businesses is likely to be a stifled giggle. They have the power to inflate profits by pushing up prices, and they have higher inflation as a cover for it, so they won’t be stopping using that power, even if Lowe starts berating them with a megaphone. Look no further than Qantas using its market dominance to cut capacity and jack up prices.
In his previous guise as a champion of an end to wage stagnation — he’s now shed that role; he thinks even wage stagnation is too much, and would prefer you to be suffering real wage cuts, thank you — Lowe and the RBA were willing to explore the systemic reasons why wages growth was so low: the role of public sector wage caps, the impact of temporary workers in wages, even the role of workers’ bargaining power. And he was prepared to call for governments to ditch public sector wage caps to get wages moving.
If he genuinely believes that corporations are pushing prices up more than they need to to lift profits even further, then he should start doing the same about corporate power — diagnosing the reasons why corporations have become so concentrated (he could start with the need for competition law reform, as urged by Rod Sims) and urging governments to take action to fix the problem.
That would, of course, put the RBA fundamentally at odds both with corporations, who ceaselessly look for ways to curb competition, and neoliberals and right-wing economists, who believe the fundamental goal of policymaking should be to make corporations as unfettered as possible, including on mergers and acquisitions.
But if the RBA expects households to cop it sweet while it belts them over and over with rate hikes, while corporations make bigger profits from higher prices, the least Lowe could do is advocate for a more competitive economy and less corporate power.
It’s a message that still has to sink in across the government and the commentariat. At least Ross Gittins gets it. In an excoriating column today, he reached a new height of dudgeon on a theme that he’s been building on for a while now, one long familiar to Crikey readers: we have a dysfunctional economy in which households are being belted by corporations pushing prices up to bolster profits, and a central bank pushing up interest rates, while both call for real wage cuts. The result — a “massive transfer of income from households to business profits”.
We need a lot more anger and outrage about this — particularly from those in a position of power.
Yes. This guy runs for cover anytime the economy is showing signs of sickness. He points the finger at anyone but himself and only a fool would fall for it. This Phil Lowe!? This dweeb with wispy hair and a soft, nasty threatening voice telling workers to go to hell and suck it up? This excuse for a man that now blames government spending (fiscal rectitude I think it’s called) for “partially” fuelling inflation after telling everyone in the world that interest rates won’t rise until 2014 and until there is significant movement on wages. Both of which are false. And you are giving him a get out of jail card by blaming businesses for what they have been doing here in Australia for over 200 years – gouge their customers? This guy who said nothing about our lack of competition in the airlines, groceries and department stores and our finance sector. That was done by a Treasury person – Keith Campbell.
Sorry, that should be 2024.
The only power the head of the RBA has is to set interest rates.
Any other perceived power is merely influence, and that comes with limitations. If Phillip Lowe were to bag corporate profiteering too aggressively, he’d soon be out of a job, because corporations have more influence over his employment as governor of the RBA than he has over their profits.
Bernard is right though – corporate profiteering is responsible for inflation and more people ought to hear about it.
From whom, though? Who in public life is not a self-interested profiteer or powermonger, or at least beholden to corporations?
Who in public life has a platform from which he or she can speak about this elephant in the room, and not be silenced?
Pocock et al, and I think that’s about it
The sentiment going up against the one fundamental truth of the system – the interest of any corporation is to maximise profit. This is where the government needs to take the lead rather than the reserve bank. Can’t expect the suits to care at all about ordinary people, but our system of government gives us the ability to elect those who can and should.
It’s truly tragic that the focus on maximising returns for the shareholders has overtaken the focus on providing for the population. A cost of living crisis exacerbated by corporate greed is something governments should stand tall against.
“ Can’t expect the suits to care at all about ordinary people, but our system of government gives us the ability to elect those who can and should.”
I keep hearing and reading this, Kel, but from where I’m sitting, I have the choice of electing a Labor government- suits who don’t care, or a Coalition government- suits who don’t care.
The Greens and independents can never govern under our system- the corporations win every election.
Hopefully the teal revolution is infectious.
And one positive from last election, at least in the senate, David Pocock seems to be making a good job of trying to stay focused on these issues without descending into demagoguery. So there is some hope.
I do have a lot of time for Pocock, but the other Teals campaigned on being social liberals and economic conservatives, for the most part. The electorates they represent would not have found them acceptable otherwise. I don’t share the faith others have in the Teals for that reason- not when it comes to economic matters.
I have more faith in what they represent – a break from party politics to turn politics local again, and more importantly that parties can’t use one issue (in this case taxes) to ignore social concerns.
What it shows me is a path forward for economic liberalism. Just convince enough of the population that progressive taxation policies are worth voting for, and we may get a tokenistic shift towards them by the major parties and a grassroots movement of politicians who are able to capitalise on it. So, yeah, simple…
Don’t expect any push back from the current mob in canberra, who increasingly wear the stench of the donor driven “ideology” of their predessors.
Evidence?
Hands off big fossil fuel? Check
Mass immigration? Check
Stage 3 tax cuts? Check
Furtive meetings with the murdoch clan? Check
At least it looks as though we’ll eventually get our NACC.
As for reform around donations- don’t hold your breath.
Memo Albo and co: being less terrible than the worst government since federation is no badge of honour.
iiNet just put my plan up $5 per month to $79.99 for a NBN50 connection. Already dumped them.
Stan just put my plan up $3 per month to $16, it was a reminded that I rarely watch it. Already dumped them.
Any price rises are going to met with transferals to different providers, even if the price is the same, and so far I have managed to get the same things cheaper elsewhere.
I can afford it, but I’ve started to get rid of this junk that I pay for without really being cognizant of what it all adds up to per month.