World leaders and dignitaries will converge on Tokyo today for another round of state funeral turned global forum, but tributes to the late former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe are expected to be overshadowed by protests.
The funeral comes three months after Japan’s longest-serving PM was shot dead by a man who accused him of fostering links with the controversial Unification Church (allegations that turned out to be true).
Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s decision to part with convention and honour Abe with a fully taxpayer-funded affair seemed somewhat fitting at a time of collective shock and grief, but as that wore off and revelations came to light about the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)’s links to the church, the funeral became a political flashpoint.
Not only did it dredge up the divisive politics of the late PM, but it also called into question Kishida’s integrity, whose popularity has since plummeted to record lows.
Kate Stevenson, public policy manager for Japanese government relations advisory firm GR Group, said people in Japan believed Kishida’s reign would herald a “golden era” of political stability, but that’s now “up in the air”.
The dip is “linked” but “not limited” to the state funeral. A recent Asahi Shimbun poll found that of those opposed to the funeral, 67% disapproved of cabinet, and 58% opposed it “because it uses the national budget”.
A further 20% of the no-funeral camp didn’t agree with Abe’s policies or legacy, and 19% blamed revelations about his relationship with the church. Two-thirds of those who did support a state funeral cited Abe’s political legacy, 17% put it down to his stature as their longest-serving PM, and only 13% said it was the circumstances surrounding his death that warranted it.
Diplomatic opportunity or debacle?
So why was Abe awarded a state funeral?
Stevenson put it plainly: “If Abe had not been shot during an election campaign, he would not get a state funeral.”
Freelance political writer Jio Kamata said it doubled as a diplomatic opportunity for Kishida: “One reason is to use it as an opportunity to host world leaders and boost Japan’s position on the world stage. The other reason is to appease the conservative elements of his party.”
While some big names are attending — such as India’s Narendra Modi, Singapore’s Lee Hsien Loong, Australia’s Anthony Albanese (and his entourage of former Liberal PMs — John Howard, Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull), as well as US Vice-President Kamala Harris — other heads of state are not.
“When Kishida made his decision to host the event, there were reports that the French president, ex-German chancellor, and former US president Barack Obama would all come. But now none of them are,” Kamata said. “The opposition are saying that they’re not coming because the state funeral has become unpopular in Japan and world leaders don’t want to be associated with this event.”
Independent politician Ryuichi Yoneyama tweeted that a decade of Abe’s administration had put Japan in a global position where dignitaries did not want to attend.
Opposition member Hideya Sugio also tweeted, noting no G7 leaders would be attending.
Albanese was confident he filled the gap, telling reporters: “It’s a good sign of respect that you have three former prime ministers and the current guy, me, all heading up there this morning.”
Custom and convention
Japanese custom dictates that a funeral follows a few days after death. There was a private funeral for Abe in Tokyo on July 12, four days after he was fatally shot. For the state funeral, a special organising committee was established, the venue was chosen, and the date locked in, with government officials forced to work around existing bookings for the Nippon Budokan and traffic concerns. The funeral is projected to cost $18 million.
Who’s at fault?
Some Japanese blame Abe’s political past, while others blame Kishida’s present politics.
Abe was (and continues to be) a contentious character. Globally he was renowned as a statesman; domestically he was a divisive social conservative. His plan to break with Japan’s post-World War II pacifist constitution and transform the country’s self-defence force into a full-fledged military, combined with his refusal to accept responsibility for Japan’s sexual servitude of South Korean women during the war, were two points of contention.
For Teruhiko Fukushima, a recently retired professor of international relations at the National Defence Academy of Japan, it ultimately comes down to timing.
“His funeral is dividing the national opinion because Mr Abe’s death is too close to his time as prime minister,” he said. Compare this to Japan’s postwar PM Shigeru Yoshida, the last person to receive a state funeral in 1967, who “died long after he was prime minister”.
When Fukushima was at school, children watched Yoshida’s funeral on the classroom TV and the teacher explained his significance.
“I doubt such a thing would be done this time for Mr Abe,” he said.
But Kamata claims Kishida’s lack of consultation and communication is weighing down public opinion more than Abe’s political legacy.
“Kishida did not provide the Japanese people with a rationale that made sense for a state funeral,” he said, citing overwhelming support for Abe’s eight-year term in office following his resignation.
Senior politicians — particularly in the conservative faction of the Liberal Democratic Party that Abe was part of — have done their part to add fuel to the fire. Politician Toshihiro Nikai said that people opposed to the funeral should “be quiet, put their hands together and let it pass”.
Today Tokyo will be at a standstill. The government has closed off airspace and mobilised a 2500-strong security sentinel (on top of the standard police presence) in preparation for planned protests. Thousands are expected to attend. Such a turnout would be significant — protest is not common in Japan.
Tokyo resident Mitsue Mito said it is not Japanese nature: “Unfortunately, no one around me is taking protest action. Including me. The only protest we can at least make is elections. I think these are the conservative and defensive weaknesses of the Japanese people.”
What a wonderful tribute from Australian taxpayers to fund two former, corrupt Prime Minsters flight to Tokyo to attend Abe’s funeral. I I imagine accommodation, meals and drinks were also put on the Aussie taxpayers credit card.
I’m totally embarrassed to have those immoral creeps representing my country.
Howard as everyone knows was instrumental in the cheating of East Timor out of its fair share of revenue from gas reserves and Abbott – well apart from making Australia look totally ridiculous Knighting the Queens late husband it’s common knowledge it was very strange how his daughter received a non competitive scholarship for $60,000 to cover her education?
Never paid back was it ? That $60,000 same as the fares and expenses for this joyride will never be recouped.
Yep it’s bloody embarrassing having Howard and Abbott on the world stage representing us.
Alison Bussell
0487175208
Abe’s exactly what we repelled at Kokoda..it’s a wonder his departure wasn’t held at the Shinto Shrine..
Was the government ‘smiled-upon’ UC offering up ‘alms’ to the Abe party/government?
100% good comments here. Abe has close links with the nasty, discredited ‘Moonies’ that have wracked South Korean politics. He deserved what he got. My sympathies are with the gunman.
Funny how our media doesn’t seem to want reflect on those aspects of Abe’s rule – it’s left to the great unwashed hoi polloi to remember.
Was it Turnbull, Abbott and Howard, that Albanese took with him – to be seen with?
The current incumbent said that appalling trio was on the junket because they were PMs who dealt with Abe.
Presumably Rudd & Gillard were also invited but had no more sense and declined.